Insurance - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AEG vs PFG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Diversified
AEG vs PFG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $12.50B | $21.78B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29.40B | $15.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.25B | $1.19B |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 34.5% | 9.1% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $5.00B | $4.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.47B | $4.43B |
AEG vs PFG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aegon Ltd. (AEG) | 100 | 311.2 | +211.2% |
| Principal Financial… (PFG) | 100 | 260.2 | +160.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEG vs PFG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 50.4%, EPS growth 350.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -25.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.90, Low D/E 53.6%, current ratio 4.14x
PFG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 196.9% 10Y total return vs AEG's 102.7%
- 7.6% margin vs AEG's 4.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 50.4% revenue growth vs PFG's -3.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.6% margin vs AEG's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.90 vs PFG's 0.98 | |
| Dividends | 3.7% yield, vs PFG's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.2% vs PFG's +31.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs PFG's 0.4%, ROIC 4.7% vs 9.0% |
AEG vs PFG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AEG vs PFG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AEG is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.4B annually — 1.9x PFG's $15.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.6% (PFG) to 4.2% (AEG). On growth, AEG holds the edge at +106.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29.4B | $15.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $10.2B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $509M | $4.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +9.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +28.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +106.2% | -3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.2% | -40.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AEG and PFG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.1x trailing earnings, PFG trades at a 19% valuation discount to AEG's 23.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PFG's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AEG's 19.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12.5B | $21.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $14.3B | $21.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 23.61x | 19.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.06x | 10.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 13.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.46x | 12.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 1.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.53x | 1.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.98x | 4.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PFG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEG delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $10 for PFG. PFG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEG's 0.54x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEG scores 8/9 vs PFG's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.3% | +9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | +9.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.2% | +0.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.5B | -$227M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.5B | $4.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.0B | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 41.15x | 644.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AEG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AEG five years ago would be worth $20,574 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,104 for PFG. Over the past 12 months, AEG leads with a +32.2% total return vs PFG's +31.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEG at 28.6% vs PFG's 15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.1% | +13.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.2% | +31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.7% | +52.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +105.7% | +71.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.7% | +196.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.6% | +15.2% |
Risk & Volatility
AEG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AEG is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PFG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 0.98x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.41 | $103.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.61 | $75.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.5 | 62.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.9M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AEG and PFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AEG as "Hold" and PFG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -6.0% upside for PFG (target: $95) vs -9.7% for AEG (target: $8). For income investors, AEG offers the higher dividend yield at 3.66% vs PFG's 3.02%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.50 | $94.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 17 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.26 | $3.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.7% | +4.1% |
AEG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PFG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
AEG vs PFG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEG or PFG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the stronger pick with 50. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 1% for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) offers the better valuation at 19. 1x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aegon Ltd. (AEG) a "Hold" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEG or PFG?
On trailing P/E, Principal Financial Group, Inc.
(PFG) is the cheapest at 19. 1x versus Aegon Ltd. at 23. 6x. On forward P/E, Aegon Ltd. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEG or PFG?
Over the past 5 years, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) delivered a total return of +105. 7%, compared to +71. 0% for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PFG returned +196. 9% versus AEG's +102. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEG or PFG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 90β versus Principal Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 98β — meaning PFG is approximately 9% more volatile than AEG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 54% for Aegon Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEG or PFG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is pulling ahead at 50. 4% versus -3. 1% for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aegon Ltd. grew EPS 350. 0% year-over-year, compared to -21. 4% for Principal Financial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PFG leads at -3. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEG or PFG?
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
(PFG) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 6% net margin versus 3. 5% for Aegon Ltd. — meaning it keeps 7. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PFG leads at 9. 1% versus 3. 4% for AEG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AEG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEG or PFG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for Principal Financial Group, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PFG: -6. 0% to $94. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEG or PFG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Aegon Ltd. (AEG) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 3. 0% for Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG).
09Is AEG or PFG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aegon Ltd.
(AEG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 3. 7% yield, +102. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AEG: +102. 7%, PFG: +196. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEG and PFG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AEG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PFG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.