Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AGCC vs SAM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Alcoholic
AGCC vs SAM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $370M | $2.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $2.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $779K | $-61M |
| Gross Margin | 49.9% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 40.0% | -3.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.6x |
| Total Debt | $140K | $38M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55K | $223M |
Quick Verdict: AGCC vs SAM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 186.0%
- 207.4% 10Y total return vs SAM's 32.0%
- 186.0% revenue growth vs SAM's 3.7%
SAM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.29
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 1.65x
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 1.65x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 186.0% revenue growth vs SAM's 3.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SAM's -2.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs AGCC's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +207.4% vs SAM's -15.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.6% ROA vs SAM's -5.0%, ROIC 47.6% vs 15.5% |
AGCC vs SAM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGCC leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SAM is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 825.5x AGCC's $3M. AGCC is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SAM's -2.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $191M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.9% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | -3.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | -2.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SAM's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGCC's 359.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $370M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $370M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 20.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 359.93x | 8.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 145.68x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.09x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCC leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCC delivers a 50.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SAM. SAM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGCC's 0.07x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.1% | -7.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.6% | -5.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +47.6% | +15.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +61.7% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $85,336 | -$186M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54,752 | $223M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $140,088 | $38M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 582.76x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGCC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGCC five years ago would be worth $30,744 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,818 for SAM. Over the past 12 months, AGCC leads with a +207.4% total return vs SAM's -15.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGCC at 45.4% vs SAM's -13.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +77.7% | +1.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +207.4% | -15.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.4% | -35.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.4% | -81.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +207.4% | +32.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +45.4% | -13.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SAM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SAM is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGCC's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SAM currently trades 76.7% from its 52-week high vs AGCC's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.73 | $264.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.66 | $185.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +72.3% | +76.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 28.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 199K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $246.86 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.4% |
AGCC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SAM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
AGCC vs SAM: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGCC or SAM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is the stronger pick with 186.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) offers the better valuation at 20. 5x trailing P/E (20. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AGCC or SAM?
Over the past 5 years, Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) delivered a total return of +207.
4%, compared to -81. 8% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCC returned +207. 4% versus SAM's +32. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AGCC or SAM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd's 1. 68β — meaning AGCC is approximately 473% more volatile than SAM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 7% for Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AGCC or SAM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is pulling ahead at 186.
0% versus 3. 7% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. (SAM). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AGCC or SAM?
Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
7% net margin versus 5. 2% for The Boston Beer Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGCC leads at 40. 0% versus 6. 9% for SAM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGCC leads at 49. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AGCC or SAM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AGCC or SAM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Boston Beer Company, Inc.
(SAM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) carries a higher beta of 1. 68 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SAM: +32. 0%, AGCC: +207. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AGCC and SAM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AGCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SAM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.