Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
Grocery Stores
Specialty Retail
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8.32B | $7.62B | $42.03B | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $81.72B | $8.90B | $147.64B | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $870M | $507M | $1.02B | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 27.2% | 37.0% | 22.3% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 7.6% | 1.3% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.1x | 14.5x | 12.7x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $14.18B | $1.94B | $24.68B | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $298M | $257M | $3.33B | $10.73B |
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albertsons Companie… (ACI) | 100 | 102.6 | +2.6% |
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 316.5 | +216.5% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 196.2 | +96.2% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 326.1 | +226.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.46 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (7.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.46 vs 4.06
- 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SFM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 5.7% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- 12.5% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0%
KR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs SFM's 203.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
- Beta 0.12, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.79x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 44.7x), PEG 0.46 vs 4.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SFM's 0.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs SFM's -51.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 17.8% vs 5.0% |
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACI leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • KR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 79.0x SFM's $8.9B. SFM is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $81.7B | $8.9B | $147.6B | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.1B | $996M | $5.5B | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $870M | $507M | $1.0B | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.1B | $361M | $3.5B | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.2% | +37.0% | +22.3% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +7.6% | +1.3% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +5.7% | +0.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.5% | +4.1% | +2.4% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.9% | +4.1% | +1.2% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.3% | -5.5% | +50.0% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ACI leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.9x trailing earnings, ACI trades at a 79% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACI offers better value at 0.64x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.3B | $7.6B | $42.0B | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.2B | $9.3B | $63.4B | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.87x | 15.25x | 43.12x | 47.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.12x | 14.52x | 12.68x | 44.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.64x | 0.90x | — | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.49x | 9.35x | 10.91x | 24.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.10x | 0.86x | 0.28x | 1.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.79x | 5.70x | 7.33x | 10.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.10x | 16.29x | 12.55x | 24.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACI's 4.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs KR's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +34.8% | +36.1% | +13.0% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.2% | +12.5% | +2.0% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +17.8% | +5.0% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.1% | +22.1% | +5.5% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.19x | 1.39x | 4.16x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.9B | $1.7B | $21.3B | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $298M | $257M | $3.3B | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.2B | $1.9B | $24.7B | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.41x | 254.65x | 2.59x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $31,381 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,352 for ACI. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs SFM's -51.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs ACI's -4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.7% | +0.4% | +6.0% | +15.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.0% | -51.7% | -6.4% | +32.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.9% | +125.7% | +42.7% | +160.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.5% | +213.8% | +90.7% | +186.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.7% | +203.9% | +108.7% | +499.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.9% | +31.2% | +12.6% | +37.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFM's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.33x | 0.17x | -0.64x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.78 | $182.00 | $76.58 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.80 | $64.75 | $58.60 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +44.5% | +86.7% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.5 | 54.9 | 39.2 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.1M | 2.2M | 5.6M | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACI and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACI as "Buy", SFM as "Buy", KR as "Buy", WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for ACI (target: $20) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, ACI offers the higher dividend yield at 3.12% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.63 | $91.00 | $74.75 | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 43 | 44 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — | +2.0% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.51 | — | $1.35 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.0% | +6.2% | +6.4% | +0.8% |
SFM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ACI vs SFM vs KR vs WMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACI or SFM or KR or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) offers the better valuation at 9. 9x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc.
(ACI) is the cheapest at 9. 9x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Albertsons Companies, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Albertsons Companies, Inc. wins at 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +213. 8%, compared to +33. 5% for Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus ACI's +67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 64β versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning SFM is approximately -127% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 4% for Albertsons Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACI or SFM or KR or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 46x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Albertsons Companies, Inc. (ACI) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACI: 21. 3% to $19. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACI or SFM or KR or WMT?
In this comparison, ACI (3.
1% yield), KR (2. 0% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SFM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACI or SFM or KR or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 64), 2. 0% yield, +108. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 7%, SFM: +203. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACI and SFM and KR and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACI is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFM is a small-cap deep-value stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. ACI, KR, WMT pay a dividend while SFM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.