Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.29B
5Y Perf.-60.9%
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.26B
5Y Perf.+99.6%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.+20.8%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$429M
5Y Perf.+216.3%
HAL
Halliburton Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$33.74B
5Y Perf.-0.3%

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ACDC logoACDC
LBRT logoLBRT
PUMP logoPUMP
NINE logoNINE
HAL logoHAL
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$1.29B$5.26B$1.93B$429M$33.74B
Revenue (TTM)$1.94B$4.05B$1.18B$571M$22.17B
Net Income (TTM)$-367M$150M$-12M$-41M$1.54B
Gross Margin3.7%10.7%8.3%11.5%15.3%
Operating Margin-8.5%1.5%-1.1%2.0%11.3%
Forward P/E3568.1x2021.8x17.4x
Total Debt$1.14B$873M$249M$383M$8.13B
Cash & Equiv.$23M$28M$91M$18M$2.21B

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HALLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ACDC
LBRT
PUMP
NINE
HAL
StockMay 22May 26Return
ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC)10039.1-60.9%
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100199.6+99.6%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100120.8+20.8%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100316.3+216.3%
Halliburton Company (HAL)10099.7-0.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HAL leads in 6 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Nine Energy Service, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ACDC
ProFrac Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

ACDC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: energy exposure
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 98.8% 10Y total return vs HAL's 17.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Best for: momentum
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick

HAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.7%
  • Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.57, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHAL logoHAL-3.3% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueHAL logoHALBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHAL logoHAL6.9% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
Stability / SafetyHAL logoHALBeta 0.57 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsHAL logoHAL1.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4%
Efficiency (ROA)HAL logoHAL6.1% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 10.2% vs -4.6%

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ACDCProFrac Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Service
87.2%$1.7B
Product
12.8%$249M
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M
HALHalliburton Company
FY 2025
Completion And Production
57.6%$12.8B
Drilling And Evaluation
42.4%$9.4B

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLHALLAGGINGNINE

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 38.8x NINE's $571M. HAL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.9B$4.0B$1.2B$571M$22.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$251M$549M$154M$61M$3.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$367M$150M-$12M-$41M$1.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$20M-$193M-$11M-$7M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+3.7%+10.7%+8.3%+11.5%+15.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-8.5%+1.5%-1.1%+2.0%+11.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-18.9%+3.7%-1.1%-7.2%+6.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.0%-4.8%-0.9%-1.2%+7.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.0%+4.5%-24.7%-4.4%-0.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%+16.7%-134.2%-34.6%+129.2%
HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.9x trailing earnings, HAL trades at a 99% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.9x.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
Market CapShares × price$1.3B$5.3B$1.9B$429M$33.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$2.4B$6.1B$2.1B$793M$39.7B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-3.10x36.48x2021.79x-7.92x26.93x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3568.13x17.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.54x10.50x10.81x337.94x11.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x1.31x1.52x1.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.30x2.59x2.00x3.23x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF65.81x373.05x45.52x20.18x
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-38.2%+7.4%-1.4%+14.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-13.1%+4.0%-1.0%-11.5%+6.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.6%+2.3%+1.4%+0.7%+10.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.2%+3.0%+1.8%+0.9%+11.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934515
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.30x0.42x0.30x0.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.1B$846M$158M$364M$5.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$23M$28M$91M$18M$2.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$873M$249M$383M$8.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.22x5.24x-0.86x0.24x9.19x
HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $49,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1219.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+76.5%+72.5%+60.6%+2696.6%+37.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+56.4%+193.5%+199.8%+1219.8%+111.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-30.1%+172.7%+136.1%+151.3%+41.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%+155.3%+50.8%+397.5%+94.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-60.6%+98.8%+8.8%-62.1%+17.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-11.3%+39.7%+33.2%+36.0%+12.3%
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NINE and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.83x1.31x1.12x3.21x0.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.70$34.41$18.50$10.23$42.46
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.08$9.90$4.51$0.00$19.22
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+66.6%+94.3%+85.2%+96.8%+95.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.866.459.386.364.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M4.2M3.5M138K15.0M
Evenly matched — NINE and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ACDC as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -15.8% for ACDC (target: $6). For income investors, HAL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs LBRT's 1.01%.

MetricACDC logoACDCProFrac Holding C…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$34.00$14.75$18.00$37.08
# AnalystsCovering analysts61930964
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%+1.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises414
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.33$0.69
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.5%0.0%0.0%+3.0%
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

HAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallHalliburton Company (HAL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger pick with -3.

3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

On trailing P/E, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the cheapest at 26.

9x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +397. 5%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus NINE's -62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

57β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 463% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halliburton Company (HAL) is pulling ahead at -3.

3% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

Halliburton Company (HAL) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAL leads at 10. 2% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAL leads at 15. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 17.

4x forward P/E versus 3568. 1x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3550. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 81. 8% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?

In this comparison, HAL (1.

7% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

57), 1. 7% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +17. 2%, NINE: -62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ACDC and LBRT and PUMP and NINE and HAL?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LBRT, HAL pay a dividend while ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ACDC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HAL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ACDC and LBRT and PUMP and NINE and HAL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ACDC: -4.0% · LBRT: 4.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.