Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
DAKT vs LYTS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
DAKT vs LYTS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $978M | $757M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $803M | $592M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $28M | $26M |
| Gross Margin | 26.6% | 25.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | 21.6x | 22.2x |
| Total Debt | $17M | $67M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $128M | $3M |
DAKT vs LYTS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) | 100 | 473.3 | +373.3% |
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 395.8 | +295.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAKT vs LYTS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAKT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.3% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 106.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.48, Low D/E 6.2%, current ratio 2.22x
- Lower P/E (21.6x vs 22.2x)
LYTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.43, yield 0.8%
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -4.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.0%
- Beta 1.43, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs DAKT's -7.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.6x vs 22.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs DAKT's 3.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.43 vs DAKT's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.3% vs DAKT's +47.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.5% ROA vs DAKT's 5.1%, ROIC 9.5% vs 13.2% |
DAKT vs LYTS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAKT vs LYTS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAKT and LYTS operate at a comparable scale, with $803M and $592M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.3% (LYTS) to 3.4% (DAKT). On growth, DAKT holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $803M | $592M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $65M | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $28M | $26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +25.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +117.0% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DAKT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DAKT's 16.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYTS's 17.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $978M | $757M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $868M | $820M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -95.57x | 30.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.58x | 22.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.48x | 16.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.29x | 1.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.51x | 3.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.51x | 21.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAKT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LYTS delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $10 for DAKT. DAKT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYTS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LYTS scores 5/9 vs DAKT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | +6.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.2% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$111M | $63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $128M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $17M | $67M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 37.31x | 13.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DAKT and LYTS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,645 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $31,116 for DAKT. Over the past 12 months, LYTS leads with a +58.3% total return vs DAKT's +47.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAKT at 58.0% vs LYTS's 25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.2% | +32.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.7% | +58.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +294.3% | +99.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +211.2% | +226.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.3% | +106.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.0% | +25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LYTS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYTS is the less volatile stock with a 1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DAKT's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs DAKT's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.27 | $24.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.05 | $15.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.0% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.6 | 68.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 454K | 374K |
Analyst Outlook
LYTS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates DAKT as "Buy" and LYTS as "Buy". LYTS is the only dividend payer here at 0.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.19 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | 0.0% |
DAKT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LYTS leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
DAKT vs LYTS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAKT or LYTS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) offers the better valuation at 30. 8x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAKT or LYTS?
On forward P/E, Daktronics, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 21. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAKT or LYTS?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +226. 5%, compared to +211. 2% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DAKT returned +157. 3% versus LYTS's +106. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAKT or LYTS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 43β versus Daktronics, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning DAKT is approximately 4% more volatile than LYTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 29% for LSI Industries Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAKT or LYTS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -7. 5% for Daktronics, Inc. (DAKT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LSI Industries Inc. grew EPS -4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -128. 4% for Daktronics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAKT or LYTS?
LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 3% net margin versus -1. 3% for Daktronics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 4. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LYTS leads at 6. 2% versus 4. 4% for DAKT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DAKT leads at 25. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAKT or LYTS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Daktronics, Inc.
(DAKT) trades at 21. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 2x for LSI Industries Inc. — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAKT or LYTS?
In this comparison, LYTS (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DAKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DAKT or LYTS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 8% yield, +106. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYTS: +106. 6%, DAKT: +157. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAKT and LYTS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DAKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock. LYTS pays a dividend while DAKT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.