Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALDF vs NHIC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Asset Management
ALDF vs NHIC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $317M | $220M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4K | $3M |
| Forward P/E | 168.5x | 524.4x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $986K |
ALDF vs NHIC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aldel Financial II … (ALDF) | 100 | 104.2 | +4.2% |
| NewHold Investment … (NHIC) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALDF vs NHIC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALDF is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs NHIC's 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta -0.02, current ratio 60.25x
- Beta -0.02, current ratio 60.25x
NHIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for bank quality.
- NIM 1.3% vs ALDF's 0.9%
- 1.3% margin vs ALDF's 0.9%
- +5.2% vs ALDF's +4.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Value | Lower P/E (168.5x vs 524.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.3% margin vs ALDF's 0.9% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.2% vs ALDF's +4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs ALDF's 0.0% |
ALDF vs NHIC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALDF and NHIC operate at a comparable scale, with $0 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $833,081 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $3M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALDF and NHIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 168.5x trailing earnings, ALDF trades at a 68% valuation discount to NHIC's 524.4x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $220M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $316M | $219M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 168.46x | 524.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.35x | 1.07x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9999.00x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALDF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NHIC delivers a 1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $0 for ALDF. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALDF scores 5/9 vs NHIC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.0% | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.0% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1M | -$986,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $986,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALDF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALDF five years ago would be worth $10,737 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,614 for NHIC. Over the past 12 months, NHIC leads with a +5.2% total return vs ALDF's +4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALDF at 2.4% vs NHIC's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.3% | +1.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.0% | +5.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.4% | +6.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.4% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALDF leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALDF is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NHIC's 0.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.66 | $10.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.20 | $9.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.8 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 20K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ALDF leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 1 category is tied.
ALDF vs NHIC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALDF or NHIC a better buy right now?
Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) offers the better valuation at 168. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALDF or NHIC?
On trailing P/E, Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the cheapest at 168. 5x versus NewHold Investment Corp III at 524. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALDF or NHIC?
Over the past 5 years, Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) delivered a total return of +7. 4%, compared to +6. 1% for NewHold Investment Corp III (NHIC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALDF returned +7. 4% versus NHIC's +6. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALDF or NHIC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus NewHold Investment Corp III's 0. 03β — meaning NHIC is approximately -228% more volatile than ALDF relative to the S&P 500.
05Which has better profit margins — ALDF or NHIC?
Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus 0. 0% for NewHold Investment Corp III — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALDF leads at 0. 0% versus 0. 0% for NHIC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALDF leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ALDF or NHIC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ALDF or NHIC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aldel Financial II Inc.
(ALDF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALDF: +7. 4%, NHIC: +6. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ALDF and NHIC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.