Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Solar | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $6.33B | $1.20B | $355.61B | $896.00B | $422.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.21B | $49.28B | $280.33B | $191.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-427M | $-67M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $30.51B |
| Gross Margin | — | 23.0% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 56.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.5% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.7x | 25.3x | 14.4x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $32M | $766M | $45.49B | $942.38B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $516M | $244M | $10.27B | $343.34B | $231.84B |
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abivax S.A. (ABVX) | 100 | 1049.5 | +949.5% |
| Array Technologies,… (ARRY) | 100 | 44.8 | -55.2% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 146.3 | +46.3% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 230.6 | +130.6% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 212.7 | +112.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ABVX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs JPM's 465.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 7.1%, current ratio 8.75x
- +12.8% vs ARRY's +4.6%
ARRY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth 62.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- 40.2% revenue growth vs ABVX's -100.0%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- 27.8% margin vs ARRY's -5.6%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs ABVX's -143.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.81 vs KO's 2.26
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
- Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26
BAC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.86, yield 2.3%
- Beta 0.86, yield 2.3%, current ratio 0.42x
- Beta 0.86 vs ARRY's 2.47, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% revenue growth vs ABVX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.4x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.81 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs ARRY's -5.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs ARRY's 2.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.8% vs ARRY's +4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs ABVX's -143.2% |
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories
ARRY leads 1 • ABVX leads 1 • JPM leads 0 • BAC leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and ABVX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARRY's -5.6%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.2B | $49.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$327M | $95M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $40.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$427M | -$67M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $30.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$250M | $58M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +23.0% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +56.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +4.5% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -5.6% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +15.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +4.8% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -26.1% | +12.1% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.0% | -7.0% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ARRY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 46% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.90x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $1.2B | $355.6B | $896.0B | $422.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $1.7B | $390.8B | $1.50T | $556.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.96x | -10.64x | 27.18x | 16.00x | 14.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.68x | 25.27x | 14.40x | 12.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | 0.90x | 0.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.04x | 26.39x | 18.36x | 13.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.93x | 7.42x | 3.20x | 2.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.76x | 4.55x | 10.40x | 2.47x | 1.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.98x | 67.15x | 8.88x | 33.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-3 for ABVX. ABVX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARRY's 2.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs ABVX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.0% | -20.6% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -143.2% | -4.4% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +9.0% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -77.7% | +8.2% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 2.94x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$484M | $522M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $516M | $244M | $10.3B | $343.3B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $32M | $766M | $45.5B | $942.4B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.16x | -2.42x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ABVX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABVX five years ago would be worth $116,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,829 for ARRY. Over the past 12 months, ABVX leads with a +1275.4% total return vs ARRY's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ABVX at 126.6% vs ARRY's -29.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -27.8% | -19.7% | +20.3% | -0.5% | +1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1275.4% | +4.6% | +17.2% | +21.8% | +28.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1063.3% | -65.4% | +47.0% | +138.2% | +103.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1063.3% | -51.7% | +65.6% | +118.2% | +47.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1063.3% | -78.7% | +121.1% | +465.8% | +368.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +126.6% | -29.8% | +13.7% | +33.6% | +26.6% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARRY's 2.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ARRY's 63.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 2.47x | -0.20x | 0.94x | 0.86x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $148.83 | $12.23 | $84.04 | $337.25 | $57.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.69 | $5.39 | $65.35 | $262.71 | $43.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.9% | +63.5% | +98.3% | +95.1% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.7 | 42.4 | 60.6 | 59.1 | 68.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 5.3M | 12.7M | 7.0M | 31.7M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABVX as "Buy", ARRY as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.9% upside for ABVX (target: $131) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $131.22 | $9.80 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 28 | 48 | 61 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +1.9% | +2.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 56 | 15 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $5.95 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% | +5.1% |
KO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARRY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ABVX vs ARRY vs KO vs JPM vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is the stronger pick with 40. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Abivax S. A. (ABVX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
7x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Array Technologies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, Abivax S.
A. (ABVX) delivered a total return of +1063%, compared to -51. 7% for Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABVX returned +1063% versus ARRY's -78. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Array Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 47β — meaning ARRY is approximately -1333% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abivax S. A. (ABVX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for Array Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Array Technologies, Inc.
(ARRY) is pulling ahead at 40. 2% versus -0. 5% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Array Technologies, Inc. grew EPS 62. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 1% for Abivax S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KO leads at 3. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus -4. 1% for Array Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for ABVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABVX: 35. 9% to $131. 22.
08Which pays a better dividend — ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), BAC (2. 3% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. ABVX, ARRY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ABVX or ARRY or KO or JPM or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Array Technologies, Inc. (ARRY) carries a higher beta of 2. 47 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, ARRY: -78. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ABVX and ARRY and KO and JPM and BAC?
These companies operate in different sectors (ABVX (Healthcare) and ARRY (Energy) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ABVX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARRY is a small-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. KO, JPM, BAC pay a dividend while ABVX, ARRY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.