Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $13.38B | $4.86B | $20.25B | $13.63B | $22.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.91B | $981M | $4.07B | $1.03B | $3.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $191M | $54M | $327M | $106M | $265M |
| Gross Margin | 38.7% | 44.4% | 45.2% | 48.8% | 43.2% |
| Operating Margin | 11.2% | 11.9% | 14.8% | 10.0% | 29.1% |
| Forward P/E | 40.4x | 38.2x | 30.4x | 38.7x | 41.4x |
| Total Debt | $679M | $342M | $4.69B | $17M | $3.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $791M | $381M | $675M | $346M | $360M |
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Energy Ind… (AEIS) | 100 | 526.6 | +426.6% |
| Novanta Inc. (NOVT) | 100 | 132.7 | +32.7% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 284.8 | +184.8% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 881.7 | +781.7% |
| Entegris, Inc. (ENTG) | 100 | 246.6 | +146.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 21.4%, EPS growth 168.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 21.4% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4%
- 7.7% ROA vs NOVT's 3.0%, ROIC 12.2% vs 7.4%
NOVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.02, Low D/E 26.0%, current ratio 3.69x
- Beta 2.02 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage
MKSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x)
- 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 14.3% 10Y total return vs AEIS's 9.3%
- PEG 1.12 vs AEIS's 21.57
- 10.3% margin vs NOVT's 5.5%
Among these 5 stocks, ENTG doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.4% revenue growth vs ENTG's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (30.4x vs 41.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.3% margin vs NOVT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.02 vs ENTG's 2.66, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ENTG's 0.3%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +306.1% vs NOVT's +14.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs NOVT's 3.0%, ROIC 12.2% vs 7.4% |
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ONTO leads in 1 of 6 categories
MKSI leads 1 • AEIS leads 1 • NOVT leads 0 • ENTG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ONTO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 4.2x NOVT's $981M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.3% (ONTO) to 5.5% (NOVT). On growth, AEIS holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $981M | $4.1B | $1.0B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $244M | $179M | $945M | $158M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $191M | $54M | $327M | $106M | $265M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $48M | $401M | $239M | $721M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.7% | +44.4% | +45.2% | +48.8% | +43.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +11.9% | +14.8% | +10.0% | +29.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +5.5% | +8.0% | +10.3% | +8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.6% | +4.9% | +9.8% | +23.2% | +22.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +26.3% | +8.5% | +15.2% | +9.5% | +5.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +143.1% | -2.2% | +53.2% | -48.5% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 68.8x trailing earnings, MKSI trades at a 30% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ONTO offers better value at 2.85x vs AEIS's 48.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13.4B | $4.9B | $20.2B | $13.6B | $22.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.3B | $4.8B | $24.3B | $13.3B | $26.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 91.65x | 92.71x | 68.83x | 98.57x | 95.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.36x | 38.25x | 30.36x | 38.74x | 41.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 48.97x | 28.13x | — | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.60x | 27.00x | 26.70x | 68.79x | 19.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.44x | 4.96x | 5.15x | 13.56x | 7.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.97x | 3.81x | 7.49x | 6.43x | 5.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 106.31x | 100.38x | 40.74x | 45.47x | 56.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AEIS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AEIS delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $4 for NOVT. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AEIS scores 7/9 vs ONTO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | +4.1% | +12.2% | +5.2% | +6.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | +3.0% | +3.7% | +4.7% | +3.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.2% | +7.4% | +6.5% | +5.7% | +9.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.1% | +8.3% | +7.2% | +6.5% | +11.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.50x | 0.26x | 1.73x | 0.01x | 0.98x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$112M | -$39M | $4.0B | -$329M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $791M | $381M | $675M | $346M | $360M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $679M | $342M | $4.7B | $17M | $3.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 19.62x | 4.89x | 2.84x | — | 2.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AEIS and MKSI and ONTO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,573 for NOVT. Over the past 12 months, MKSI leads with a +306.1% total return vs NOVT's +14.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AEIS at 59.9% vs NOVT's -5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +58.6% | +22.6% | +78.8% | +65.2% | +65.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +220.9% | +14.6% | +306.1% | +118.9% | +88.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +308.8% | -15.2% | +266.0% | +218.0% | +87.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +292.7% | +5.7% | +66.5% | +312.6% | +30.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +928.9% | +853.7% | +750.6% | +1431.7% | +1040.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +59.9% | -5.3% | +54.1% | +47.1% | +23.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NOVT and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NOVT is the less volatile stock with a 2.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENTG's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENTG currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs ONTO's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.18x | 2.02x | 2.64x | 2.66x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $397.00 | $149.95 | $326.83 | $315.86 | $159.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $107.29 | $98.27 | $71.49 | $85.88 | $66.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.6% | +90.9% | +92.0% | +86.8% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.1 | 62.6 | 65.3 | 61.0 | 63.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 650K | 375K | 1.2M | 832K | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKSI and ENTG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AEIS as "Buy", NOVT as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", ENTG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 12.5% upside for ONTO (target: $308) vs -11.9% for AEIS (target: $310). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs AEIS's 0.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $310.00 | $150.00 | $272.86 | $308.33 | $152.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 3 | 29 | 11 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | +0.3% | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.40 | — | $0.87 | — | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
ONTO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MKSI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AEIS vs NOVT vs MKSI vs ONTO vs ENTG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is the stronger pick with 21. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (AEIS) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.
(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Onto Innovation Inc. wins at 1. 12x versus Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 's 21. 57x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +5. 7% for Novanta Inc. (NOVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ONTO returned +1432% versus MKSI's +750. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Novanta Inc.
(NOVT) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 02β versus Entegris, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning ENTG is approximately 31% more volatile than NOVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
(AEIS) is pulling ahead at 21. 4% versus -1. 4% for Entegris, Inc. (ENTG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. grew EPS 168. 5% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Onto Innovation Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NOVT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus 5. 5% for Novanta Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ENTG leads at 28. 9% versus 10. 9% for AEIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 12x versus Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 's 21. 57x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 4x for Entegris, Inc. — 11. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ONTO: 12. 5% to $308. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ENTG (0. 3% yield), AEIS (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. NOVT, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AEIS or NOVT or MKSI or ONTO or ENTG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1432% 10Y return). MKS Inc. (MKSI) carries a higher beta of 2. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ONTO: +1432%, MKSI: +750. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEIS and NOVT and MKSI and ONTO and ENTG?
These companies operate in different sectors (AEIS (Industrials) and NOVT (Technology) and MKSI (Technology) and ONTO (Technology) and ENTG (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AEIS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NOVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ENTG is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.