Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AGMH
AGM Group Holdings Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$437K
5Y Perf.-99.9%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.40B
5Y Perf.+110.0%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+488.0%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-51.2%

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AGMH logoAGMH
CIFR logoCIFR
MARA logoMARA
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$437K$8.40B$4.83B$589M
Revenue (TTM)$32M$224M$907M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$3M$-898M$-1.31B$137M
Gross Margin21.4%28.4%-47.7%61.9%
Operating Margin18.6%-150.7%-90.6%16.8%
Forward P/E0.1x9.2x
Total Debt$2M$2.77B$3.65B$14M
Cash & Equiv.$1M$628M$547M$95M

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AGMH
CIFR
MARA
BTBT
StockOct 20May 26Return
AGM Group Holdings … (AGMH)1000.1-99.9%
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR)100210.0+110.0%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100588.0+488.0%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10048.8-51.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. AGM Group Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CIFR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AGMH
AGM Group Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

AGMH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.68
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.68, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 1.32x
  • Beta 1.68, current ratio 1.32x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
The Banking Pick

CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 108.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • +5.8% vs AGMH's -80.1%
Best for: long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5%
  • 17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5%
ValueAGMH logoAGMHBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Stability / SafetyAGMH logoAGMHBeta 1.68 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIFR logoCIFR+5.8% vs AGMH's -80.1%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -11.7%

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AGMHAGM Group Holdings Inc.
FY 2020
Other Segments
100.0%$106,610
CIFRCipher Mining Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining
100.0%$224M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAGMHLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 28.3x AGMH's $32M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$32M$224M$907M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6M-$203M$627M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3M-$898M-$1.3B$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M-$930M-$312M-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+21.4%+28.4%-47.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.6%-150.7%-90.6%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.7%-3.7%-144.6%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+22.2%-3.1%-34.4%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-49.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+159.2%-154.5%-4.8%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AGMH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 0.1x trailing earnings, AGMH trades at a 98% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGMH's 0.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$436,590$8.4B$4.8B$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1M$10.5B$7.9B$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.14x-9.62x-3.44x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.25x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.01x37.49x5.32x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.02x9.44x1.30x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.06x
AGMH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — AGMH and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGMH scores 8/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+14.3%-115.5%-30.5%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.1%-24.7%-17.1%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+17.7%-11.7%-9.0%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+28.7%-15.6%-12.1%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–98336
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x3.31x1.05x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M$2.1B$3.1B-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1M$628M$547M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$2.8B$3.6B$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-32.12x4.73x
Evenly matched — AGMH and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for AGMH. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs AGMH's -80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs AGMH's -79.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-54.5%+27.7%+28.2%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-80.1%+584.9%-4.7%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.2%+960.8%+36.1%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+107.9%-59.5%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+108.9%-51.6%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-79.8%+119.7%+10.8%-7.1%
CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AGMH and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AGMH is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIFR currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs AGMH's 5.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.68x3.87x3.11x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$18.10$25.52$23.45$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.77$2.95$6.66$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+5.0%+81.1%+54.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10043.867.569.669.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded84K24.9M47.6M18.5M
Evenly matched — AGMH and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: CIFR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAGMH logoAGMHAGM Group Holding…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.86$16.13$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12192
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.1%+1.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AGMH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallAGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

On trailing P/E, AGM Group Holdings Inc.

(AGMH) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIFR returned +108. 9% versus AGMH's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGM Group Holdings Inc.

(AGMH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 68β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 131% more volatile than AGMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGMH leads at 18. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. AGMH, CIFR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, AGM Group Holdings Inc.

(AGMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGMH: -99. 7%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AGMH and CIFR and MARA and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (AGMH (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AGMH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AGMH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIFR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AGMH and CIFR and MARA and BTBT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AGMH: -49.9% · CIFR: 48.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.