Agricultural - Machinery
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALG vs NFBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
ALG vs NFBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural - Machinery | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.08B | $587M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.63B | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $101M | $39M |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.2% | 16.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 10.4x |
| Total Debt | $220M | $760M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $310M | $168M |
ALG vs NFBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) | 100 | 165.4 | +65.4% |
| Northfield Bancorp,… (NFBK) | 100 | 128.5 | +28.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALG vs NFBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.7%
- 219.5% 10Y total return vs NFBK's 19.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 19.2%, current ratio 4.57x
NFBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -16.3%
- 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs ALG's -1.5%
- Lower P/E (10.4x vs 16.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% NII/revenue growth vs ALG's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.4x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.9% margin vs ALG's 6.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs NFBK's 1.00, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs NFBK's 3.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.1% vs ALG's -0.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs NFBK's 0.7%, ROIC 10.8% vs 2.0% |
ALG vs NFBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALG vs NFBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALG is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 6.5x NFBK's $251M. NFBK is the more profitable business, keeping 11.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALG's 6.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $61M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $101M | $39M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +16.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +11.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | +68.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALG and NFBK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, NFBK trades at a 2% valuation discount to ALG's 19.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALG's 10.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NFBK's 24.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.1B | $587M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.89x | 19.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.54x | 10.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.66x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.19x | 24.18x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.30x | 2.34x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.80x | 0.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 14.15x | 19.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALG leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALG delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $5 for NFBK. ALG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NFBK's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFBK scores 7/9 vs ALG's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.9% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.2% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.8% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 1.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$89M | $592M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $310M | $168M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $220M | $760M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.38x | 0.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFBK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALG five years ago would be worth $10,787 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,970 for NFBK. Over the past 12 months, NFBK leads with a +30.1% total return vs ALG's -0.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFBK at 18.3% vs ALG's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +26.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.2% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.2% | +65.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +7.9% | -0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +219.5% | +19.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.4% | +18.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALG and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALG is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NFBK's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NFBK currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs ALG's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $233.29 | $14.21 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $156.29 | $9.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.2% | +98.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.0 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 171K | 261K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ALG and NFBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALG as "Buy" and NFBK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 11.2% upside for ALG (target: $190) vs 3.2% for NFBK (target: $15). For income investors, NFBK offers the higher dividend yield at 3.73% vs ALG's 0.70%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $190.00 | $14.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +3.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $0.52 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.2% |
NFBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ALG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ALG vs NFBK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALG or NFBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALG or NFBK?
On trailing P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the cheapest at 19. 5x versus Alamo Group Inc. at 19. 9x. On forward P/E, Northfield Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALG or NFBK?
Over the past 5 years, Alamo Group Inc.
(ALG) delivered a total return of +7. 9%, compared to -0. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALG returned +219. 5% versus NFBK's +19. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALG or NFBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alamo Group Inc.
(ALG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus Northfield Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 00β — meaning NFBK is approximately 1% more volatile than ALG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alamo Group Inc. (ALG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 108% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALG or NFBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -1. 5% for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alamo Group Inc. grew EPS -10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -16. 3% for Northfield Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALG or NFBK?
Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 9% net margin versus 6. 5% for Alamo Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFBK leads at 16. 1% versus 9. 5% for ALG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NFBK leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALG or NFBK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Northfield Bancorp, Inc.
(NFBK) trades at 10. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for Alamo Group Inc. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALG: 11. 2% to $190. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALG or NFBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Northfield Bancorp, Inc. (NFBK) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 7% for Alamo Group Inc. (ALG).
09Is ALG or NFBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alamo Group Inc.
(ALG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), 0. 7% yield, +219. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALG: +219. 5%, NFBK: +19. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALG and NFBK?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALG (Industrials) and NFBK (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NFBK is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.