Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Home Improvement | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances |
| Market Cap | $159M | $13M | $295M | $163M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $1.21B | $458M | $651M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $-275M | $22M | $-28M |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 34.5% | 23.2% | 37.5% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | -0.2% | 6.1% | -2.0% |
| Forward P/E | 17.1x | — | 11.9x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $1.01B | $59M | $244M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $64M | $40M | $4M |
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acme United Corpora… (ACU) | 100 | 148.3 | +48.3% |
| Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS) | 100 | 197.4 | +97.4% |
| Lifetime Brands, In… (LCUT) | 100 | 71.5 | -28.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 1.4%
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs FLXS's 51.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 4.21x
LESL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
FLXS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
- 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6%
- Lower P/E (11.9x vs 14.7x)
LCUT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +123.7% vs LESL's -89.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.9% revenue growth vs LESL's -6.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.9x vs 14.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs LESL's -22.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs LESL's 2.20 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs LCUT's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +123.7% vs LESL's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs LESL's -42.4%, ROIC 7.9% vs 1.6% |
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACU leads 1 • LCUT leads 1 • LESL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LESL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 8.1x ACU's $151M. ACU is the more profitable business, keeping 5.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LESL's -22.7%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $1.2B | $458M | $651M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $6M | $31M | $3M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | -$275M | $22M | -$28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $8M | $28M | $18M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +34.5% | +23.2% | +37.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -0.2% | +6.1% | -2.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | -22.7% | +4.8% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +0.6% | +6.1% | +2.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -16.0% | +9.8% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | -85.8% | -27.2% | -15.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LCUT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, FLXS trades at a 7% valuation discount to ACU's 16.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LCUT's 8.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LESL's 20.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $159M | $13M | $295M | $163M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $188M | $961M | $314M | $402M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.80x | -0.06x | 15.54x | -5.80x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.10x | — | 11.90x | 14.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.11x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.92x | 20.25x | 10.38x | 8.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.81x | 0.01x | 0.67x | 0.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.45x | — | 1.87x | 0.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.02x | — | 8.74x | 50.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLXS delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-14 for LCUT. ACU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCUT's 1.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs LCUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | — | +12.2% | -14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | -42.4% | +7.5% | -4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +1.6% | +9.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +2.1% | +12.3% | +5.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | — | 0.35x | 1.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $948M | $19M | $239M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,596 | $64M | $40M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $1.0B | $59M | $244M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | -3.06x | 380.21x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLXS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLXS five years ago would be worth $11,954 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for LESL. Over the past 12 months, LCUT leads with a +123.7% total return vs LESL's -89.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LESL's -81.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.8% | -17.3% | +38.7% | +87.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.1% | -89.7% | +80.1% | +123.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +67.8% | -99.3% | +242.4% | +52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.8% | -99.7% | +19.5% | -48.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | -99.7% | +51.4% | -49.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.8% | -81.3% | +50.7% | +15.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACU and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACU is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LESL's 2.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs LESL's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 2.20x | 1.51x | 1.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.31 | $18.56 | $59.95 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.50 | $0.87 | $29.38 | $2.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +7.7% | +92.0% | +87.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 47.0 | 60.4 | 42.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 133K | 47K | 264K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACU and LESL and FLXS and LCUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACU as "Buy", LCUT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -2.1% upside for FLXS (target: $54) vs -30.5% for LCUT (target: $5). For income investors, LCUT offers the higher dividend yield at 2.42% vs FLXS's 1.14%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $54.00 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — | +1.1% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | — | $0.63 | $0.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
FLXS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ACU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
ACU vs LESL vs FLXS vs LCUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Flexsteel Industries, Inc. (FLXS) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acme United Corporation (ACU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
On trailing P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Acme United Corporation at 16. 8x. On forward P/E, Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
Over the past 5 years, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) delivered a total return of +19. 5%, compared to -99. 7% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACU returned +166. 6% versus LESL's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Leslie's, Inc. 's 2. 20β — meaning LESL is approximately 176% more volatile than ACU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acme United Corporation (ACU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 120% for Lifetime Brands, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -6. 6% for Leslie's, Inc. (LESL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -881. 2% for Leslie's, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACU leads at 0. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -19. 1% for Leslie's, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACU leads at 7. 5% versus 1. 1% for LESL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACU leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
(FLXS) trades at 11. 9x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Acme United Corporation — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLXS: -2. 1% to $54. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT?
In this comparison, LCUT (2.
4% yield), ACU (1. 4% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LESL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ACU or LESL or FLXS or LCUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 1. 4% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). Leslie's, Inc. (LESL) carries a higher beta of 2. 20 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACU: +166. 6%, LESL: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACU and LESL and FLXS and LCUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ACU (Consumer Defensive) and LESL (Consumer Cyclical) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and LCUT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ACU is a small-cap deep-value stock; LESL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; LCUT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ACU, FLXS, LCUT pay a dividend while LESL does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.