Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Regulated Water
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Regulated Water |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $1.91B | $5.13B | $1.19B | $1.89B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $1.18B | $4.05B | $1.94B | $1.40B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-99M | $-12M | $150M | $-367M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 8.2% | 8.3% | 10.7% | 3.7% | 18.2% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | -1.1% | 1.5% | -8.5% | 2.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1993.6x | 3480.2x | — | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $579M | $249M | $873M | $1.14B | $374M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $91M | $28M | $23M | $18M |
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Energy Soluti… (AESI) | 100 | 107.2 | +7.2% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 216.3 | +116.3% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 247.2 | +147.2% |
| ProFrac Holding Cor… (ACDC) | 100 | 51.9 | -48.1% |
| Select Water Soluti… (WTTR) | 100 | 241.7 | +141.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AESI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 4.1%
- Beta 0.93, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1.46x
- 3.7% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1%
- 4.1% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PUMP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +201.4% vs ACDC's +55.9%
LBRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 94.1% 10Y total return vs WTTR's 26.6%
- 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9%
- 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6%
ACDC is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.83 vs LBRT's 1.31
WTTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth -3.1%, EPS growth -33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.09, Low D/E 40.4%, current ratio 1.57x
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs ACDC's -18.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs LBRT's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +201.4% vs ACDC's +55.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.0% ROA vs ACDC's -13.1%, ROIC 2.3% vs -4.6% |
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACDC leads 1 • AESI leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • WTTR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 3.8x AESI's $1.1B. LBRT is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACDC's -18.9%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $1.2B | $4.0B | $1.9B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $154M | $549M | $251M | $217M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$99M | -$12M | $150M | -$367M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$11M | -$193M | $20M | -$95M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +8.3% | +10.7% | +3.7% | +18.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | -1.1% | +1.5% | -8.5% | +2.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -1.1% | +3.7% | -18.9% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -0.9% | -4.8% | +1.0% | -6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | -24.7% | +4.5% | -4.0% | -2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.3% | -134.2% | +16.7% | -33.3% | -4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ACDC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.6x trailing earnings, LBRT trades at a 98% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ACDC's 8.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AESI's 16.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $1.9B | $5.1B | $1.2B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $2.1B | $6.0B | $2.3B | $2.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -44.54x | 1993.59x | 35.58x | -2.86x | 84.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 3480.22x | — | 41.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.34x | 10.67x | 10.28x | 8.19x | 10.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 1.50x | 1.28x | 0.61x | 1.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 1.98x | 2.53x | 1.20x | 1.88x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 44.88x | 363.85x | 60.74x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PUMP and LBRT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LBRT delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-38 for ACDC. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACDC's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PUMP scores 5/9 vs WTTR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | -1.4% | +7.4% | -38.2% | +2.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | -1.0% | +4.0% | -13.1% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +1.4% | +2.3% | -4.6% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +1.8% | +3.0% | -6.2% | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 0.30x | 0.42x | 1.30x | 0.40x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $538M | $158M | $846M | $1.1B | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $91M | $28M | $23M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $579M | $249M | $873M | $1.1B | $374M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.00x | -0.86x | 5.24x | -1.22x | 1.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WTTR five years ago would be worth $25,837 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,633 for ACDC. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +201.4% total return vs ACDC's +55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs ACDC's -13.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +87.9% | +58.4% | +68.2% | +62.9% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +201.4% | +186.8% | +55.9% | +134.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | +132.8% | +166.1% | -35.5% | +135.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | +41.6% | +132.4% | -63.7% | +158.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | +7.2% | +94.1% | -63.7% | +26.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | +32.5% | +38.6% | -13.6% | +33.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ACDC and WTTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACDC is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WTTR currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs ACDC's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.12x | 1.31x | 0.83x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $18.50 | $34.41 | $10.70 | $17.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.64 | $4.51 | $9.90 | $3.08 | $7.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +84.1% | +92.0% | +61.5% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 51.9 | 58.7 | 55.8 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 3.5M | 4.2M | 1.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AESI and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AESI as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy", ACDC as "Hold", WTTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.4% upside for LBRT (target: $34) vs -15.7% for AESI (target: $15). For income investors, AESI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs LBRT's 1.04%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.40 | $14.75 | $34.00 | $6.00 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 30 | 19 | 6 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | +1.0% | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 4 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | — | $0.33 | — | $0.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
LBRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ACDC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AESI vs PUMP vs LBRT vs ACDC vs WTTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
(AESI) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) offers the better valuation at 35. 6x trailing P/E (3480. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. (AESI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
On trailing P/E, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the cheapest at 35. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Select Water Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
Over the past 5 years, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) delivered a total return of +158. 4%, compared to -63. 7% for ProFrac Holding Corp. (ACDC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +94. 1% versus ACDC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ProFrac Holding Corp.
(ACDC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning LBRT is approximately 59% more volatile than ACDC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 130% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
(AESI) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ProPetro Holding Corp. grew EPS 100. 6% year-over-year, compared to -174. 5% for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AESI leads at 31. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 7% net margin versus -19. 0% for ProFrac Holding Corp. — meaning it keeps 3. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WTTR leads at 2. 5% versus -6. 9% for ACDC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WTTR leads at 14. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Select Water Solutions, Inc.
(WTTR) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3438. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRT: 7. 4% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR?
In this comparison, AESI (4.
1% yield), WTTR (1. 9% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. PUMP, ACDC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AESI or PUMP or LBRT or ACDC or WTTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
(AESI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AESI: +20. 7%, PUMP: +7. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AESI and PUMP and LBRT and ACDC and WTTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (AESI (Energy) and PUMP (Energy) and LBRT (Energy) and ACDC (Energy) and WTTR (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AESI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACDC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WTTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AESI, LBRT, WTTR pay a dividend while PUMP, ACDC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.