Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1.29B | $5.26B | $1.93B | $429M | $33.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.94B | $4.05B | $1.18B | $571M | $22.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-367M | $150M | $-12M | $-41M | $1.54B |
| Gross Margin | 3.7% | 10.7% | 8.3% | 11.5% | 15.3% |
| Operating Margin | -8.5% | 1.5% | -1.1% | 2.0% | 11.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3568.1x | 2021.8x | — | 17.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.14B | $873M | $249M | $383M | $8.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $23M | $28M | $91M | $18M | $2.21B |
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 39.1 | -60.9% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 120.8 | +20.8% |
| Nine Energy Service… (NINE) | 100 | 316.3 | +216.3% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 99.7 | -0.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACDC plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 98.8% 10Y total return vs HAL's 17.2%
Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NINE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4%
HAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.7%
- Rev growth -3.3%, EPS growth -47.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.57, yield 1.7%, current ratio 2.04x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -3.3% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.57 vs NINE's 3.21 | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.2% vs ACDC's +56.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 10.2% vs -4.6% |
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAL leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACDC leads 1 • LBRT leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • NINE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 38.8x NINE's $571M. HAL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $4.0B | $1.2B | $571M | $22.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $251M | $549M | $154M | $61M | $3.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$367M | $150M | -$12M | -$41M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $20M | -$193M | -$11M | -$7M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +10.7% | +8.3% | +11.5% | +15.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +1.5% | -1.1% | +2.0% | +11.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | +3.7% | -1.1% | -7.2% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.0% | -4.8% | -0.9% | -1.2% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.0% | +4.5% | -24.7% | -4.4% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +16.7% | -134.2% | -34.6% | +129.2% |
Valuation Metrics
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, HAL trades at a 99% valuation discount to PUMP's 2021.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $5.3B | $1.9B | $429M | $33.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $6.1B | $2.1B | $793M | $39.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.10x | 36.48x | 2021.79x | -7.92x | 26.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3568.13x | — | — | 17.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.54x | 10.50x | 10.81x | 337.94x | 11.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 1.31x | 1.52x | — | 1.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.30x | 2.59x | 2.00x | — | 3.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 65.81x | 373.05x | 45.52x | — | 20.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HAL delivers a 14.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -38.2% | +7.4% | -1.4% | — | +14.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.1% | +4.0% | -1.0% | -11.5% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.6% | +2.3% | +1.4% | +0.7% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.2% | +3.0% | +1.8% | +0.9% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.42x | 0.30x | — | 0.77x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $846M | $158M | $364M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $23M | $28M | $91M | $18M | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $873M | $249M | $383M | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.22x | 5.24x | -0.86x | 0.24x | 9.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $49,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,937 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1219.8% total return vs ACDC's +56.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 39.7% vs ACDC's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +76.5% | +72.5% | +60.6% | +2696.6% | +37.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.4% | +193.5% | +199.8% | +1219.8% | +111.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.1% | +172.7% | +136.1% | +151.3% | +41.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.6% | +155.3% | +50.8% | +397.5% | +94.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.6% | +98.8% | +8.8% | -62.1% | +17.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | +39.7% | +33.2% | +36.0% | +12.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NINE and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 66.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.31x | 1.12x | 3.21x | 0.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.70 | $34.41 | $18.50 | $10.23 | $42.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.08 | $9.90 | $4.51 | $0.00 | $19.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.6% | +94.3% | +85.2% | +96.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 66.4 | 59.3 | 86.3 | 64.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 4.2M | 3.5M | 138K | 15.0M |
Analyst Outlook
HAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACDC as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", HAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 81.8% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -15.8% for ACDC (target: $6). For income investors, HAL offers the higher dividend yield at 1.71% vs LBRT's 1.01%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $34.00 | $14.75 | $18.00 | $37.08 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 19 | 30 | 9 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | — | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 4 | — | 1 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.33 | — | — | $0.69 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.0% |
HAL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ACDC vs LBRT vs PUMP vs NINE vs HAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger pick with -3.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). Halliburton Company (HAL) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
On trailing P/E, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the cheapest at 26.
9x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 2021. 8x. On forward P/E, Halliburton Company is actually cheaper at 17. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.
(NINE) delivered a total return of +397. 5%, compared to -60. 6% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +98. 8% versus NINE's -62. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
57β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning NINE is approximately 463% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Halliburton Company (HAL) is pulling ahead at -3.
3% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAL leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
Halliburton Company (HAL) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
8% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAL leads at 10. 2% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAL leads at 15. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halliburton Company (HAL) trades at 17.
4x forward P/E versus 3568. 1x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3550. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 81. 8% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL?
In this comparison, HAL (1.
7% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACDC or LBRT or PUMP or NINE or HAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
57), 1. 7% yield). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: +17. 2%, NINE: -62. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACDC and LBRT and PUMP and NINE and HAL?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LBRT, HAL pay a dividend while ACDC, PUMP, NINE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.