Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
Communication Equipment
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $89M | $1M | $520M | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $36M | $351M | $452M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-7M | $88M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 43.6% | 14.9% | 80.2% | 29.5% |
| Operating Margin | -14.6% | -15.7% | 42.9% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 5.0x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $10M | $580M | $11M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $2M | $75M | $169M |
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Airgain, Inc. (AIRG) | 100 | 57.5 | -42.5% |
| Taoping Inc. (TAOP) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Consensus Cloud Sol… (CCSI) | 100 | 79.4 | -20.6% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 209.6 | +109.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 30.3%, current ratio 1.98x
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 1.98x
- Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage
TAOP lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CCSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.51
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 37.7x)
- 25.1% margin vs TAOP's -19.6%
- 13.2% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs -27.1%
GILT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 358.8% 10Y total return vs AIRG's -9.4%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0%
- +186.3% vs TAOP's -78.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs TAOP's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 37.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.1% margin vs TAOP's -19.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs TAOP's 2.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +186.3% vs TAOP's -78.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs TAOP's -21.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs -27.1% |
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
GILT leads 1 • AIRG leads 1 • TAOP leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GILT is the larger business by revenue, generating $452M annually — 12.5x TAOP's $36M. CCSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TAOP's -19.6%. On growth, GILT holds the edge at +75.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $36M | $351M | $452M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$4M | $164M | $40M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$7M | $88M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | -$3M | $112M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.6% | +14.9% | +80.2% | +29.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -14.6% | -15.7% | +42.9% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.5% | -19.6% | +25.1% | +4.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -8.1% | +32.0% | +2.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | -2.6% | +1.5% | +75.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.5% | -51.7% | +21.5% | -38.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CCSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.5x trailing earnings, CCSI trades at a 88% valuation discount to GILT's 55.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCSI's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GILT's 27.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $89M | $1M | $520M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $90M | $9M | $1.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.43x | -0.16x | 6.50x | 55.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 4.99x | 37.68x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 6.07x | 27.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 0.04x | 1.49x | 3.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.03x | 0.08x | 39.95x | 2.27x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 4.92x | 150.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CCSI delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-47 for TAOP. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CCSI's 42.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCSI scores 5/9 vs TAOP's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.4% | -46.7% | +52.9% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.1% | -21.7% | +13.2% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.8% | -27.1% | +22.2% | +5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.2% | -38.0% | +26.8% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.50x | 42.14x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1M | $8M | $506M | -$158M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $2M | $75M | $169M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $10M | $580M | $11M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -52.63x | 5.95x | 5.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GILT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GILT five years ago would be worth $19,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7 for TAOP. Over the past 12 months, GILT leads with a +186.3% total return vs TAOP's -78.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GILT at 51.4% vs TAOP's -80.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +77.7% | -6.8% | +30.2% | +40.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +78.6% | -78.3% | +26.8% | +186.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +25.9% | -99.3% | -21.8% | +247.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.3% | -99.9% | -20.6% | +95.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.4% | -99.9% | -20.6% | +358.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.0% | -80.9% | -7.9% | +51.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AIRG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIRG is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TAOP's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AIRG currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs TAOP's 6.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 2.30x | 1.51x | 2.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.39 | $20.10 | $31.66 | $20.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.00 | $1.18 | $19.24 | $5.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +6.4% | +89.3% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.3 | 53.1 | 51.0 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 90K | 20K | 123K | 650K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CCSI as "Buy", GILT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -11.6% upside for CCSI (target: $25) vs -62.8% for GILT (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $25.00 | $7.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.4% | 0.0% |
CCSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GILT leads in 1 (Total Returns).
AIRG vs TAOP vs CCSI vs GILT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E (5. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. (CCSI) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
On trailing P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the cheapest at 6. 5x versus Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. at 55. 4x. On forward P/E, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
Over the past 5 years, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) delivered a total return of +95. 0%, compared to -99. 9% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GILT returned +358. 8% versus TAOP's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Taoping Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning TAOP is approximately 695% more volatile than AIRG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 42% for Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -16. 0% for Taoping Inc. (TAOP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Airgain, Inc. grew EPS 31. 6% year-over-year, compared to -1870. 0% for Taoping Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 2% net margin versus -32. 7% for Taoping Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CCSI leads at 43. 0% versus -29. 0% for TAOP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CCSI leads at 79. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Consensus Cloud Solutions, Inc.
(CCSI) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CCSI: -11. 6% to $25. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AIRG or TAOP or CCSI or GILT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Airgain, Inc.
(AIRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29)). Taoping Inc. (TAOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AIRG: -9. 4%, TAOP: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRG and TAOP and CCSI and GILT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TAOP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.