Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $9.57B | $32.50B | $112.65B | $6.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $915M | $15.28B | $29.99B | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $120M | $459M | $1.12B | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 19.2% | 12.1% | 13.6% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.1% | 5.6% | 5.8% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | 62.5x | 48.6x | 57.4x | 44.0x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $2.80B | $1.19B | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $145M | $396M | $440M | $150M |
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Argan, Inc. (AGX) | 100 | 1839.0 | +1739.0% |
| MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) | 100 | 1058.2 | +958.2% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2016.8 | +1916.8% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1519.8 | +1419.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 52.5%, EPS growth 157.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 19.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 1.63x
- Beta 1.40, yield 0.2%, current ratio 1.63x
- 52.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8%
MTZ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 0.1%
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs AGX's 19.9%
- Beta 1.30 vs MYRG's 1.70, lower leverage
MYRG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 2.64 vs MTZ's 16.37
- Lower P/E (44.0x vs 57.4x), PEG 2.64 vs 3.33
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (44.0x vs 57.4x), PEG 2.64 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.1% margin vs MTZ's 3.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs MYRG's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +312.1% vs PWR's +132.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs MTZ's 4.7%, ROIC 43.2% vs 8.9% |
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGX leads in 3 of 6 categories
MYRG leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • MTZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 32.8x AGX's $915M. AGX is the more profitable business, keeping 13.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MTZ's 3.0%. On growth, MTZ holds the edge at +34.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $915M | $15.3B | $30.0B | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $123M | $1.2B | $2.4B | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $120M | $459M | $1.1B | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $283M | $179M | $1.7B | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.2% | +12.1% | +13.6% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +5.6% | +5.8% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.1% | +3.0% | +3.7% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.9% | +1.2% | +5.6% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | +34.5% | +26.3% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.5% | +4.9% | +51.0% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 56.8x trailing earnings, MYRG trades at a 49% valuation discount to AGX's 112.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MYRG offers better value at 3.40x vs MTZ's 27.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.6B | $32.5B | $112.7B | $6.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.4B | $34.9B | $113.4B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 112.20x | 81.32x | 110.40x | 56.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 62.52x | 48.62x | 57.40x | 44.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 27.39x | 6.40x | 3.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 100.48x | 32.32x | 45.68x | 28.84x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 10.95x | 2.27x | 3.97x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.27x | 9.73x | 12.61x | 10.18x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 59.46x | 113.74x | 69.50x | 28.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGX leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGX delivers a 28.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $13 for PWR. AGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTZ's 0.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MTZ scores 8/9 vs PWR's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +28.6% | +14.2% | +13.0% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.4% | +4.7% | +4.8% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +43.2% | +8.9% | +11.8% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.0% | +10.2% | +11.3% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.84x | 0.13x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$143M | $2.4B | $748M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $145M | $396M | $440M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $2.8B | $1.2B | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 4.37x | 6.27x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGX five years ago would be worth $138,514 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $37,048 for MTZ. Over the past 12 months, AGX leads with a +312.1% total return vs PWR's +132.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGX at 158.5% vs MYRG's 47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +112.0% | +81.1% | +70.8% | +88.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +312.1% | +183.8% | +132.1% | +175.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1627.9% | +368.2% | +345.2% | +219.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1285.1% | +270.5% | +651.1% | +417.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1987.2% | +1752.9% | +3143.9% | +1680.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +158.5% | +67.3% | +64.5% | +47.3% |
Risk & Volatility
PWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MYRG's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs MYRG's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.62x | 1.32x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $742.30 | $441.43 | $788.72 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $164.00 | $143.93 | $315.45 | $152.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.0% | +93.4% | +95.2% | +89.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.8 | 76.5 | 87.0 | 80.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 398K | 942K | 1.1M | 306K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGX and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGX as "Buy", MTZ as "Buy", PWR as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -13.8% upside for PWR (target: $647) vs -39.0% for AGX (target: $421). AGX is the only dividend payer here at 0.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $420.67 | $330.25 | $647.23 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 36 | 35 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.2% | — | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 2 | 7 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.31 | — | $0.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
AGX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MYRG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AGX vs MTZ vs PWR vs MYRG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the stronger pick with 52. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) offers the better valuation at 56. 8x trailing P/E (44. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Argan, Inc. (AGX) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
On trailing P/E, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the cheapest at 56. 8x versus Argan, Inc. at 112. 2x. On forward P/E, MYR Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 44. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: MYR Group Inc. wins at 2. 64x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) delivered a total return of +1285%, compared to +270. 5% for MasTec, Inc. (MTZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 2% versus MYRG's +1724%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 32β versus MYR Group Inc. 's 1. 65β — meaning MYRG is approximately 25% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Argan, Inc. (AGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 84% for MasTec, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is pulling ahead at 52. 5% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to 12. 8% for Quanta Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AGX leads at 19. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 8% net margin versus 2. 8% for MasTec, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGX leads at 10. 1% versus 4. 4% for MYRG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGX leads at 16. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 64x versus MasTec, Inc. 's 16. 37x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) trades at 44. 0x forward P/E versus 62. 5x for Argan, Inc. — 18. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PWR: -13. 8% to $647. 23.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG?
In this comparison, AGX (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. MTZ, PWR, MYRG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AGX or MTZ or PWR or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Argan, Inc.
(AGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1987% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGX: +1987%, PWR: +31. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGX and MTZ and PWR and MYRG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AGX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTZ is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.