Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Auto - Manufacturers
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Auto - Manufacturers | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $4.67B | $9.83B | $32M | $182.12B | $70.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $300K | $78M | $11M | $92.18B | $9.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-618M | $-957M | $-64M | $2.27B | $1.97B |
| Gross Margin | — | 11.2% | -236.8% | 4.8% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.6% | -5.9% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 4979.1x | 32.0x |
| Total Debt | $42M | $61M | $16M | $54.43B | $30.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.02B | $241M | $4M | $10.92B | $2.81B |
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 62.4 | -37.6% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 86.5 | -13.5% |
| Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 107.9 | +7.9% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 200.7 | +100.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACHR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
JOBY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 391.8% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5%
WKHS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +236.1% vs ACHR's -26.6%
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- 6.0% 10Y total return vs BA's 94.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 3.21x
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs WKHS's -49.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (32.0x vs 4979.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +236.1% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs WKHS's -60.6%, ROIC 20.9% vs -77.6% |
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACHR leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • WKHS leads 0 • BA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BA is the larger business by revenue, generating $92.2B annually — 307280.0x ACHR's $300,000. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, BA holds the edge at +14.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $300,000 | $78M | $11M | $92.2B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$709M | -$759M | -$52M | -$3.4B | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$618M | -$957M | -$64M | $2.3B | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$512M | -$661M | -$33M | -$1.0B | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +11.2% | -2.4% | +4.8% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2431.0% | -10.2% | -5.6% | -5.9% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2060.7% | -12.3% | -6.1% | +2.5% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1705.7% | -8.5% | -3.1% | -1.1% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | -5.0% | +14.0% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.5% | -9.1% | +95.9% | +31.3% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — JOBY and WKHS and BA and TDG each lead in 1 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.7x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 58% valuation discount to BA's 93.2x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $9.8B | $32M | $182.1B | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $9.6B | $44M | $225.6B | $97.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.34x | -8.85x | -0.07x | 93.16x | 38.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 4979.09x | 32.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | 21.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 9999.00x | 183.94x | 4.83x | 2.04x | 7.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 5.86x | 0.16x | 32.27x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 38.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDG leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 2.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-198 for WKHS. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BA scores 6/9 vs WKHS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -37.8% | -74.2% | -198.1% | +2.9% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -32.9% | -52.1% | -60.6% | +1.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -89.6% | -54.7% | -77.6% | -9.5% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -44.3% | -49.8% | -107.9% | -9.1% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.04x | 0.37x | 9.97x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$979M | -$180M | $12M | $43.5B | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $241M | $4M | $10.9B | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $42M | $61M | $16M | $54.4B | $30.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -3.84x | 1.89x | 2.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACHR and TDG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDG five years ago would be worth $24,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for WKHS. Over the past 12 months, WKHS leads with a +236.1% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACHR at 43.2% vs WKHS's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -30.4% | -34.7% | +1.4% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.6% | +55.7% | +236.1% | +24.5% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +193.5% | +128.7% | -98.6% | +17.1% | +86.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +1.0% | -99.8% | -1.9% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.0% | -4.8% | -99.8% | +94.6% | +595.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +43.2% | +31.8% | -75.9% | +5.4% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BA and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDG is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BA currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs WKHS's 30.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.96x | 2.70x | 1.46x | 0.97x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.62 | $20.95 | $11.80 | $254.35 | $1623.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $6.32 | $0.53 | $176.77 | $1123.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.0% | +47.7% | +30.8% | +90.8% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 65.5 | 72.7 | 56.9 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 27.6M | 24.7M | 167K | 6.5M | 370K |
Analyst Outlook
TDG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACHR as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", BA as "Buy", TDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 96.3% upside for ACHR (target: $12) vs 14.1% for BA (target: $264). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs BA's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.33 | $15.90 | — | $263.67 | $1617.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 8 | — | 54 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.2% | +13.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.43 | $165.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
TDG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ACHR vs JOBY vs WKHS vs BA vs TDG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 38.
7x versus The Boeing Company at 93. 2x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 32. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
Over the past 5 years, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) delivered a total return of +140.
2%, compared to -99. 8% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDG returned +595. 3% versus WKHS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning ACHR is approximately 276% more volatile than TDG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus -49. 5% for Workhorse Group Inc. (WKHS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 32.
0x forward P/E versus 4979. 1x for The Boeing Company — 4947. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACHR: 96. 3% to $12. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), BA (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. ACHR, JOBY, WKHS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACHR or JOBY or WKHS or BA or TDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, ACHR: -37. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACHR and JOBY and WKHS and BA and TDG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACHR (Industrials) and JOBY (Industrials) and WKHS (Consumer Cyclical) and BA (Industrials) and TDG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; WKHS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TDG pays a dividend while ACHR, JOBY, WKHS, BA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.