AENT
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation
Entertainment
Market Cap$359M
5Y Perf.-24.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AENT vs FNKO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FNKO
Funko, Inc.
Leisure
Market Cap$249M
5Y Perf.-77.3%
AENT vs FNKO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AENT | FNKO |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $359M | $249M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $918M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $22M | $-58M |
| Gross Margin | 13.9% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.9% | -3.5% |
| Forward P/E | 20.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $91M | $292M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $42M |
AENT vs FNKO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AENT
FNKO
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alliance Entertainm… (AENT) | 100 | 75.9 | -24.1% |
| Funko, Inc. (FNKO) | 100 | 22.7 | -77.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AENT vs FNKO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AENT leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AENT
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation
The Income Pick
AENT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90
- Rev growth -3.4%, EPS growth 233.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.1%
- -25.0% 10Y total return vs FNKO's -36.9%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FNKO
Funko, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, FNKO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AENT | -3.4% revenue growth vs FNKO's -13.5% |
| Quality / Margins | AENT | 2.1% margin vs FNKO's -6.3% |
| Stability / Safety | AENT | Beta 0.90 vs FNKO's 3.15, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | AENT | +226.3% vs FNKO's +12.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AENT | 5.0% ROA vs FNKO's -8.6%, ROIC 11.6% vs -7.6% |
AENT vs FNKO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAENTLAGGINGFNKO
FNKOFunko, Inc.
1leads
AENTAlliance Entertainmen…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FNKOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FNKO3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AENT9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AENT5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
AENT2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AENT1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AENT and FNKO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AENT and FNKO operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $918M in trailing revenue. AENT is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FNKO's -6.3%. On growth, FNKO holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $918M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $22M | -$58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $13M | -$7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | -3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | -6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +28.6% | +36.5% |
Evenly matched — AENT and FNKO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FNKO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AENT's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FNKO's 36.8x.
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $359M | $249M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $449M | $499M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.37x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.31x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.66x | 36.78x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.34x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.60x | 1.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.43x | — |
FNKO leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AENT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AENT delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-32 for FNKO. AENT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.88x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FNKO's 1.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AENT scores 7/9 vs FNKO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.6% | -32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.0% | -8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | -7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | -10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.88x | 1.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $90M | $250M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $42M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $91M | $292M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.33x | -1.06x |
AENT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AENT five years ago would be worth $7,490 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,752 for FNKO. Over the past 12 months, AENT leads with a +226.3% total return vs FNKO's +12.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AENT at 31.6% vs FNKO's -26.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.7% | +32.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +226.3% | +12.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.7% | -60.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.1% | -82.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -25.0% | -36.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | -26.5% |
AENT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AENT is the less volatile stock with a 0.90 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FNKO's 3.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AENT currently trades 83.1% from its 52-week high vs FNKO's 73.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.90x | 3.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.80 | $6.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.22 | $2.22 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.1% | +73.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 845K |
AENT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Consensus price targets imply 45.7% upside for FNKO (target: $7) vs 9.4% for AENT (target: $8).
| Metric | AENTAlliance Entertai… | FNKOFunko, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $6.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AENT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
AENT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FNKO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAlliance Entertainment Hold… (AENT)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AENT vs FNKO: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AENT or FNKO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the stronger pick with -3.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) offers the better valuation at 24. 4x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Funko, Inc. (FNKO) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AENT or FNKO?
Over the past 5 years, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) delivered a total return of -25.
1%, compared to -82. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AENT returned -25. 0% versus FNKO's -36. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AENT or FNKO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
90β versus Funko, Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning FNKO is approximately 249% more volatile than AENT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 88% versus 157% for Funko, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AENT or FNKO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is pulling ahead at -3.
4% versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation grew EPS 233. 0% year-over-year, compared to -342. 9% for Funko, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AENT leads at -9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AENT or FNKO?
Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
4% net margin versus -7. 4% for Funko, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AENT leads at 2. 8% versus -5. 0% for FNKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FNKO leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AENT or FNKO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNKO: 45.
7% to $6. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — AENT or FNKO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AENT or FNKO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alliance Entertainment Holding Corporation (AENT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
90)). Funko, Inc. (FNKO) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AENT: -25. 0%, FNKO: -36. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AENT and FNKO?
These companies operate in different sectors (AENT (Communication Services) and FNKO (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AENT: -6.3% · FNKO: 5.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.