Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Financial - Credit Services
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $146M | $446M | $896.00B | $355.61B | $618.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $137M | $280.33B | $49.28B | $43.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $43M | $57.05B | $13.70B | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 69.7% | 60.0% | 61.7% | 81.3% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 41.4% | 25.9% | 29.3% | 61.1% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 10.5x | 14.4x | 25.3x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $0.00 | $942.38B | $45.49B | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $245M | $343.34B | $10.27B | $20.15B |
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 166.9 | +66.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.22, Low D/E 46.8%, current ratio 0.06x
- PEG 0.37 vs KO's 2.26
- PEG 0.37 vs 1.55
- Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
BSVN is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive and bank quality.
- Beta 0.64, yield 2.1%, current ratio 502.78x
- NIM 4.5% vs JPM's 2.2%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 169.2%
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs BSVN's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
V is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9%
- 51.7% margin vs AFBI's 14.6%
- 22.7% ROA vs AFBI's 0.8%, ROIC 29.2% vs 3.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs BSVN's -3.9% | |
| Value | PEG 0.37 vs 1.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | 51.7% margin vs AFBI's 14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs BSVN's 2.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +23.5% vs V's -12.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs AFBI's 0.8%, ROIC 29.2% vs 3.0% |
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • KO leads 1 • AFBI leads 0 • BSVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5407.2x AFBI's $52M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 51.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFBI's 14.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $137M | $280.3B | $49.3B | $43.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $58M | $81.4B | $15.5B | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $43M | $57.0B | $13.7B | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $36M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +69.7% | +60.0% | +61.7% | +81.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +41.4% | +25.9% | +29.3% | +61.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +31.4% | +20.4% | +27.8% | +51.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +26.4% | +36.0% | +25.5% | +49.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +12.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | -3.4% | +16.0% | +18.2% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AFBI and BSVN each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, BSVN trades at a 67% valuation discount to V's 31.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AFBI offers better value at 0.37x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $446M | $896.0B | $355.6B | $618.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $202M | $1.50T | $390.8B | $623.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 10.33x | 16.00x | 27.18x | 31.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.46x | 14.40x | 25.27x | 24.51x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 0.61x | 0.90x | 2.43x | 2.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 3.48x | 18.36x | 26.39x | 24.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 3.25x | 3.20x | 7.42x | 15.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.77x | 2.47x | 10.40x | 16.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 10.78x | 8.88x | 67.15x | 28.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. AFBI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AFBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +18.2% | +15.9% | +41.1% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +2.3% | +1.3% | +13.1% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +18.3% | +4.5% | +15.8% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +5.2% | +8.9% | +17.3% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | — | 2.60x | 1.33x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$245M | $599.0B | $35.2B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $245M | $343.3B | $10.3B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $0 | $942.4B | $45.5B | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 1.39x | 0.74x | 10.70x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,203 for V. Over the past 12 months, AFBI leads with a +23.5% total return vs V's -12.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs V's 13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +13.0% | -0.5% | +20.3% | -6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +20.3% | +21.8% | +17.2% | -12.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +97.2% | +138.2% | +47.0% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +189.1% | +118.2% | +65.6% | +42.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +169.2% | +465.8% | +121.1% | +330.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +25.4% | +33.6% | +13.7% | +13.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFBI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs V's 86.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.64x | 0.94x | -0.20x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $50.10 | $337.25 | $84.04 | $374.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $37.56 | $262.71 | $65.35 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +92.8% | +95.1% | +98.3% | +86.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 62.6 | 59.1 | 60.6 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 11K | 7.0M | 12.7M | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BSVN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | $339.75 | $86.13 | $368.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 61 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% | +1.9% | +2.5% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 7 | 15 | 56 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.98 | $5.95 | $2.04 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +3.9% | +0.2% | +2.2% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AFBI vs BSVN vs JPM vs KO vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
On trailing P/E, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 6x. On forward P/E, Bank7 Corp. is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank7 Corp. wins at 0. 61x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +42. 0% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Affinity Bancshares, Inc. (AFBI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -3. 9% for Bank7 Corp. (BSVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 10. 9% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 14. 0% for AFBI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 61x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), BSVN (2. 1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), V (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFBI or BSVN or JPM or KO or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFBI and BSVN and JPM and KO and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (AFBI (Financial Services) and BSVN (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. BSVN, JPM, KO, V pay a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.