FNKO vs HAS

For growth investors, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Analysts rate Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) delivered a total return of +11. 4%, compared to -79. 4% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAS returned +44. 8% versus FNKO's -38. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Funko, Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning FNKO is approximately 171% more volatile than HAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Funko, Inc. (FNKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 157% versus 6% for Hasbro, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -13. 5% for Funko, Inc. (FNKO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hasbro, Inc. grew EPS -183. 6% year-over-year, compared to -342. 9% for Funko, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HAS leads at -7. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the more profitable company, earning -6. 9% net margin versus -7. 4% for Funko, Inc. — meaning it keeps -6. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAS leads at 22. 5% versus -5. 0% for FNKO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HAS leads at 70. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FNKO: 48.

4% to $6. 50.

In this comparison, HAS (2.

9% yield) pays a dividend. FNKO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hasbro, Inc.

(HAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), 2. 9% yield). Funko, Inc. (FNKO) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAS: +44. 8%, FNKO: -38. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

HAS pays a dividend while FNKO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.