ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$37.36B
5Y Perf.+97.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.02B
5Y Perf.+217.3%
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$6.77B
5Y Perf.+27.5%
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.18B
5Y Perf.+10.6%
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ADM | BG | INGR | TSN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $37.36B | $24.02B | $6.77B | $24.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80.61B | $80.54B | $7.22B | $55.71B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $686M | $729M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 5.2% | 25.3% | 6.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 2.4% | 14.1% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 14.4x | 9.6x | 17.5x |
| Total Debt | $8.41B | $16.95B | $1.79B | $8.83B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $1.14B | $1.03B | $1.23B |
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ADM
BG
INGR
TSN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 317.3 | +217.3% |
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 127.5 | +27.5% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: INGR leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bunge Global S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ADM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
The Income Pick
ADM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 31 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 2.6%
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Growth Play
BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- +66.8% vs INGR's -18.4%
Best for: growth exposure
INGR
Ingredion Incorporated
The Value Play
INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 17.5x)
- 10.1% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
- 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6%
- 9.4% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs 4.1%
Best for: value and quality
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
The Income Angle
TSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BG | 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% |
| Value | INGR | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 17.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | INGR | 10.1% margin vs TSN's 0.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ADM | Beta 0.12 vs TSN's 0.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | INGR | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ADM's 2.6% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BG | +66.8% vs INGR's -18.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | INGR | 9.4% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs 4.1% |
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2020
FY 2025
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLINGRLAGGINGTSN
Who Leads Where
INGR leads in 3 of 6 categories
BG leads 1 • ADM leads 0 • TSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
0leads
ADMArcher-Daniels-Midlan…
0leads
BGBunge Global S.A.
1leads
INGRIngredion Incorporated
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BGvs ADMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
INGR4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
INGR3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
INGR8/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 11.2x INGR's $7.2B. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TSN's 0.8%. On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80.6B | $80.5B | $7.2B | $55.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $2.8B | $1.2B | $2.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $686M | $729M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $112M | $809M | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +5.2% | +25.3% | +6.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.4% | +14.1% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.9% | +10.1% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +0.1% | +11.2% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +87.8% | -2.4% | +4.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | -76.4% | +79.0% | +36.1% |
INGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
INGR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, INGR trades at a 81% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INGR's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 22.6x.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37.4B | $24.0B | $6.8B | $24.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.8B | $39.8B | $7.5B | $31.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.77x | 25.16x | 9.61x | 49.95x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.63x | 14.38x | 9.56x | 17.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.57x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.18x | 22.60x | 5.98x | 11.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.34x | 0.94x | 0.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 1.18x | 1.60x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.89x | — | 13.25x | 20.55x |
INGR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. ADM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +4.3% | +17.1% | +2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +1.6% | +9.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +3.3% | +15.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +4.5% | +16.3% | +4.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.97x | 0.41x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.4B | $15.8B | $760M | $7.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $1.1B | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $17.0B | $1.8B | $8.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.03x | 3.10x | 27.32x | 2.73x |
INGR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,840 for TSN. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs INGR's -18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs INGR's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.2% | +34.4% | -0.7% | +17.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.2% | +66.8% | -18.4% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +46.3% | +7.9% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | +49.4% | +28.8% | -1.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.4% | +140.3% | +13.5% | +23.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +13.5% | +2.6% | +13.3% |
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADM and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs INGR's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.25x | 0.25x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.75 | $133.93 | $141.78 | $69.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.81 | $71.60 | $100.71 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +92.4% | +75.8% | +97.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 51.8 | 27.3 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 1.7M | 585K | 2.7M |
Evenly matched — ADM and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADM as "Hold", BG as "Buy", INGR as "Hold", TSN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.7% upside for INGR (target: $124) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs BG's 2.23%.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | BGBunge Global S.A. | INGRIngredion Incorpo… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $133.67 | $124.25 | $70.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 25 | 21 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.2% | +3.0% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 31 | 5 | 3 | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $2.76 | $3.24 | $2.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +0.8% |
Evenly matched — ADM and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
INGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallIngredion Incorporated (INGR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ADM vs BG vs INGR vs TSN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADM or BG or INGR or TSN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bunge Global S. A. (BG) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
On trailing P/E, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Ingredion Incorporated is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -1. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus INGR's +13. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 189% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingredion Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -39. 6% for Tyson Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INGR leads at 14. 4% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INGR leads at 25. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADM or BG or INGR or TSN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) trades at 9.
6x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 9. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for INGR: 15. 7% to $124. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADM or BG or INGR or TSN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the highest yield at 3. 0%, versus 2. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. (BG).
09Is ADM or BG or INGR or TSN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, TSN: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADM and BG and INGR and TSN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(ADM: 1.6% · BG: 87.8%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ADM: 34.8x · BG: 25.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.