Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs BSVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
AFBI vs BSVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $146M | $446M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $137M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 69.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 41.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $245M |
AFBI vs BSVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs BSVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.22
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth -15.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.06x
BSVN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 169.2% 10Y total return vs AFBI's 80.7%
- NIM 4.5% vs AFBI's 3.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AFBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.37 vs 0.61 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AFBI's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs BSVN's 0.64 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs BSVN's +20.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs AFBI's 0.5% |
AFBI vs BSVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN is the larger business by revenue, generating $137M annually — 2.6x AFBI's $52M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFBI's 14.6%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $137M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $58M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $36M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +69.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +41.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +31.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | -3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AFBI and BSVN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 62% valuation discount to AFBI's 27.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AFBI offers better value at 0.37x vs BSVN's 0.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $446M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $202M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 10.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 3.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 3.25x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 10.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BSVN delivers a 18.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSVN scores 5/9 vs AFBI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +18.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +5.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$245M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $245M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AFBI and BSVN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,824 for AFBI. Over the past 12 months, AFBI leads with a +23.5% total return vs BSVN's +20.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFBI at 25.8% vs BSVN's 25.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +13.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +97.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +189.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +169.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +25.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AFBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AFBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BSVN's 0.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $50.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $37.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 62.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 11K |
Analyst Outlook
BSVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
BSVN is the only dividend payer here at 2.10% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% |
BSVN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AFBI leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
AFBI vs BSVN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or BSVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or BSVN?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Affinity Bancshares, Inc. at 27. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or BSVN?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +88. 2% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. (AFBI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BSVN returned +169. 2% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or BSVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Bank7 Corp. 's 0. 64β — meaning BSVN is approximately 192% more volatile than AFBI relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or BSVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank7 Corp. grew EPS -7. 0% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or BSVN?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 10. 9% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 14. 0% for AFBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSVN leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or BSVN?
In this comparison, BSVN (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AFBI or BSVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 2. 1% yield, +169. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSVN: +169. 2%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AFBI and BSVN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock. BSVN pays a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.