Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $270M | $84M | $1.24B | $6.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $1.51B | $1.45B | $7.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-544M | $91M | $729M |
| Gross Margin | 11.0% | 20.0% | 34.0% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.3% | -31.8% | 14.4% | 14.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 7.5x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $166M | $779M | $304M | $1.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $54M | $98M | $1.03B |
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forafric Global PLC (AFRI) | 100 | 99.1 | -0.9% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AFRI is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +29.3% vs SMPL's -64.8%
HAIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SMPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth -26.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- PEG 0.31 vs INGR's 0.57
- 9.0% revenue growth vs AFRI's -10.2%
INGR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 3.0%
- 13.5% 10Y total return vs SMPL's 3.7%
- Beta 0.25, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.66x
- 10.1% margin vs HAIN's -36.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.0% revenue growth vs AFRI's -10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.31 vs 0.57 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.1% margin vs HAIN's -36.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.3% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 15.5% vs -23.7% |
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
INGR leads 2 • AFRI leads 0 • HAIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 22.2x AFRI's $325M. INGR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HAIN's -36.1%. On growth, AFRI holds the edge at +13.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $1.5B | $1.4B | $7.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | -$430M | $231M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$544M | $91M | $729M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $30M | $5M | $174M | $809M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.0% | +20.0% | +34.0% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | -31.8% | +14.4% | +14.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | -36.1% | +6.3% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +0.3% | +12.0% | +11.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.5% | -6.7% | -0.3% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | -11.3% | -31.6% | +79.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.6x trailing earnings, INGR trades at a 21% valuation discount to SMPL's 12.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs INGR's 0.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $270M | $84M | $1.2B | $6.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $424M | $808M | $1.4B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.17x | -0.13x | 12.20x | 9.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 7.45x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.51x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 5.97x | 5.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.99x | 0.05x | 0.86x | 0.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 50.82x | 0.14x | 0.70x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.63x | — | 7.86x | 13.25x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AFRI's 31.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs HAIN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -103.1% | -164.7% | +5.2% | +17.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.9% | -36.8% | +3.7% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.2% | -23.7% | +8.1% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -29.2% | +9.4% | +16.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 31.22x | 1.64x | 0.17x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $154M | $725M | $206M | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $54M | $98M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $166M | $779M | $304M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.55x | -8.60x | 6.77x | 27.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INGR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INGR five years ago would be worth $12,881 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, AFRI leads with a +29.3% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INGR at 2.6% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.5% | -29.8% | -36.4% | -0.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.3% | -49.2% | -64.8% | -18.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.3% | -95.8% | -67.8% | +7.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | -98.2% | -64.3% | +28.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.5% | -98.5% | +3.7% | +13.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.5% | -65.3% | -31.5% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AFRI and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INGR is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AFRI currently trades 88.0% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 2.12x | 0.38x | 0.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.42 | $2.22 | $36.92 | $141.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.47 | $0.55 | $10.21 | $100.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.0% | +33.2% | +33.7% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 47.8 | 42.9 | 27.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9K | 1.2M | 2.8M | 585K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HAIN as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy", INGR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 15.7% for INGR (target: $124). INGR is the only dividend payer here at 3.01% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.17 | $20.17 | $124.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 24 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% | +4.1% | +3.3% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). INGR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AFRI vs HAIN vs SMPL vs INGR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the stronger pick with 9.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 2% for Forafric Global PLC (AFRI). Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) offers the better valuation at 9. 6x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
On trailing P/E, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the cheapest at 9.
6x versus The Simply Good Foods Company at 12. 2x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus Ingredion Incorporated's 0. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
Over the past 5 years, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) delivered a total return of +28.
8%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INGR returned +13. 5% versus HAIN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
25β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 743% more volatile than INGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 31% for Forafric Global PLC — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is pulling ahead at 9.
0% versus -10. 2% for Forafric Global PLC (AFRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ingredion Incorporated grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
1% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMPL leads at 35. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Ingredion Incorporated's 0. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 6x for Ingredion Incorporated — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR?
In this comparison, INGR (3.
0% yield) pays a dividend. AFRI, HAIN, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AFRI or HAIN or SMPL or INGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
25), 3. 0% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INGR: +13. 5%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AFRI and HAIN and SMPL and INGR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AFRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock. INGR pays a dividend while AFRI, HAIN, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.