Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRS vs ESTA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
AIRS vs ESTA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $223M | $2.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $211M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-51M |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 69.3% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | -18.5% |
| Total Debt | $105M | $264M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $76M |
AIRS vs ESTA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirSculpt Technolog… (AIRS) | 100 | 22.5 | -77.5% |
| Establishment Labs … (ESTA) | 100 | 91.6 | -8.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRS vs ESTA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and dividends.
- -11.4% margin vs ESTA's -24.2%
- 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- -9.0% ROA vs ESTA's -15.0%, ROIC -0.8% vs -14.6%
ESTA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.30
- Rev growth 27.1%, EPS growth 42.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 201.7% 10Y total return vs AIRS's -75.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.1% revenue growth vs AIRS's -7.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -11.4% margin vs ESTA's -24.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs AIRS's 3.37 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +126.2% vs AIRS's +55.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -9.0% ROA vs ESTA's -15.0%, ROIC -0.8% vs -14.6% |
AIRS vs ESTA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIRS vs ESTA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AIRS and ESTA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ESTA and AIRS operate at a comparable scale, with $211M and $158M in trailing revenue. AIRS is the more profitable business, keeping -11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESTA's -24.2%. On growth, ESTA holds the edge at +45.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $211M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$32M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$51M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$57M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.0% | +69.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -24.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -27.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | +45.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | +92.6% |
Valuation Metrics
AIRS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $223M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $320M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -25.50x | -43.42x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.74x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 10.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.60x | 93.95x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AIRS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AIRS delivers a -21.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-22 in annual profit, vs $-2 for ESTA. AIRS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ESTA's 11.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ESTA scores 4/9 vs AIRS's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | -2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.0% | -15.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | -14.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | -14.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 11.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $97M | $189M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $76M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $264M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.82x | -1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESTA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESTA five years ago would be worth $10,822 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,505 for AIRS. Over the past 12 months, ESTA leads with a +126.2% total return vs AIRS's +55.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESTA at 3.3% vs AIRS's -12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.0% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +55.2% | +126.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +10.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +8.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +201.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.0% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ESTA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESTA is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIRS's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESTA currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs AIRS's 29.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.37x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $83.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $32.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.8% | +89.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.2 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 463K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AIRS as "Hold" and ESTA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.1% upside for AIRS (target: $6) vs 13.8% for ESTA (target: $85). AIRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.12% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
AIRS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ESTA leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
AIRS vs ESTA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRS or ESTA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
(ESTA) is the stronger pick with 27. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS). Analysts rate Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. (ESTA) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AIRS or ESTA?
Over the past 5 years, Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
(ESTA) delivered a total return of +8. 2%, compared to -75. 0% for AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESTA returned +201. 7% versus AIRS's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AIRS or ESTA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
(ESTA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning AIRS is approximately 158% more volatile than ESTA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 132% versus 11% for Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AIRS or ESTA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
(ESTA) is pulling ahead at 27. 1% versus -7. 9% for AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. grew EPS 42. 7% year-over-year, compared to -77. 4% for AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIRS leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AIRS or ESTA?
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
(AIRS) is the more profitable company, earning -4. 6% net margin versus -24. 2% for Establishment Labs Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps -4. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AIRS leads at -1. 0% versus -18. 5% for ESTA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESTA leads at 69. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AIRS or ESTA?
In this comparison, AIRS (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ESTA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is AIRS or ESTA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Establishment Labs Holdings Inc.
(ESTA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+201. 7% 10Y return). AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. (AIRS) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESTA: +201. 7%, AIRS: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AIRS and ESTA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ESTA is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.