Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
Semiconductors
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $4.61B | $5.23T | $742.11B | $10.56B | $627.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $215.94B | $37.45B | $2.52B | $53.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $206M | $120.07B | $4.99B | $519M | $-3.17B |
| Gross Margin | 49.0% | 71.1% | 50.3% | 44.1% | 35.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.4% | 60.4% | 11.7% | 26.0% | -9.4% |
| Forward P/E | 18.5x | 26.0x | 62.4x | 21.3x | 116.5x |
| Total Debt | $872M | $11.41B | $4.47B | $0.00 | $46.59B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $10.61B | $5.54B | $102M | $14.27B |
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2423.6 | +2323.6% |
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 846.1 | +746.1% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.6 | -19.4% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 198.5 | +98.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACIW ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (18.5x vs 116.5x)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 243.2% 10Y total return vs AMD's 123.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs AMD's 12.08
Among these 5 stocks, AMD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JKHY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.21, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
- Beta 0.21 vs AMD's 2.52
- 1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
INTC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +494.7% vs JKHY's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.5x vs 116.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs AMD's 2.52 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 32-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs JKHY's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.0% |
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACIW leads 1 • JKHY leads 1 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 120.6x ACIW's $1.8B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $215.9B | $37.5B | $2.5B | $53.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $425M | $133.2B | $6.6B | $810M | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $206M | $120.1B | $5.0B | $519M | -$3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $290M | $96.7B | $8.6B | $728M | -$3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.0% | +71.1% | +50.3% | +44.1% | +35.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +60.4% | +11.7% | +26.0% | -9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +55.6% | +13.3% | +20.6% | -5.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | +44.8% | +22.9% | +28.9% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +73.2% | +37.8% | +8.7% | +7.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | +97.8% | +90.9% | +12.5% | -2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACIW leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.1x trailing earnings, ACIW trades at a 88% valuation discount to AMD's 171.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.46x vs AMD's 33.25x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $5.23T | $742.1B | $10.6B | $627.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $5.23T | $741.0B | $10.5B | $659.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.07x | 43.92x | 171.77x | 23.37x | -2120.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.50x | 26.00x | 62.38x | 21.31x | 116.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.74x | 0.46x | 33.25x | 2.32x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.39x | 39.27x | 110.64x | 13.52x | 56.44x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.62x | 24.22x | 21.42x | 4.44x | 11.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.14x | 33.43x | 11.82x | 5.00x | 4.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.88x | 54.10x | 110.19x | 17.95x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACIW's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.0% | +76.3% | +8.1% | +24.0% | -2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +58.1% | +6.5% | +17.0% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.4% | +81.8% | +4.7% | +21.0% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.7% | +97.2% | +5.7% | +22.7% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.57x | 0.07x | 0.07x | — | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $675M | $807M | -$1.1B | -$102M | $32.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $10.6B | $5.5B | $102M | $14.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $872M | $11.4B | $4.5B | $0 | $46.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 8.98x | 545.03x | 33.19x | 122.37x | 3.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $150,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,845 for JKHY. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs JKHY's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 94.7% vs JKHY's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -0.4% | +14.0% | +103.7% | -17.9% | +217.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.1% | +83.4% | +347.6% | -17.4% | +494.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.8% | +638.6% | +378.9% | -1.1% | +307.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.3% | +1409.1% | +499.0% | -1.6% | +129.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.1% | +24324.1% | +12371.0% | +94.7% | +350.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +23.2% | +94.7% | +68.6% | -0.4% | +59.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMD and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs JKHY's 75.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.74x | 2.52x | 0.21x | 2.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $54.28 | $217.80 | $456.25 | $193.39 | $130.57 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $38.05 | $115.21 | $101.56 | $141.81 | $18.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.8% | +98.8% | +99.8% | +75.4% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 66.4 | 63.4 | 76.1 | 36.1 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 708K | 160.0M | 36.8M | 903K | 113.6M |
Analyst Outlook
JKHY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACIW as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", INTC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.8% upside for ACIW (target: $70) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80). JKHY is the only dividend payer here at 1.55% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $275.74 | $401.65 | $194.63 | $79.55 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 79 | 70 | 22 | 84 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | 32 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $2.25 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.3% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACIW leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ACIW vs NVDA vs AMD vs JKHY vs INTC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) offers the better valuation at 21. 1x trailing P/E (18. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
On trailing P/E, ACI Worldwide, Inc.
(ACIW) is the cheapest at 21. 1x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 171. 8x. On forward P/E, ACI Worldwide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1409%, compared to -1.
6% for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. (JKHY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus JKHY's +94. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 52β — meaning AMD is approximately 1084% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 57% for ACI Worldwide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to 13. 1% for ACI Worldwide, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW) trades at 18. 5x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 98. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACIW: 53. 8% to $70. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC?
In this comparison, JKHY (1.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ACIW, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACIW or NVDA or AMD or JKHY or INTC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 5% yield). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 7%, AMD: +123. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACIW and NVDA and AMD and JKHY and INTC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACIW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JKHY pays a dividend while ACIW, NVDA, AMD, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.