Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $437K | $8.40B | $4.83B | $589M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32M | $224M | $907M | $164M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-898M | $-1.31B | $137M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 28.4% | -47.7% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -150.7% | -90.6% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | — | — | 9.2x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $2.77B | $3.65B | $14M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $628M | $547M | $95M |
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AGM Group Holdings … (AGMH) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) | 100 | 210.0 | +110.0% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 588.0 | +488.0% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 48.8 | -51.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGMH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.68
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, Low D/E 10.1%, current ratio 1.32x
- Beta 1.68, current ratio 1.32x
- Better valuation composite
CIFR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 108.9% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
- +5.8% vs AGMH's -80.1%
MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5%
- 17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs AGMH's -65.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.3% margin vs CIFR's -367.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.68 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs AGMH's -80.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -11.7% |
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BTBT leads in 1 of 6 categories
AGMH leads 1 • CIFR leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BTBT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 28.3x AGMH's $32M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32M | $224M | $907M | $164M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6M | -$203M | $627M | $166M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$898M | -$1.3B | $137M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7M | -$930M | -$312M | -$448M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +28.4% | -47.7% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | -150.7% | -90.6% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | -3.7% | -144.6% | +17.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.2% | -3.1% | -34.4% | -65.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -49.9% | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +159.2% | -154.5% | -4.8% | +2.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AGMH leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.1x trailing earnings, AGMH trades at a 98% valuation discount to BTBT's 9.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGMH's 0.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BTBT's 8.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $436,590 | $8.4B | $4.8B | $589M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $10.5B | $7.9B | $508M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.14x | -9.62x | -3.44x | 9.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.25x | — | — | 8.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 37.49x | 5.32x | 3.60x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | 9.44x | 1.30x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.06x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — AGMH and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGMH scores 8/9 vs MARA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.3% | -115.5% | -30.5% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | -24.7% | -17.1% | +19.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | -11.7% | -9.0% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +28.7% | -15.6% | -12.1% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 3.31x | 1.05x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | $2.1B | $3.1B | -$81M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $628M | $547M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $2.8B | $3.6B | $14M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -32.12x | 4.73x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CIFR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15 for AGMH. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs AGMH's -80.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs AGMH's -79.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.5% | +27.7% | +28.2% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -80.1% | +584.9% | -4.7% | -9.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +960.8% | +36.1% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +107.9% | -59.5% | -84.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | +108.9% | -51.6% | -60.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -79.8% | +119.7% | +10.8% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGMH and CIFR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AGMH is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIFR currently trades 81.1% from its 52-week high vs AGMH's 5.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 3.87x | 3.11x | 3.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.10 | $25.52 | $23.45 | $4.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $2.95 | $6.66 | $1.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +5.0% | +81.1% | +54.2% | +40.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.8 | 67.5 | 69.6 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 84K | 24.9M | 47.6M | 18.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CIFR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 27.0% for MARA (target: $16). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.86 | $16.13 | $5.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 19 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% |
BTBT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AGMH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AGMH vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH) offers the better valuation at 0. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
On trailing P/E, AGM Group Holdings Inc.
(AGMH) is the cheapest at 0. 1x versus Bit Digital, Inc. at 9. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.
(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -99. 8% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CIFR returned +108. 9% versus AGMH's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AGM Group Holdings Inc.
(AGMH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 68β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 131% more volatile than AGMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -65. 5% for AGM Group Holdings Inc. (AGMH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGMH leads at 18. 6% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AGMH, CIFR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AGMH or CIFR or MARA or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AGM Group Holdings Inc.
(AGMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGMH: -99. 7%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AGMH and CIFR and MARA and BTBT?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGMH (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGMH is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.