Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACHC vs BKD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
ACHC vs BKD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Care Facilities |
| Market Cap | $2.33B | $3.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.37B | $3.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.11B | $-205M |
| Gross Margin | 56.2% | 13.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 1.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $2.65B | $6.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $133M | $279M |
ACHC vs BKD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acadia Healthcare C… (ACHC) | 100 | 88.4 | -11.6% |
| Brookdale Senior Li… (BKD) | 100 | 387.4 | +287.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACHC vs BKD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACHC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth -5.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- 5.0% revenue growth vs BKD's 4.8%
BKD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -21.8% 10Y total return vs ACHC's -56.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.67, current ratio 3.62x
- Beta 0.67, current ratio 3.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.0% revenue growth vs BKD's 4.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -6.6% margin vs ACHC's -32.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs ACHC's 0.84 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.1% vs ACHC's +6.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.4% ROA vs ACHC's -18.6%, ROIC 0.2% vs 5.9% |
ACHC vs BKD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACHC vs BKD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ACHC and BKD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACHC and BKD operate at a comparable scale, with $3.4B and $3.1B in trailing revenue. BKD is the more profitable business, keeping -6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHC's -32.8%. On growth, ACHC holds the edge at +7.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $3.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $588M | $381M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.1B | -$205M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$215M | $56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.2% | +13.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +1.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -32.8% | -6.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +1.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.6% | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.8% | +89.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ACHC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ACHC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKD's 25.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $9.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.08x | -12.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.98x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.40x | 25.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 1.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.07x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACHC delivers a -40.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-41 in annual profit, vs $-235 for BKD. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHC scores 5/9 vs BKD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.9% | -234.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.6% | -3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.5% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.24x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $6.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $133M | $279M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $6.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -5.99x | -0.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKD five years ago would be worth $21,485 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,964 for ACHC. Over the past 12 months, BKD leads with a +110.1% total return vs ACHC's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKD at 52.6% vs ACHC's -28.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +77.0% | +30.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | +110.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | +255.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -60.4% | +114.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.7% | -21.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -28.4% | +52.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACHC and BKD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BKD is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHC's 0.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 0.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.20 | $17.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.43 | $6.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +83.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.3M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
ACHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACHC as "Buy" and BKD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.6% upside for BKD (target: $18) vs -7.1% for ACHC (target: $24).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.50 | $17.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | +0.2% |
ACHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BKD leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
ACHC vs BKD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACHC or BKD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) is the stronger pick with 5. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 8% for Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD). Analysts rate Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ACHC or BKD?
Over the past 5 years, Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) delivered a total return of +114. 8%, compared to -60. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. (ACHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKD returned -21. 8% versus ACHC's -56. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ACHC or BKD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. 's 0. 84β — meaning ACHC is approximately 25% more volatile than BKD relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — ACHC or BKD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.
(ACHC) is pulling ahead at 5. 0% versus 4. 8% for Brookdale Senior Living Inc. (BKD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookdale Senior Living Inc. grew EPS -24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -537. 4% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACHC leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ACHC or BKD?
Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) is the more profitable company, earning -8. 4% net margin versus -33. 3% for Acadia Healthcare Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps -8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACHC leads at 11. 7% versus 0. 5% for BKD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKD leads at 20. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ACHC or BKD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKD: 24.
6% to $17. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — ACHC or BKD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is ACHC or BKD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookdale Senior Living Inc.
(BKD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BKD: -21. 8%, ACHC: -56. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ACHC and BKD?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.