Aircraft & Aerospace Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
BA vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aircraft & Aerospace Parts
BA vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aircraft & Aerospace Parts | Aircraft & Aerospace Parts |
| Market Cap | $137.05B | $255.44B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94.91B | $95.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7.66B | $8.53B |
| Gross Margin | 9.4% | 21.1% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 11.8% |
| Forward P/E | 69.9x | 24.7x |
| Total Debt | $54.43B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.92B | $7.43B |
BA vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | Nov 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Boeing Company (BA) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 264.3 | +164.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: BA vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
BA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.5%, EPS growth 113.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.3%
- 34.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7%
RTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 33 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.4%
- 247.1% 10Y total return vs BA's 37.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.5% revenue growth vs RTX's 9.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.7x vs 69.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs BA's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs BA's 1.05, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 33-year raise streak, vs BA's 0.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +9.9% vs BA's -11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs BA's 4.6%, ROIC 7.0% vs -9.5% |
BA vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
BA vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX and BA operate at a comparable scale, with $96.0B and $94.9B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 8.9% (RTX) to 8.1% (BA). On growth, RTX holds the edge at +11.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94.9B | $96.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $15.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7.7B | $8.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1.5B | $10.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.4% | +21.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +11.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +10.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.9% | +11.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.4% | +34.0% |
Valuation Metrics
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.2x trailing earnings, RTX trades at a 45% valuation discount to BA's 69.9x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $137.1B | $255.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $180.6B | $287.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.92x | 38.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 24.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 21.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 2.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 24.22x | 3.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 32.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RTX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BA delivers a 127.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $127 in annual profit, vs $12 for RTX. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BA's 9.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs BA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +127.0% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.6% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -9.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -9.1% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 9.97x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43.5B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.9B | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $54.4B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.21x | 7.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RTX five years ago would be worth $22,248 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,787 for BA. Over the past 12 months, RTX leads with a +9.9% total return vs BA's -11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RTX at 33.8% vs BA's -3.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -23.9% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.8% | +9.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.1% | +139.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.1% | +122.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.9% | +247.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | +33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BA's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RTX currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs BA's 68.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $254.35 | $226.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $165.01 | $166.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.2% | +83.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.3 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.7M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
RTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates BA as "Buy" and RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.6% upside for BA (target: $244) vs 22.5% for RTX (target: $232). For income investors, RTX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.39% vs BA's 0.25%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $243.73 | $232.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 55 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | +1.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 33 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.43 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.0% |
RTX leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
Custom Comparison: BA vs RTX
Compare on any lens — Growth, Value, Income, or pick from 130+ individual metrics.
BA vs RTX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is BA or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Boeing Company (BA) is the stronger pick with 34.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the better valuation at 38. 2x trailing P/E (24. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boeing Company (BA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — BA or RTX?
On trailing P/E, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the cheapest at 38.
2x versus The Boeing Company at 69. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — BA or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, RTX Corporation (RTX) delivered a total return of +122.
5%, compared to -22. 1% for The Boeing Company (BA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +247. 1% versus BA's +37. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — BA or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
28β versus The Boeing Company's 1. 05β — meaning BA is approximately 274% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 10% for The Boeing Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — BA or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Boeing Company (BA) is pulling ahead at 34.
5% versus 9. 7% for RTX Corporation (RTX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Boeing Company grew EPS 113. 5% year-over-year, compared to 39. 7% for RTX Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BA leads at 10. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — BA or RTX?
RTX Corporation (RTX) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
6% net margin versus 2. 5% for The Boeing Company — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RTX leads at 10. 5% versus -6. 1% for BA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RTX leads at 20. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is BA or RTX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BA: 40.
6% to $243. 73.
08Which pays a better dividend — BA or RTX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
RTX Corporation (RTX) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 3% for The Boeing Company (BA).
09Is BA or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), 1. 4% yield, +247. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +247. 1%, BA: +37. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between BA and RTX?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: BA is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. RTX pays a dividend while BA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Related Comparisons
Other popular comparisons that include one of these companies.