Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Care Facilities
Communication Equipment
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Medical - Care Facilities | Communication Equipment | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $2.28B | $12.41B | $1.38B | $5.13B | $1.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $8.26B | $636M | $4.05B | $1.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-99M | $1.43B | $50M | $150M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 8.2% | 53.7% | 55.7% | 10.7% | 8.3% |
| Operating Margin | -6.2% | 25.5% | 12.1% | 1.5% | -1.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.1x | 21.8x | 3480.2x | 1993.6x |
| Total Debt | $579M | $5.04B | $148M | $873M | $249M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $878M | $101M | $28M | $91M |
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlas Energy Soluti… (AESI) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Solventum Corporati… (SOLV) | 100 | 103.0 | +3.0% |
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 91.4 | -8.6% |
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 152.8 | +52.8% |
| ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP) | 100 | 192.5 | +92.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AESI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 4.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.93, Low D/E 47.9%, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta 0.93, yield 4.1%, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta 0.93 vs HLIT's 1.51
SOLV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 1993.6x)
- 17.3% margin vs AESI's -9.3%
- 10.0% ROA vs AESI's -4.4%, ROIC 16.9% vs -0.8%
HLIT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.6%, EPS growth -54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- 269.9% 10Y total return vs LBRT's 94.1%
- 11.6% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1%
Among these 5 stocks, LBRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PUMP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +201.4% vs SOLV's +9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs PUMP's -12.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 1993.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs AESI's -9.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.93 vs HLIT's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +201.4% vs SOLV's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs AESI's -4.4%, ROIC 16.9% vs -0.8% |
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LBRT leads in 1 of 6 categories
AESI leads 0 • SOLV leads 0 • HLIT leads 0 • PUMP leads 0 • 5 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SOLV and HLIT and LBRT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOLV is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.3B annually — 13.0x HLIT's $636M. SOLV is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AESI's -9.3%. On growth, LBRT holds the edge at +4.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $8.3B | $636M | $4.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $133M | $2.9B | $88M | $549M | $154M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$99M | $1.4B | $50M | $150M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $19M | -$203M | $133M | -$193M | -$11M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.2% | +53.7% | +55.7% | +10.7% | +8.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +25.5% | +12.1% | +1.5% | -1.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +17.3% | +7.8% | +3.7% | -1.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | -2.5% | +21.0% | -4.8% | -0.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.8% | -3.0% | -27.3% | +4.5% | -24.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.3% | -91.0% | -87.5% | +16.7% | -134.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AESI and SOLV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, SOLV trades at a 100% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SOLV's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HLIT's 18.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.3B | $12.4B | $1.4B | $5.1B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.8B | $16.6B | $1.4B | $6.0B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -44.54x | 8.07x | 37.21x | 35.58x | 1993.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.07x | 21.80x | 3480.22x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.34x | 6.20x | 18.93x | 10.28x | 10.67x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.08x | 1.49x | 2.03x | 1.28x | 1.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.85x | 2.49x | 3.10x | 2.53x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 26.13x | 363.85x | 44.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SOLV and HLIT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOLV delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-8 for AESI. PUMP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SOLV's 1.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs LBRT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -8.1% | +30.7% | +11.2% | +7.4% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.4% | +10.0% | +6.5% | +4.0% | -1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | +16.9% | +9.3% | +2.3% | +1.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.9% | +19.0% | +11.2% | +3.0% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.48x | 1.00x | 0.32x | 0.42x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $538M | $4.2B | $47M | $846M | $158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $878M | $101M | $28M | $91M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $579M | $5.0B | $148M | $873M | $249M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.00x | 6.55x | 12.92x | 5.24x | -0.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LBRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LBRT five years ago would be worth $23,238 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,956 for SOLV. Over the past 12 months, PUMP leads with a +201.4% total return vs SOLV's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs SOLV's -3.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +87.9% | -9.3% | +22.6% | +68.2% | +58.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.0% | +9.4% | +38.1% | +186.8% | +201.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.1% | -10.4% | -8.9% | +166.1% | +132.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | -10.4% | +69.4% | +132.4% | +41.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.7% | -10.4% | +269.9% | +94.1% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.3% | -3.6% | -3.1% | +38.6% | +32.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AESI and HLIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AESI is the less volatile stock with a 0.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HLIT's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs SOLV's 81.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 1.05x | 1.51x | 1.31x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.61 | $88.20 | $12.38 | $34.41 | $18.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.64 | $62.38 | $7.80 | $9.90 | $4.51 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +81.2% | +99.2% | +92.0% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.8 | 60.6 | 76.9 | 58.7 | 51.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 1.3M | 1.1M | 4.2M | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AESI and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AESI as "Buy", SOLV as "Buy", HLIT as "Hold", LBRT as "Buy", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.5% upside for SOLV (target: $98) vs -15.7% for AESI (target: $15). For income investors, AESI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.13% vs LBRT's 1.04%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.40 | $97.80 | $12.50 | $34.00 | $14.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.1% | — | — | +1.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.75 | — | — | $0.33 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +2.2% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
LBRT leads in 1 of 6 categories — strongest in Total Returns. 5 categories are tied.
AESI vs SOLV vs HLIT vs LBRT vs PUMP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). Solventum Corporation (SOLV) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. (AESI) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
On trailing P/E, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the cheapest at 8.
1x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, Solventum Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
Over the past 5 years, Liberty Energy Inc.
(LBRT) delivered a total return of +132. 4%, compared to -10. 4% for Solventum Corporation (SOLV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HLIT returned +269. 9% versus SOLV's -10. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
(AESI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 93β versus Harmonic Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning HLIT is approximately 61% more volatile than AESI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 100% for Solventum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus -12. 1% for ProPetro Holding Corp. (PUMP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solventum Corporation grew EPS 221. 7% year-over-year, compared to -174. 5% for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AESI leads at 31. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
Solventum Corporation (SOLV) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
7% net margin versus -4. 6% for Atlas Energy Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOLV leads at 26. 2% versus -1. 5% for AESI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HLIT leads at 53. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Solventum Corporation (SOLV) trades at 11.
1x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3469. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOLV: 36. 5% to $97. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP?
In this comparison, AESI (4.
1% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. SOLV, HLIT, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AESI or SOLV or HLIT or LBRT or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Atlas Energy Solutions Inc.
(AESI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 4. 1% yield). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AESI: +20. 7%, HLIT: +269. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AESI and SOLV and HLIT and LBRT and PUMP?
These companies operate in different sectors (AESI (Energy) and SOLV (Healthcare) and HLIT (Technology) and LBRT (Energy) and PUMP (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AESI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SOLV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HLIT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AESI, LBRT pay a dividend while SOLV, HLIT, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.