Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ACU vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
ACU vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $161M | $1.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $151M | $703.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $9M | $22.91B |
| Gross Margin | 39.5% | 24.9% |
| Operating Margin | 8.5% | 4.1% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 44.7x |
| Total Debt | $29M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4K | $10.73B |
ACU vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acme United Corpora… (ACU) | 100 | 197.4 | +97.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.6 | +214.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ACU vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ACU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- Beta 0.80, yield 1.4%, current ratio 4.21x
- Lower P/E (17.3x vs 44.7x)
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs ACU's 170.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs ACU's 1.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.3x vs 44.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.7% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs ACU's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.0% vs ACU's +11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.9% ROA vs WMT's 7.9%, ROIC 7.9% vs 14.7% |
ACU vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ACU vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 4667.3x ACU's $151M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.7% (ACU) to 3.3% (WMT). On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $151M | $703.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $19M | $42.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $9M | $22.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $12M | $15.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.5% | +24.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | +4.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +3.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -41.5% | +35.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ACU leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.0x trailing earnings, ACU trades at a 64% valuation discount to WMT's 47.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.33x vs ACU's 11.21x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $161M | $1.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $189M | $1.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.96x | 47.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.27x | 44.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 11.21x | 4.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.99x | 24.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.82x | 1.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.47x | 10.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.22x | 24.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACU leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $10 for ACU. ACU carries lower financial leverage with a 0.24x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACU scores 7/9 vs WMT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.8% | +22.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.9% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3,596 | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $29M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 11.39x | 11.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,531 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,171 for ACU. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +33.0% total return vs ACU's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.5% vs ACU's 19.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.8% | +15.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.8% | +33.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | +160.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +185.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +170.9% | +505.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.2% | +37.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACU's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.6% from its 52-week high vs ACU's 89.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.31 | $134.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.50 | $91.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +96.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.7 | 58.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 17.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACU and WMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ACU as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". For income investors, ACU offers the higher dividend yield at 1.36% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 64 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
ACU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
ACU vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ACU or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 1% for Acme United Corporation (ACU). Acme United Corporation (ACU) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Acme United Corporation (ACU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ACU or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the cheapest at 17.
0x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 6x. On forward P/E, Acme United Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 4. 06x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 42x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ACU or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +185. 3%, compared to +1. 7% for Acme United Corporation (ACU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +505. 0% versus ACU's +170. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ACU or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Acme United Corporation's 0. 80β — meaning ACU is approximately 583% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Acme United Corporation (ACU) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ACU or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus 1. 1% for Acme United Corporation (ACU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Walmart Inc. grew EPS 13. 3% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for Acme United Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, WMT leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ACU or WMT?
Acme United Corporation (ACU) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACU leads at 7. 5% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACU leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ACU or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 06x versus Acme United Corporation's 11. 42x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Acme United Corporation (ACU) trades at 17. 3x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 27. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ACU or WMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Acme United Corporation (ACU) offers the highest yield at 1. 4%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is ACU or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +505. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +505. 0%, ACU: +170. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ACU and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ACU is a small-cap deep-value stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.