Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
HLIT vs VIAV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
HLIT vs VIAV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $1.38B | $11.81B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $636M | $1.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $-55M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 55.7% |
| Operating Margin | 12.1% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 55.2x |
| Total Debt | $148M | $692M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $424M |
HLIT vs VIAV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) | 100 | 227.8 | +127.8% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 440.5 | +340.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HLIT vs VIAV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HLIT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.51
- Rev growth 11.6%, EPS growth -54.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.51, Low D/E 31.9%, current ratio 2.18x
VIAV is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs HLIT's 269.9%
- +466.6% vs HLIT's +38.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.6% revenue growth vs VIAV's 8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.8x vs 55.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs VIAV's 1.54, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +466.6% vs HLIT's +38.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs VIAV's -2.3%, ROIC 9.3% vs 5.5% |
HLIT vs VIAV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
HLIT vs VIAV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HLIT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VIAV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 2.1x HLIT's $636M. HLIT is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, VIAV holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $636M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $88M | $207M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | -$55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $133M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +55.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.8% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.3% | +42.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.5% | -70.2% |
Valuation Metrics
HLIT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.2x trailing earnings, HLIT trades at a 89% valuation discount to VIAV's 340.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HLIT's 18.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than VIAV's 90.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $11.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $12.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.21x | 340.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.80x | 55.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 74.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.93x | 90.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.03x | 10.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.10x | 14.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.13x | 190.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HLIT delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. HLIT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VIAV's 0.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HLIT scores 7/9 vs VIAV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | -6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.3% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.32x | 0.89x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $47M | $269M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $424M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $148M | $692M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.92x | 2.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
VIAV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VIAV five years ago would be worth $31,204 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,938 for HLIT. Over the past 12 months, VIAV leads with a +466.6% total return vs HLIT's +38.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIAV at 77.7% vs HLIT's -3.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.6% | +181.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.1% | +466.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.9% | +461.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.4% | +212.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +269.9% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.1% | +77.7% |
Risk & Volatility
HLIT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HLIT is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIAV's 1.54 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HLIT currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs VIAV's 84.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.38 | $60.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.80 | $8.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +84.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.9 | 66.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 6.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates HLIT as "Hold" and VIAV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.8% upside for HLIT (target: $13) vs -36.8% for VIAV (target: $32).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.50 | $32.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.2% | +0.1% |
HLIT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). VIAV leads in 1 (Total Returns).
HLIT vs VIAV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HLIT or VIAV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the stronger pick with 11. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) offers the better valuation at 37. 2x trailing P/E (21. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HLIT or VIAV?
On trailing P/E, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the cheapest at 37. 2x versus Viavi Solutions Inc. at 340. 3x. On forward P/E, Harmonic Inc. is actually cheaper at 21. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HLIT or VIAV?
Over the past 5 years, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) delivered a total return of +212. 0%, compared to +69. 4% for Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VIAV returned +715. 5% versus HLIT's +269. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HLIT or VIAV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus Viavi Solutions Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning VIAV is approximately 2% more volatile than HLIT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 89% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HLIT or VIAV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is pulling ahead at 11. 6% versus 8. 4% for Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -54. 2% for Harmonic Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, HLIT leads at 10. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HLIT or VIAV?
Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus 3. 2% for Viavi Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HLIT leads at 9. 3% versus 6. 5% for VIAV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HLIT or VIAV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Harmonic Inc.
(HLIT) trades at 21. 8x forward P/E versus 55. 2x for Viavi Solutions Inc. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HLIT: 1. 8% to $12. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HLIT or VIAV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is HLIT or VIAV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 5% 10Y return). Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIAV: +715. 5%, HLIT: +269. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HLIT and VIAV?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.