ALAR vs RDWR

For growth investors, Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) is the stronger pick with 20. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Radware Ltd. (RDWR). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Radware Ltd. (RDWR) a "Hold" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) is the cheapest at 9. 4x versus Radware Ltd. at 63. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Radware Ltd.

(RDWR) delivered a total return of +1. 9%, compared to -36. 6% for Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDWR returned +164. 8% versus ALAR's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Radware Ltd.

(RDWR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Alarum Technologies Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning ALAR is approximately 102% more volatile than RDWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Radware Ltd. (RDWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 6% for Alarum Technologies Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) is pulling ahead at 20. 9% versus 9. 8% for Radware Ltd. (RDWR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Radware Ltd. grew EPS 221. 4% year-over-year, compared to 160. 7% for Alarum Technologies Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALAR leads at 45. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Alarum Technologies Ltd.

(ALAR) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus 6. 7% for Radware Ltd. — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALAR leads at 21. 1% versus 3. 8% for RDWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RDWR leads at 80. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Radware Ltd.

(RDWR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +164. 8% 10Y return). Alarum Technologies Ltd. (ALAR) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDWR: +164. 8%, ALAR: -99. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALAR is a small-cap high-growth stock; RDWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.