Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$439M
5Y Perf.+1062.4%
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$64.50B
5Y Perf.+1544.4%
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.28B
5Y Perf.+2.8%
POET
POET Technologies Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • CA
Market Cap$1.67B
5Y Perf.+251.7%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.-18.6%

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALMU logoALMU
LITE logoLITE
AMBA logoAMBA
POET logoPOET
OLED logoOLED
IndustrySemiconductorsCommunication EquipmentSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$439M$64.50B$3.28B$1.67B$4.32B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$2.49B$374M$763K$627M
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$440M$-80M$-51M$214M
Gross Margin50.2%37.7%59.8%-17.0%73.5%
Operating Margin-105.0%9.5%-23.6%-51.5%35.6%
Forward P/E110.1x98.0x21.7x
Total Debt$941K$2.61B$5M$7M$43M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$521M$145M$37M$138M

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLEDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALMU
LITE
AMBA
POET
OLED
StockNov 22May 26Return
Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU)1001162.4+1062.4%
Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE)1001644.4+1544.4%
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA)100102.8+2.8%
POET Technologies I… (POET)100351.7+251.7%
Universal Display C… (OLED)10081.4-18.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OLED leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Aeluma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. LITE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.
The Growth Leader

ALMU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.

  • 407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1%
Best for: growth
LITE
Lumentum Holdings Inc.
The Growth Play

LITE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
  • 36.8% 10Y total return vs ALMU's 11.2%
  • +12.8% vs OLED's -34.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
The Growth Angle

AMBA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
POET
POET Technologies Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, POET doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
The Income Pick

OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 2.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Beta 1.33, yield 2.0%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALMU logoALMU407.9% revenue growth vs POET's -91.1%
ValueOLED logoOLEDBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsOLED logoOLED34.1% margin vs POET's -66.3%
Stability / SafetyOLED logoOLEDBeta 1.33 vs POET's 3.15, lower leverage
DividendsOLED logoOLED2.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)LITE logoLITE+12.8% vs OLED's -34.2%
Efficiency (ROA)OLED logoOLED11.0% ROA vs POET's -46.9%

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALMUAeluma, Inc.
FY 2024
Sampling Purchases Member
100.0%$64,756
LITELumentum Holdings Inc.
FY 2023
Lasers Segment
100.0%$209M
AMBAAmbarella, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

POETPOET Technologies Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
FY 2025
Material Sales
54.3%$353M
Royalty And License Fees
42.3%$275M
Contract Research Services
3.5%$23M

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOLEDLAGGINGPOET

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

LITE is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 3262.6x POET's $762,695. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to POET's -66.3%. On growth, POET holds the edge at +80.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$2.5B$374M$762,695$627M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M$425M-$72M-$36M$259M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M$440M-$80M-$51M$214M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$772,780$399M$76M-$35M$237M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.2%+37.7%+59.8%-17.0%+73.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-105.0%+9.5%-23.6%-51.5%+35.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-52.5%+17.7%-21.3%-66.3%+34.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.8%+16.0%+20.3%-46.2%+37.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.1%+90.1%+31.2%+80.0%-14.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.2%+3.3%+39.7%+50.0%-43.7%
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 18.1x trailing earnings, OLED trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2441.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OLED's 14.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 869.4x.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Market CapShares × price$439M$64.5B$3.3B$1.7B$4.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$437M$66.6B$3.1B$1.6B$4.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-106.13x2441.70x-26.87x-11.63x18.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.110.06x98.00x21.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple869.35x14.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue94.20x39.21x11.53x9999.00x6.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.96x55.41x5.61x31.85x2.48x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF140.04x27.99x
OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-76 for POET. AMBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs POET's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.7%+30.7%-13.5%-76.1%+12.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%+8.5%-10.6%-46.9%+11.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.6%-4.3%-22.5%+11.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.5%-4.8%-22.2%-2.3%+14.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967634
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x2.30x0.01x0.35x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M$2.1B-$139M-$30M-$95M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$521M$145M$37M$138M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$941,000$2.6B$5M$7M$43M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.00x9.62x-396.56x
Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALMU five years ago would be worth $122,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,832 for OLED. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1275.9% total return vs OLED's -34.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 166.2% vs OLED's -11.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.1%+134.0%+1.5%+52.7%-24.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+94.2%+1275.9%+44.4%+147.4%-34.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+510.3%+1786.5%+13.8%+147.4%-30.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%+1018.5%-12.4%+42.0%-51.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%+3680.0%+99.4%+12.8%+84.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+82.7%+166.2%+4.4%+35.3%-11.5%
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OLED is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POET's 3.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LITE currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs OLED's 56.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.89x2.66x2.53x3.15x1.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.73$1021.00$96.69$15.50$163.21
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.20$63.98$48.30$3.87$83.64
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.0%+88.5%+78.9%+70.6%+56.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.353.374.755.344.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M6.5M866K27.4M823K
Evenly matched — LITE and OLED each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", AMBA as "Buy", POET as "Buy", OLED as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.7% upside for OLED (target: $141) vs -26.9% for POET (target: $8). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.LITE logoLITELumentum Holdings…AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.POET logoPOETPOET Technologies…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$918.67$98.33$8.00$141.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12536219
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises09
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.1%0.0%0.0%+0.8%
OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OLED leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LITE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallUniversal Display Corporati… (OLED)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALMU vs LITE vs AMBA vs POET vs OLED: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). Universal Display Corporation (OLED) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

On trailing P/E, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the cheapest at 18.

1x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2441. 7x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

Over the past 5 years, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) delivered a total return of +1121%, compared to -51. 7% for Universal Display Corporation (OLED). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 8% versus POET's +12. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

33β versus POET Technologies Inc. 's 3. 15β — meaning POET is approximately 137% more volatile than OLED relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus -91. 1% for POET Technologies Inc. (POET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lumentum Holdings Inc. grew EPS 104. 6% year-over-year, compared to -84. 3% for POET Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OLED leads at 1. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

2% net margin versus -1368. 6% for POET Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -725. 7% for POET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POET leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 21.

7x forward P/E versus 110. 1x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 88. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for OLED: 53. 7% to $141. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED?

In this comparison, OLED (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. ALMU, LITE, AMBA, POET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ALMU or LITE or AMBA or POET or OLED better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

0% yield). POET Technologies Inc. (POET) carries a higher beta of 3. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +84. 8%, POET: +12. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALMU and LITE and AMBA and POET and OLED?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AMBA is a small-cap high-growth stock; POET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED pays a dividend while ALMU, LITE, AMBA, POET do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALMU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LITE

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 45%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMBA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POET

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 3999%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OLED

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ALMU and LITE and AMBA and POET and OLED on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ALMU: -21.1% · LITE: 90.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.