Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $3.92B | $2.15T | $550.40B | $13.63B | $357.66B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $901M | $3.82T | $53.76B | $1.03B | $21.68B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $94M | $1.72T | $-3.17B | $106M | $6.71B |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | 59.9% | 35.4% | 48.8% | 50.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 50.8% | -9.4% | 10.0% | 34.3% |
| Forward P/E | 29.7x | 0.8x | 105.1x | 38.7x | 50.7x |
| Total Debt | $303M | $990.36B | $46.59B | $17M | $4.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $766M | $2.76T | $14.27B | $346M | $6.39B |
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 297.0 | +197.0% |
| Taiwan Semiconducto… (TSM) | 100 | 822.9 | +722.9% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 174.2 | +74.2% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| Lam Research Corpor… (LRCX) | 100 | 1046.4 | +946.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACMR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
TSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 1.91, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 33.0%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 18.2%, current ratio 2.62x
- PEG 0.03 vs LRCX's 2.26
INTC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +439.7% vs ONTO's +118.9%
Among these 5 stocks, ONTO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LRCX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 38.2% 10Y total return vs ACMR's 30.7%
- 31.4% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 55.7% vs -0.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.0% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.8x vs 50.7x), PEG 0.03 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.1% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.91 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs LRCX's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +439.7% vs ONTO's +118.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 31.4% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 55.7% vs -0.0% |
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TSM leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • LRCX leads 1 • INTC leads 0 • ONTO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.82T annually — 4237.1x ACMR's $901M. TSM is the more profitable business, keeping 45.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, LRCX holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $901M | $3.82T | $53.8B | $1.0B | $21.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $126M | $2.79T | $4.0B | $158M | $7.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $94M | $1.72T | -$3.2B | $106M | $6.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$69M | $1.02T | -$3.1B | $239M | $6.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.4% | +59.9% | +35.4% | +48.8% | +50.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +50.8% | -9.4% | +10.0% | +34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +45.1% | -5.9% | +10.3% | +30.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +26.7% | -5.8% | +23.2% | +29.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.4% | +21.6% | +7.2% | +9.5% | +23.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -76.1% | +42.0% | -2.8% | -48.5% | +40.8% |
Valuation Metrics
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.8x trailing earnings, TSM trades at a 61% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs LRCX's 3.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $2.15T | $550.4B | $13.6B | $357.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.5B | $2.09T | $582.7B | $13.3B | $356.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 43.21x | 38.76x | -1861.12x | 98.57x | 69.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.68x | 0.83x | 105.10x | 38.74x | 50.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.22x | 1.40x | — | 2.85x | 3.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.49x | 24.71x | 49.88x | 68.79x | 56.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.35x | 17.48x | 10.41x | 13.56x | 19.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.06x | 12.35x | 4.21x | 6.43x | 37.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 61.30x | — | 45.47x | 66.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LRCX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRCX delivers a 65.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRCX's 0.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSM scores 8/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +31.6% | -2.7% | +5.2% | +65.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +21.8% | -1.6% | +4.7% | +31.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +42.7% | -0.0% | +5.7% | +55.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +33.0% | -0.0% | +6.5% | +40.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.18x | 0.37x | 0.01x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$463M | -$1.77T | $32.3B | -$329M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $766M | $2.76T | $14.3B | $346M | $6.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $303M | $990.4B | $46.6B | $17M | $4.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 20.44x | 315.91x | 3.71x | — | 58.92x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ACMR and INTC and LRCX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRCX five years ago would be worth $46,048 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,575 for INTC. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +439.7% total return vs ONTO's +118.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs ONTO's 47.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.9% | +29.9% | +178.4% | +65.2% | +54.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +195.6% | +139.1% | +439.7% | +118.9% | +282.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +487.9% | +391.9% | +258.3% | +218.0% | +448.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.4% | +262.7% | +95.8% | +312.6% | +360.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3065.8% | +1739.7% | +299.2% | +1431.7% | +3815.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +80.5% | +70.1% | +53.0% | +47.1% | +76.4% |
Risk & Volatility
TSM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TSM is the less volatile stock with a 1.91 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSM currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs ACMR's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.24x | 1.91x | 2.15x | 2.66x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $71.65 | $420.00 | $114.51 | $315.86 | $298.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $19.26 | $171.37 | $18.97 | $85.88 | $72.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.6% | +98.6% | +95.7% | +86.8% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.7 | 68.9 | 85.9 | 61.0 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 13.3M | 110.6M | 832K | 9.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — TSM and LRCX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", TSM as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", ONTO as "Buy", LRCX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -32.4% for ACMR (target: $40). For income investors, TSM offers the higher dividend yield at 0.70% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.00 | $427.50 | $77.18 | $308.33 | $290.65 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 25 | 84 | 11 | 50 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | +0.7% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 5 | 0 | — | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $90.94 | — | — | $0.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | +1.0% |
TSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ACMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ACMR vs TSM vs INTC vs ONTO vs LRCX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger pick with 33.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) offers the better valuation at 38. 8x trailing P/E (0. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
On trailing P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the cheapest at 38.
8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited is actually cheaper at 0. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited wins at 0. 03x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
Over the past 5 years, Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) delivered a total return of +360.
5%, compared to +95. 8% for Intel Corporation (INTC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRCX returned +38. 2% versus INTC's +299. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
91β versus ACM Research, Inc. 's 3. 24β — meaning ACMR is approximately 70% more volatile than TSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 48% for Lam Research Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is pulling ahead at 33.
0% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intel Corporation grew EPS 98. 7% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more profitable company, earning 45.
1% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 45. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSM leads at 50. 8% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 03x versus Lam Research Corporation's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) trades at 0. 8x forward P/E versus 105. 1x for Intel Corporation — 104. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX?
In this comparison, TSM (0.
7% yield), LRCX (0. 3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. INTC, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACMR or TSM or INTC or ONTO or LRCX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (TSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +1740% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TSM: +1740%, ACMR: +30. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACMR and TSM and INTC and ONTO and LRCX?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; TSM is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LRCX is a large-cap high-growth stock. TSM pays a dividend while ACMR, INTC, ONTO, LRCX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.