Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Diversified
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $146M | $207M | $355.61B | $359M | $446M | $896.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $52M | $90M | $49.28B | $156M | $137M | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $14M | $13.70B | $44M | $43M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 61.3% | 54.7% | 61.7% | 65.9% | 69.7% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 7.0% | 29.3% | 39.8% | 41.4% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | 27.1x | 11.8x | 25.3x | 8.3x | 10.5x | 14.4x |
| Total Debt | $60M | $52M | $45.49B | $75M | $0.00 | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $119M | $10.27B | $81M | $245M | $343.34B |
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity Bancshares… (AFBI) | 100 | 270.3 | +170.3% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 312.8 | +212.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| Northeast Community… (NECB) | 100 | 438.1 | +338.1% |
| Bank7 Corp. (BSVN) | 100 | 428.0 | +328.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 341.0 | +241.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFBI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and stability.
- 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage
CZWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.50, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.50, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +52.1% vs KO's +17.2%
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- Rev growth 1.9%, EPS growth 23.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.7%
- 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0%
NECB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs BSVN's 169.2%
- PEG 0.25 vs CZWI's 2.32
- NIM 4.9% vs JPM's 2.2%
- Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.81
BSVN is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 31.4% margin vs AFBI's 14.6%
JPM doesn't hold a clear category lead here; it's more of a secondary option in this specific comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.3x vs 14.4x), PEG 0.25 vs 0.81 | |
| Quality / Margins | 31.4% margin vs AFBI's 14.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs JPM's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KO's 2.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +52.1% vs KO's +17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 15.8% vs 2.0% |
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 6 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories
NECB leads 1 • KO leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • AFBI leads 0 • JPM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BSVN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 5407.2x AFBI's $52M. BSVN is the more profitable business, keeping 31.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AFBI's 14.6%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $52M | $90M | $49.3B | $156M | $137M | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $9M | $15.5B | $63M | $58M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $14M | $13.7B | $44M | $43M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $11M | $12.6B | $51M | $36M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.3% | +54.7% | +61.7% | +65.9% | +69.7% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +7.0% | +29.3% | +39.8% | +41.4% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.6% | +16.0% | +27.8% | +28.4% | +31.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.7% | +12.4% | +25.5% | +32.5% | +26.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +12.1% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.8% | +63.0% | +18.2% | +6.8% | -3.4% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NECB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.0x trailing earnings, NECB trades at a 71% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NECB offers better value at 0.24x vs CZWI's 2.90x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $146M | $207M | $355.6B | $359M | $446M | $896.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $165M | $140M | $390.8B | $353M | $202M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.13x | 14.70x | 27.18x | 7.99x | 10.33x | 16.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.79x | 25.27x | 8.30x | 10.46x | 14.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 2.90x | 2.43x | 0.24x | 0.61x | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.37x | 15.69x | 26.39x | 5.57x | 3.48x | 18.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.92x | 2.29x | 7.42x | 2.28x | 3.25x | 3.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 1.11x | 10.40x | 1.01x | 1.77x | 2.47x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.92x | 19.90x | 67.15x | 7.07x | 10.78x | 8.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $6 for AFBI. NECB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AFBI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +7.8% | +41.1% | +13.1% | +18.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +0.8% | +13.1% | +2.2% | +2.3% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | +2.0% | +15.8% | +12.5% | +18.3% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +0.6% | +17.3% | +16.2% | +5.2% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.28x | 1.33x | 0.21x | — | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $17M | -$67M | $35.2B | -$6M | -$245M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $119M | $10.3B | $81M | $245M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $60M | $52M | $45.5B | $75M | $0 | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.49x | 0.16x | 10.70x | 1.17x | 1.39x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BSVN five years ago would be worth $28,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,560 for KO. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +52.1% total return vs KO's +17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 36.4% vs KO's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +9.6% | +24.3% | +20.3% | +15.9% | +13.0% | -0.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +23.5% | +52.1% | +17.2% | +17.5% | +20.3% | +21.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.2% | +153.7% | +47.0% | +98.4% | +97.2% | +138.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.2% | +69.0% | +65.6% | +141.9% | +189.1% | +118.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +80.7% | +149.0% | +121.1% | +500.4% | +169.2% | +465.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.8% | +36.4% | +13.7% | +25.6% | +25.4% | +33.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFBI and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFBI currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs BSVN's 92.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.22x | 0.50x | -0.20x | 0.71x | 0.64x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.53 | $22.62 | $84.04 | $26.02 | $50.10 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.20 | $12.83 | $65.35 | $19.27 | $37.56 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +94.9% | +98.3% | +99.8% | +92.8% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 51.2 | 60.6 | 67.0 | 62.6 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 14K | 41K | 12.7M | 33K | 11K | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KO and NECB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", KO as "Buy", NECB as "Hold", BSVN as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.6% upside for BSVN (target: $57) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, NECB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.75% vs CZWI's 1.73%.
| Metric | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $86.13 | — | $57.00 | $339.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 48 | 1 | 3 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% | +2.5% | +3.8% | +2.1% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 6 | 56 | 2 | 7 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.37 | $2.04 | $0.98 | $0.98 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.0% | +0.2% | +0.4% | +0.3% | +3.9% |
BSVN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NECB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AFBI vs CZWI vs KO vs NECB vs BSVN vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (8. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
On trailing P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc.
(NECB) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) delivered a total return of +189. 1%, compared to +65. 6% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NECB returned +500. 4% versus AFBI's +80. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 94β — meaning JPM is approximately -571% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Affinity Bancshares, Inc.
(AFBI) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -15. 3% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
Bank7 Corp.
(BSVN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus 10. 9% for Affinity Bancshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSVN leads at 41. 4% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BSVN leads at 70. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Northeast Community Bancorp, Inc. (NECB) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 25. 3x for The Coca-Cola Company — 17. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BSVN: 22. 6% to $57. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM?
In this comparison, NECB (3.
8% yield), KO (2. 5% yield), BSVN (2. 1% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CZWI (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. AFBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFBI or CZWI or KO or NECB or BSVN or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AFBI: +80. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFBI and CZWI and KO and NECB and BSVN and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AFBI (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and NECB (Financial Services) and BSVN (Financial Services) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AFBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NECB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BSVN is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, KO, NECB, BSVN, JPM pay a dividend while AFBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.