Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $312K | $426M | $414M | $2.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $784M | $265M | $1.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-19M | $48M | $244M | $200M |
| Gross Margin | 38.8% | 35.2% | 3.5% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | -10.6% | 8.2% | -82.4% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.4x | — | 41.1x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $53M | $508M | $560M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $490K | $49M | $208M | $278M |
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AgriFORCE Growing S… (AGRI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
| Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND) | 100 | 0.8 | -99.2% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 57.7 | -42.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGRI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 317.0%, EPS growth 96.0%
- 317.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6%
VITL has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.31
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 15.2%, current ratio 2.16x
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 41.1x)
- Beta 0.31 vs AGRI's 2.29, lower leverage
BYND is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 92.2% margin vs AGRI's -14.4%
- 39.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs -98.0%
FRPT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs VITL's -73.0%
- Beta 0.91, current ratio 5.54x
- -31.1% vs AGRI's -95.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 317.0% revenue growth vs BYND's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 92.2% margin vs AGRI's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs AGRI's 2.29, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -31.1% vs AGRI's -95.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 39.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -44.4% vs -98.0% |
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories
VITL leads 2 • AGRI leads 0 • BYND leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 842.5x AGRI's $1M. BYND is the more profitable business, keeping 92.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRI's -14.4%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $784M | $265M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $78M | -$187M | $165M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$19M | $48M | $244M | $200M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$90M | -$134M | $223M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.8% | +35.2% | +3.5% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -10.6% | +8.2% | -82.4% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -14.4% | +6.1% | +92.2% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -11.4% | -50.6% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +15.4% | -15.3% | +13.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.6% | -108.1% | +90.9% | +4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
VITL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 69% valuation discount to FRPT's 21.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VITL's 4.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FRPT's 16.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $311,837 | $426M | $414M | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1M | $431M | $714M | $3.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.02x | 6.61x | -0.49x | 21.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.38x | — | 41.11x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.17x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.22x | — | 16.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.59x | 0.56x | 1.50x | 2.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.05x | 1.25x | — | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 221.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FRPT delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-160 for AGRI. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FRPT's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FRPT scores 6/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -159.9% | +14.5% | — | +17.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -117.7% | +10.0% | +39.3% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -98.0% | +26.9% | -44.4% | +5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -117.1% | +26.1% | -40.3% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.15x | — | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $995,040 | $5M | $300M | $282M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $489,868 | $49M | $208M | $278M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $53M | $508M | $560M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.20x | 39.83x | -11.47x | 13.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FRPT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in VITL five years ago would be worth $4,564 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AGRI. Over the past 12 months, FRPT leads with a -31.1% total return vs AGRI's -95.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FRPT at -6.2% vs AGRI's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -52.4% | -68.1% | +1.3% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -95.4% | -73.5% | -64.9% | -31.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -38.2% | -93.1% | -17.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -54.4% | -99.2% | -68.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -73.0% | -98.6% | +517.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.9% | -14.8% | -59.1% | -6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VITL and FRPT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VITL is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGRI's 2.29 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FRPT currently trades 62.2% from its 52-week high vs AGRI's 4.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.29x | 0.31x | 1.67x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.26 | $53.13 | $7.69 | $89.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.55 | $8.40 | $0.50 | $46.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +4.0% | +17.9% | +11.6% | +62.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.6 | 38.9 | 60.7 | 29.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 387K | 3.3M | 59.5M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGRI as "Buy", VITL as "Buy", BYND as "Sell", FRPT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4889.9% upside for BYND (target: $45) vs 31.4% for FRPT (target: $73).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Sell | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.63 | $44.55 | $73.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 15 | 21 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FRPT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). VITL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AGRI vs VITL vs BYND vs FRPT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is the stronger pick with 317. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus Freshpet, Inc. at 21. 2x. On forward P/E, Vital Farms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
Over the past 5 years, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) delivered a total return of -54. 4%, compared to -100. 0% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus AGRI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. 's 2. 29β — meaning AGRI is approximately 633% more volatile than VITL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 46% for Freshpet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is pulling ahead at 317. 0% versus -15. 6% for Beyond Meat, Inc. (BYND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to 22. 0% for Vital Farms, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
Beyond Meat, Inc.
(BYND) is the more profitable company, earning 79. 8% net margin versus -239. 7% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VITL leads at 11. 6% versus -153. 2% for AGRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for Freshpet, Inc. — 30. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BYND: 4889. 9% to $44. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AGRI or VITL or BYND or FRPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VITL: -73. 0%, AGRI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGRI and VITL and BYND and FRPT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AGRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; BYND is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.