Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) vs Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Stability / Safety | AIEV | Beta 0.38 vs TSLA's 2.16, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | TSLA | +37.4% vs AIEV's -40.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TSLA | 2.8% ROA vs AIEV's -12.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Thunder Power Holdings is an electric vehicle manufacturer that develops and produces a range of EVs including sedans, SUVs, and compact city cars. It generates revenue primarily through vehicle sales—with its long-range sedan and SUV models likely representing the bulk of sales—and potentially through future service or charging offerings. The company's competitive advantage lies in its focus on long-range battery technology and its diverse product portfolio targeting multiple vehicle segments.
Tesla is an electric vehicle and clean energy company that designs, manufactures, and sells battery-electric vehicles, solar energy systems, and energy storage solutions. It generates most of its revenue from automotive sales—roughly 85%—with the remainder coming from energy generation/storage products and regulatory credit sales. Tesla's key competitive advantage lies in its vertically integrated manufacturing, proprietary battery technology, and industry-leading Supercharger network that creates a comprehensive ecosystem.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
AIEV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Valuation Metrics). TSLA leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TSLA and AIEV operate at a comparable scale, with $94.8B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $94.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | $10.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $3.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $6.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +18.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +4.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +6.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.4% | -63.5% |
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $1.51T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $1.50T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.30x | 372.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 202.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 9.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 142.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 15.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.95x | 17.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 242.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TSLA delivers a 4.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AIEV. AIEV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TSLA's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TSLA scores 6/9 vs AIEV's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.7% | +4.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.7% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$49,161 | -$8.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $52,616 | $16.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3,455 | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 16.62x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth $16,808 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $178 for AIEV. Over the past 12 months, TSLA leads with a +37.4% total return vs AIEV's -40.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TSLA at 25.1% vs AIEV's -73.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.0% | -8.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.8% | +37.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +95.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +68.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.2% | +3044.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.9% | +25.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AIEV is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TSLA's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TSLA currently trades 80.7% from its 52-week high vs AIEV's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 2.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.37 | $498.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.01 | $214.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.3% | +80.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.5 | 44.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 18K | 52.3M |
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | AIEVThunder Power Hol… | TSLATesla, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $458.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 80 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Jun 24 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | 100 | 1.55 | -98.5% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 100 | 201 | +101.0% |
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) returned +68% over 5 years vs Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV)'s -98%. A $10,000 investment in TSLA 5 years ago would be worth $16,808 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | $0.00 | $0.00 | — |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | $7.0B | $94.8B | +1254.6% |
Tesla, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7.0B (2016) to $94.8B (2025) — a 33.6% CAGR.
Chart 3P/E Ratio History — 5 Years
| Stock | 2021 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | 216.1 | 416.4 | +92.7% |
Tesla, Inc. has traded in a 34x–416x P/E range over 5 years; current trailing P/E is ~373x.
Chart 4EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thunder Power Holdi… (AIEV) | -0.02 | -0.06 | -203.0% |
| Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) | -0.31 | 1.08 | +448.4% |
Tesla, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.31 (2016) to $1.08 (2025).
Chart 5Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. generated $-1M FCF in 2024 (-142% vs 2021). Tesla, Inc. generated $6B FCF in 2025 (+79% vs 2021).
AIEV vs TSLA: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIEV or TSLA a better buy right now?
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) offers the better valuation at 372.7x trailing P/E (202.8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) a "Hold" — based on 80 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIEV or TSLA?
Over the past 5 years, Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) delivered a total return of +68.1%, compared to -98.2% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV). A $10,000 investment in TSLA five years ago would be worth approximately $17K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TSLA returned +30.4% versus AIEV's -98.2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIEV or TSLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.38β versus Tesla, Inc.'s 2.16β — meaning TSLA is approximately 473% more volatile than AIEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Tesla, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — AIEV or TSLA?
Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) is the more profitable company, earning 4.0% net margin versus 0.0% for Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4.0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TSLA leads at 4.6% versus 0.0% for AIEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TSLA leads at 18.0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — AIEV or TSLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend. All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is AIEV or TSLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Thunder Power Holdings, Inc. (AIEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.38)). Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) carries a higher beta of 2.16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIEV: -98.2%, TSLA: +30.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between AIEV and TSLA?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.