ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$37.36B
5Y Perf.+97.2%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.18B
5Y Perf.+10.6%
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
Agricultural Farm Products
Market Cap$24.02B
5Y Perf.+217.3%
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
Packaged Foods
Market Cap$11.41B
5Y Perf.-57.5%
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ADM | TSN | BG | HRL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $37.36B | $24.18B | $24.02B | $11.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80.61B | $55.71B | $80.54B | $12.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.08B | $453M | $686M | $489M |
| Gross Margin | 5.8% | 6.6% | 5.2% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 2.3% | 2.4% | 6.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 17.5x | 14.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $8.41B | $8.83B | $16.95B | $2.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $1.23B | $1.14B | $671M |
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
ADM
TSN
BG
HRL
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Archer-Daniels-Midl… (ADM) | 100 | 197.2 | +97.2% |
| Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) | 100 | 110.6 | +10.6% |
| Bunge Global S.A. (BG) | 100 | 317.3 | +217.3% |
| Hormel Foods Corpor… (HRL) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: HRL leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Bunge Global S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. ADM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ADM
Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
The Long-Run Compounder
ADM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 147.4% 10Y total return vs BG's 140.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 36.5%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12, yield 2.6%, current ratio 11.20x
- Beta 0.12 vs TSN's 0.33, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
TSN
Tyson Foods, Inc.
The Income Angle
TSN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: consumer defensive exposure
BG
Bunge Global S.A.
The Growth Play
BG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 32.4%, EPS growth -38.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.5%
- 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2%
- +66.8% vs HRL's -24.7%
Best for: growth exposure
HRL
Hormel Foods Corporation
The Income Pick
HRL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 34 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 5.5%
- Lower P/E (14.1x vs 14.4x)
- 4.0% margin vs TSN's 0.8%
- 5.5% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.2%
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | BG | 32.4% revenue growth vs ADM's -6.2% |
| Value | HRL | Lower P/E (14.1x vs 14.4x) |
| Quality / Margins | HRL | 4.0% margin vs TSN's 0.8% |
| Stability / Safety | ADM | Beta 0.12 vs TSN's 0.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | HRL | 5.5% yield, 34-year raise streak, vs BG's 2.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | BG | +66.8% vs HRL's -24.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | HRL | 3.7% ROA vs TSN's 1.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs 4.1% |
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLHRLLAGGINGTSN
Who Leads Where
HRL leads in 3 of 6 categories
BG leads 1 • ADM leads 0 • TSN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓TSNTyson Foods, Inc.
0leads
ADMArcher-Daniels-Midlan…
0leads
BGBunge Global S.A.
1leads
HRLHormel Foods Corporat…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BGvs ADMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
HRL3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
HRL7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
BG5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
HRL2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADM is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.6B annually — 6.6x HRL's $12.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.0% (HRL) to 0.8% (TSN). On growth, BG holds the edge at +87.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80.6B | $55.7B | $80.5B | $12.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.0B | $2.7B | $2.8B | $932M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $453M | $686M | $489M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4.8B | $1.2B | $112M | $578M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +6.6% | +5.2% | +15.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +2.3% | +2.4% | +6.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | +0.8% | +0.9% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +2.2% | +0.1% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +4.4% | +87.8% | +1.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.6% | +36.1% | -76.4% | +6.5% |
HRL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BG and HRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.8x trailing earnings, HRL trades at a 52% valuation discount to TSN's 49.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TSN's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BG's 22.6x.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37.4B | $24.2B | $24.0B | $11.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.8B | $31.8B | $39.8B | $13.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 34.77x | 49.95x | 25.16x | 23.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.63x | 17.46x | 14.38x | 14.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.18x | 11.34x | 22.60x | 13.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.47x | 0.44x | 0.34x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.63x | 1.30x | 1.18x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.89x | 20.55x | — | 21.36x |
Evenly matched — BG and HRL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADM delivers a 4.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $2 for TSN. HRL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BG's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADM scores 6/9 vs BG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.7% | +2.5% | +4.3% | +4.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +1.3% | +1.6% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +4.1% | +3.3% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.2% | +4.6% | +4.5% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.48x | 0.97x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.4B | $7.6B | $15.8B | $2.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $1.2B | $1.1B | $671M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.4B | $8.8B | $17.0B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.03x | 2.73x | 3.10x | 6.44x |
HRL leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BG five years ago would be worth $14,937 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,569 for HRL. Over the past 12 months, BG leads with a +66.8% total return vs HRL's -24.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BG at 13.5% vs HRL's -15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.2% | +17.9% | +34.4% | -8.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.2% | +26.8% | +66.8% | -24.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.7% | +45.6% | +46.3% | -40.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.2% | -1.6% | +49.4% | -44.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.4% | +23.1% | +140.3% | -23.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.4% | +13.3% | +13.5% | -15.9% |
BG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ADM and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ADM is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSN's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSN currently trades 97.8% from its 52-week high vs HRL's 65.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.33x | 0.25x | 0.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $81.75 | $69.48 | $133.93 | $31.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $46.81 | $50.56 | $71.60 | $20.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.8% | +97.8% | +92.4% | +65.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.4 | 64.5 | 51.8 | 39.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.8M | 2.7M | 1.7M | 4.2M |
Evenly matched — ADM and TSN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADM as "Hold", TSN as "Buy", BG as "Buy", HRL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 31.4% upside for HRL (target: $27) vs -22.6% for ADM (target: $60). For income investors, HRL offers the higher dividend yield at 5.54% vs BG's 2.23%.
| Metric | ADMArcher-Daniels-Mi… | TSNTyson Foods, Inc. | BGBunge Global S.A. | HRLHormel Foods Corp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $60.00 | $70.25 | $133.67 | $27.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 30 | 25 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.6% | +2.9% | +2.2% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 31 | 13 | 5 | 34 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.04 | $2.00 | $2.76 | $1.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +2.3% | 0.0% |
HRL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
HRL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BG leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallHormel Foods Corporation (HRL)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
ADM vs TSN vs BG vs HRL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADM or TSN or BG or HRL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is the stronger pick with 32. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) offers the better valuation at 23. 8x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN) a "Buy" — based on 30 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
On trailing P/E, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is the cheapest at 23.
8x versus Tyson Foods, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Hormel Foods Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
Over the past 5 years, Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) delivered a total return of +49. 4%, compared to -44. 3% for Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ADM returned +147. 4% versus HRL's -23. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Tyson Foods, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning TSN is approximately 189% more volatile than ADM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 97% for Bunge Global S. A. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bunge Global S.
A. (BG) is pulling ahead at 32. 4% versus -6. 2% for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bunge Global S. A. grew EPS -38. 4% year-over-year, compared to -40. 8% for Hormel Foods Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, BG leads at 1. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
0% net margin versus 0. 9% for Tyson Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRL leads at 5. 9% versus 1. 5% for BG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HRL leads at 15. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADM or TSN or BG or HRL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) trades at 14.
1x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Archer-Daniels-Midland Company — 4. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRL: 31. 4% to $27. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADM or TSN or BG or HRL?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hormel Foods Corporation (HRL) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 2% for Bunge Global S. A. (BG).
09Is ADM or TSN or BG or HRL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12), 2. 6% yield, +147. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADM: +147. 4%, TSN: +23. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADM and TSN and BG and HRL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TSN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; HRL is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 43%
- Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Revenue Growth>
%
(ADM: 1.6% · TSN: 4.4%)P/E Ratio<
x
(ADM: 34.8x · TSN: 49.9x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.