Grocery Stores
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SFM vs NGVC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Grocery Stores
SFM vs NGVC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Grocery Stores | Grocery Stores |
| Market Cap | $7.41B | $662M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.90B | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $507M | $48M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 29.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.94B | $332M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $257M | $17M |
SFM vs NGVC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sprouts Farmers Mar… (SFM) | 100 | 313.4 | +213.4% |
| Natural Grocers by … (NGVC) | 100 | 199.7 | +99.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SFM vs NGVC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SFM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.17
- Rev growth 14.1%, EPS growth 41.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 209.1% 10Y total return vs NGVC's 159.2%
NGVC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 1.06x
- PEG 0.78 vs SFM's 0.83
- Beta 0.06, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.06x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.1% revenue growth vs NGVC's 7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 14.1x), PEG 0.78 vs 0.83 | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs NGVC's 3.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs SFM's 0.17 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -41.1% vs SFM's -54.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NGVC's 7.2%, ROIC 17.8% vs 8.9% |
SFM vs NGVC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SFM vs NGVC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFM is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.9B annually — 6.7x NGVC's $1.3B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (SFM) to 3.6% (NGVC).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $8.9B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $996M | $95M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $507M | $48M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $361M | $93M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +29.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +3.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.1% | +7.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.1% | +1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.5% | +14.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NGVC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, NGVC trades at a 3% valuation discount to SFM's 14.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NGVC offers better value at 0.82x vs SFM's 0.88x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.4B | $662M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.1B | $977M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.83x | 14.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.12x | 13.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | 0.82x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.13x | 10.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.84x | 0.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.54x | 3.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.83x | 27.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFM delivers a 36.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $23 for NGVC. SFM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NGVC's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NGVC scores 8/9 vs SFM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +36.1% | +23.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +7.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.8% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +22.1% | +12.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.39x | 1.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $315M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $257M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $332M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 254.65x | 22.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NGVC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SFM five years ago would be worth $30,441 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,820 for NGVC. Over the past 12 months, NGVC leads with a -41.1% total return vs SFM's -54.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NGVC at 38.5% vs SFM's 29.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.3% | +17.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.4% | -41.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.2% | +165.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.4% | +98.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.1% | +159.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.3% | +38.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NGVC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NGVC is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFM's 0.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NGVC currently trades 47.0% from its 52-week high vs SFM's 43.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $182.00 | $61.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.75 | $23.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.3% | +47.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.6 | 63.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.4M | 122K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SFM as "Buy" and NGVC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.1% upside for NGVC (target: $40) vs 15.6% for SFM (target: $91). NGVC is the only dividend payer here at 1.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $91.00 | $40.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 43 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.47 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +0.2% |
NGVC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). SFM leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
SFM vs NGVC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SFM or NGVC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the stronger pick with 14. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 2% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC). Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) a "Buy" — based on 43 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SFM or NGVC?
On trailing P/E, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. at 14. 8x. On forward P/E, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SFM or NGVC?
Over the past 5 years, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) delivered a total return of +204. 4%, compared to +98. 2% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFM returned +209. 1% versus NGVC's +159. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SFM or NGVC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 17β — meaning SFM is approximately 206% more volatile than NGVC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. (SFM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 139% versus 156% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SFM or NGVC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is pulling ahead at 14. 1% versus 7. 2% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. grew EPS 41. 6% year-over-year, compared to 36. 1% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SFM leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SFM or NGVC?
Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc.
(SFM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 9% net margin versus 3. 5% for Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFM leads at 7. 8% versus 4. 7% for NGVC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SFM leads at 37. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SFM or NGVC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. 's 0. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc. (NGVC) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Sprouts Farmers Market, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGVC: 39. 1% to $40. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SFM or NGVC?
In this comparison, NGVC (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SFM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SFM or NGVC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Natural Grocers by Vitamin Cottage, Inc.
(NGVC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06), 1. 6% yield, +159. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NGVC: +159. 2%, SFM: +209. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SFM and NGVC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
NGVC pays a dividend while SFM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.