Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Trucking
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $4.32B | $9.98B | $7.04B | $3.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.71B | $2.35B | $3.73B | $5.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $102M | $254M | $-278M | $-105M |
| Gross Margin | 37.0% | 37.7% | 37.9% | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | 16.9% | -2.5% | -0.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.8x | 24.8x | 16.2x | 1152.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.00B | $498M | $2.17B | $861M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $150M | $364M | $222M | $18M |
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPX Technologies, I… (SPXC) | 100 | 302.2 | +202.2% |
| The Middleby Corpor… (MIDD) | 100 | 108.0 | +8.0% |
| RXO, Inc. (RXO) | 100 | 95.5 | -4.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPXC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 11.4% 10Y total return vs ALH's 1.7%
- 10.8% margin vs MIDD's -7.4%
- +29.0% vs ALH's +1.7%
- 7.1% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs 8.7%
MIDD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.18
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 78.3%, current ratio 2.57x
- Beta 1.18, current ratio 2.57x
- Lower P/E (16.2x vs 1152.3x)
RXO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 26.2%, EPS growth 72.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.2%
- 26.2% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.2% revenue growth vs MIDD's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 1152.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs MIDD's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.18 vs RXO's 2.66 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.0% vs ALH's +1.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs MIDD's -4.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs 8.7% |
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPXC leads in 3 of 6 categories
MIDD leads 1 • ALH leads 0 • RXO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPXC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RXO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 3.4x ALH's $1.7B. SPXC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MIDD's -7.4%. On growth, SPXC holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.7B | $2.3B | $3.7B | $5.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $412M | $492M | $26M | $84M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $102M | $254M | -$278M | -$105M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $158M | $385M | $559M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +37.7% | +37.9% | +17.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.6% | +16.9% | -2.5% | -0.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.0% | +10.8% | -7.4% | -1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +16.4% | +15.0% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.1% | +17.4% | -14.5% | -0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.9% | +8.2% | -64.3% | -16.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MIDD and RXO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.3x trailing earnings, SPXC trades at a 19% valuation discount to ALH's 48.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MIDD's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RXO's 38.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.3B | $10.0B | $7.0B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $10.1B | $9.0B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 48.56x | 39.33x | -28.07x | -33.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.77x | 24.83x | 16.20x | 1152.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.07x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.83x | 20.09x | 13.07x | 38.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.53x | 4.41x | 2.20x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.72x | 4.31x | 2.81x | 2.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 27.36x | 41.40x | 12.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPXC leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALH delivers a 177.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $177 in annual profit, vs $-9 for MIDD. SPXC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALH's 5.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALH scores 7/9 vs MIDD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +177.3% | +12.4% | -8.5% | -6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +7.1% | -4.1% | -3.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +13.4% | +8.7% | -0.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.6% | +14.0% | +10.1% | -0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.09x | 0.22x | 0.78x | 0.56x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $134M | $2.0B | $843M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $150M | $364M | $222M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $498M | $2.2B | $861M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.68x | 10.50x | -1.20x | -3.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SPXC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPXC five years ago would be worth $33,298 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,955 for MIDD. Over the past 12 months, SPXC leads with a +29.0% total return vs ALH's +1.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SPXC at 39.8% vs ALH's 0.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.0% | -2.1% | +0.2% | +56.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.7% | +29.0% | +2.8% | +24.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +173.3% | +7.8% | +6.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +233.0% | -10.5% | -4.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.7% | +1142.1% | +31.7% | -4.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.6% | +39.8% | +2.5% | +2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALH and MIDD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MIDD is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXO's 2.66 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALH currently trades 91.9% from its 52-week high vs SPXC's 80.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.31x | 1.18x | 2.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $27.48 | $246.68 | $169.44 | $23.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.64 | $147.39 | $110.82 | $10.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +80.7% | +89.1% | +85.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.5 | 43.7 | 61.8 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 906K | 475K | 565K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
MIDD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALH as "Hold", SPXC as "Buy", MIDD as "Buy", RXO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.5% upside for MIDD (target: $193) vs -2.7% for RXO (target: $20).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $31.80 | $252.00 | $192.50 | $19.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 12 | 20 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | +10.3% | +0.0% |
SPXC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MIDD leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
ALH vs SPXC vs MIDD vs RXO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RXO, Inc.
(RXO) is the stronger pick with 26. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) offers the better valuation at 39. 3x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
On trailing P/E, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the cheapest at 39. 3x versus Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. at 48. 6x. On forward P/E, The Middleby Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
Over the past 5 years, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) delivered a total return of +233. 0%, compared to -10. 5% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SPXC returned +1142% versus RXO's -4. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
18β versus RXO, Inc. 's 2. 66β — meaning RXO is approximately 125% more volatile than MIDD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPX Technologies, Inc. (SPXC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 5% for Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RXO, Inc.
(RXO) is pulling ahead at 26. 2% versus -17. 4% for The Middleby Corporation (MIDD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RXO, Inc. grew EPS 72. 8% year-over-year, compared to -168. 1% for The Middleby Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPXC leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -8. 7% for The Middleby Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALH leads at 18. 9% versus -0. 1% for RXO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MIDD leads at 39. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Middleby Corporation (MIDD) trades at 16.
2x forward P/E versus 1152. 3x for RXO, Inc. — 1136. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MIDD: 27. 5% to $192. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is ALH or SPXC or MIDD or RXO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SPX Technologies, Inc.
(SPXC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1142% 10Y return). RXO, Inc. (RXO) carries a higher beta of 2. 66 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPXC: +1142%, RXO: -4. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALH and SPXC and MIDD and RXO?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALH (Consumer Cyclical) and SPXC (Industrials) and MIDD (Industrials) and RXO (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPXC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MIDD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RXO is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.