Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $2.78B | $5.88B | $356.49B | $2.22B | $30.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22M | $0.00 | $61.16B | $158M | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-245M | $-464M | $4.23B | $-107M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | 96.3% | — | 70.2% | 89.1% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -20.6% | — | 26.7% | -80.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 14.2x | — | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $37M | $98K | $69.07B | $3M | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $90M | $714M | $5.23B | $197M | $1.98B |
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alumis Inc. Common … (ALMS) | 100 | 177.9 | +77.9% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 109.6 | +9.6% |
| AbbVie Inc. (ABBV) | 100 | 117.5 | +17.5% |
| Day One Biopharmace… (DAWN) | 100 | 155.6 | +55.6% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALMS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +344.7% vs ABBV's +12.2%
Among these 5 stocks, IMVT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
ABBV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 3.3%
- 293.8% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 190.9%
- 3.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
DAWN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.6%, EPS growth -2.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 8.02x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 8.02x
- 20.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 8.3% margin vs ALMS's -11.1%
- 4.7% ROA vs ALMS's -57.6%, ROIC 8.7% vs -184.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.6% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs ALMS's -11.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs ALMS's 1.52, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +344.7% vs ABBV's +12.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs ALMS's -57.6%, ROIC 8.7% vs -184.1% |
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories
IQV leads 1 • ALMS leads 1 • DAWN leads 1 • IMVT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ABBV and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $61.2B and $0 in trailing revenue. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALMS's -11.1%. On growth, DAWN holds the edge at +83.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22M | $0 | $61.2B | $158M | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$453M | -$487M | $24.5B | -$124M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$245M | -$464M | $4.2B | -$107M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$373M | -$423M | $18.7B | -$108M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.3% | — | +70.2% | +89.1% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | — | +26.7% | -80.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.1% | — | +6.9% | -67.8% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.9% | — | +30.6% | -68.0% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +10.0% | +83.9% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +38.7% | +19.7% | +57.4% | +70.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.8x trailing earnings, IQV trades at a 73% valuation discount to ABBV's 85.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IQV's 13.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ABBV's 14.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.8B | $5.9B | $356.5B | $2.2B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.7B | $5.2B | $420.3B | $2.0B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.27x | -10.60x | 85.04x | -20.70x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 14.17x | — | 13.96x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 14.89x | — | 12.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 115.60x | — | 5.83x | 14.06x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 66.77x | 6.20x | — | 5.05x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 20.01x | — | 14.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ABBV delivers a 62.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $62 in annual profit, vs $-76 for ALMS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABBV scores 6/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -75.5% | -47.1% | +62.1% | -23.4% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.6% | -44.1% | +3.1% | -20.7% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -184.1% | — | +23.9% | -30.5% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -144.4% | -66.1% | +21.5% | -26.7% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.00x | — | 0.01x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$53M | -$714M | $63.8B | -$194M | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $90M | $714M | $5.2B | $197M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $37M | $98,000 | $69.1B | $3M | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 3.28x | — | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ABBV five years ago would be worth $19,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,720 for IQV. Over the past 12 months, ALMS leads with a +344.7% total return vs ABBV's +12.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALMS at 21.2% vs IQV's -2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +164.2% | +11.7% | -10.6% | +143.3% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +344.7% | +102.4% | +12.2% | +218.5% | +16.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.9% | +49.8% | +49.7% | +65.1% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.9% | +84.4% | +99.6% | -8.4% | -22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.9% | +190.9% | +293.8% | -8.4% | +166.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.2% | +14.4% | +14.4% | +18.2% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
DAWN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAWN is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALMS's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAWN currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs IQV's 72.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.36x | 0.28x | 0.25x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.60 | $30.09 | $244.81 | $21.53 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.76 | $13.36 | $176.57 | $5.64 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +77.3% | +96.2% | +82.3% | +100.0% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.0 | 50.6 | 43.9 | 80.3 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 1.4M | 5.8M | 5.0M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
ABBV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALMS as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ABBV as "Buy", DAWN as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.5% upside for ALMS (target: $38) vs -0.1% for DAWN (target: $22). ABBV is the only dividend payer here at 3.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.44 | $45.50 | $256.69 | $21.50 | $223.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 23 | 41 | 12 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 13 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $6.57 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
ABBV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IQV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ALMS vs IMVT vs ABBV vs DAWN vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the stronger pick with 20. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) offers the better valuation at 22. 8x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alumis Inc. Common Stock (ALMS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
On trailing P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the cheapest at 22. 8x versus AbbVie Inc. at 85. 0x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) delivered a total return of +99. 6%, compared to -22. 8% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ABBV returned +293. 8% versus DAWN's -8. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus Alumis Inc. Common Stock's 1. 52β — meaning ALMS is approximately 497% more volatile than DAWN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.
(DAWN) is pulling ahead at 20. 6% versus 5. 9% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alumis Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 72. 4% year-over-year, compared to -45. 2% for Immunovant, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 3% net margin versus -1011. 7% for Alumis Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 8. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ABBV leads at 32. 8% versus -1886. 9% for ALMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALMS leads at 96. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for AbbVie Inc. — 0. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALMS: 62. 5% to $38. 44.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV?
In this comparison, ABBV (3.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ALMS, IMVT, DAWN, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALMS or IMVT or ABBV or DAWN or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AbbVie Inc.
(ABBV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 3. 3% yield, +293. 8% 10Y return). Alumis Inc. Common Stock (ALMS) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABBV: +293. 8%, ALMS: +77. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALMS and IMVT and ABBV and DAWN and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALMS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABBV is a large-cap income-oriented stock; DAWN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ABBV pays a dividend while ALMS, IMVT, DAWN, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.