Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication
Staffing & Employment Services
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication | Staffing & Employment Services | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $109M | $14.65B | $1.62B | $790M | $975M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $150M | $3.69B | $546M | $1.33B | $803M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $456M | $26M | $35M | $28M |
| Gross Margin | 34.1% | 68.8% | 44.9% | 27.2% | 26.6% |
| Operating Margin | -7.3% | 17.7% | 5.8% | 3.8% | 5.6% |
| Forward P/E | 22.0x | 20.0x | 37.5x | 18.0x | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $49M | $1.39B | $5M | $70M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $253M | $111M | $2M | $128M |
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT) | 100 | 221.9 | +121.9% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) | 100 | 53.9 | -46.1% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 471.9 | +371.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALOT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 64.1%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.52, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 0.52 vs PRLB's 1.84
TRMB is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 12.4% margin vs ALOT's -11.2%
PRLB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 33.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
- 6.4% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5%
- +76.0% vs TRMB's -6.7%
KFRC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- 195.5% 10Y total return vs DAKT's 156.0%
- Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.5x)
- 3.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, DAKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 37.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs ALOT's -11.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs PRLB's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.0% vs TRMB's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs ALOT's -11.6%, ROIC 19.1% vs -5.7% |
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories
TRMB leads 1 • DAKT leads 1 • ALOT leads 0 • PRLB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 24.5x ALOT's $150M. TRMB is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALOT's -11.2%. On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $150M | $3.7B | $546M | $1.3B | $803M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $785M | $57M | $56M | $65M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $456M | $26M | $35M | $28M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $253M | $65M | $43M | $62M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.1% | +68.8% | +44.9% | +27.2% | +26.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.3% | +17.7% | +5.8% | +3.8% | +5.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.2% | +12.4% | +4.7% | +2.6% | +3.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +6.9% | +12.0% | +3.3% | +7.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.1% | +11.8% | +10.4% | +0.1% | +21.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.7% | +55.6% | +120.0% | +2.2% | +117.0% |
Valuation Metrics
KFRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.1x trailing earnings, KFRC trades at a 71% valuation discount to PRLB's 77.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KFRC's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRLB's 25.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $109M | $14.7B | $1.6B | $790M | $975M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $152M | $15.8B | $1.5B | $858M | $865M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.39x | 35.34x | 77.34x | 22.05x | -95.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.95x | 20.01x | 37.53x | 17.96x | 21.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 14.39x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 20.05x | 25.21x | 15.42x | 16.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.72x | 4.08x | 3.04x | 0.59x | 1.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 2.54x | 2.46x | 6.17x | 3.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.60x | 110.00x | 27.14x | 16.88x | 12.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KFRC delivers a 27.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $-22 for ALOT. PRLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALOT's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRLB scores 6/9 vs ALOT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.1% | +8.0% | +3.8% | +27.2% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.6% | +5.0% | +3.4% | +9.2% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.7% | +6.8% | +3.4% | +19.1% | +13.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.5% | +7.8% | +3.8% | +20.1% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | 0.24x | 0.01x | 0.56x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43M | $1.1B | -$106M | $68M | -$111M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $253M | $111M | $2M | $128M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $49M | $1.4B | $5M | $70M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.21x | 12.26x | — | — | 37.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAKT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DAKT five years ago would be worth $30,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,711 for PRLB. Over the past 12 months, PRLB leads with a +76.0% total return vs TRMB's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 57.8% vs KFRC's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +60.3% | -21.0% | +32.5% | +39.2% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +57.3% | -6.7% | +76.0% | +18.9% | +46.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.1% | +30.1% | +122.6% | -13.8% | +293.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.5% | -22.0% | -32.9% | -16.8% | +208.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2.3% | +166.8% | +13.7% | +195.5% | +156.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.0% | +9.2% | +30.6% | -4.8% | +57.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALOT and PRLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALOT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRLB's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRLB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs TRMB's 70.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.46x | 1.84x | 0.53x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.08 | $87.50 | $70.00 | $47.48 | $28.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.96 | $61.63 | $36.15 | $24.49 | $13.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +70.7% | +97.2% | +91.0% | +70.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 74.2 | 36.8 | 69.4 | 65.6 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 1.7M | 145K | 305K | 449K |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALOT as "Buy", TRMB as "Buy", PRLB as "Hold", KFRC as "Hold", DAKT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs -43.4% for PRLB (target: $39). KFRC is the only dividend payer here at 3.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $95.00 | $38.50 | $71.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 28 | 17 | 10 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +3.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 8 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.55 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.9% | +2.7% | +6.4% | +3.0% |
KFRC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). TRMB leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ALOT vs TRMB vs PRLB vs KFRC vs DAKT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Proto Labs, Inc.
(PRLB) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Kforce Inc. (KFRC) offers the better valuation at 22. 1x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AstroNova, Inc. (ALOT) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
On trailing P/E, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the cheapest at 22. 1x versus Proto Labs, Inc. at 77. 3x. On forward P/E, Kforce Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
Over the past 5 years, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) delivered a total return of +208. 3%, compared to -32. 9% for Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFRC returned +195. 5% versus ALOT's +2. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AstroNova, Inc.
(ALOT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Proto Labs, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning PRLB is approximately 253% more volatile than ALOT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 64% for AstroNova, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Proto Labs, Inc.
(PRLB) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Proto Labs, Inc. grew EPS 33. 3% year-over-year, compared to -406. 3% for AstroNova, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALOT leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
Trimble Inc.
(TRMB) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus -9. 6% for AstroNova, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRMB leads at 16. 9% versus -5. 7% for ALOT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) trades at 18. 0x forward P/E versus 37. 5x for Proto Labs, Inc. — 19. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ALOT, TRMB, PRLB, DAKT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALOT or TRMB or PRLB or KFRC or DAKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 53), 3. 6% yield, +195. 5% 10Y return). Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFRC: +195. 5%, PRLB: +13. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALOT and TRMB and PRLB and KFRC and DAKT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALOT (Technology) and TRMB (Technology) and PRLB (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and DAKT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALOT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PRLB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC pays a dividend while ALOT, TRMB, PRLB, DAKT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.