Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALSN vs APTV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
ALSN vs APTV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | $10.23B | $12.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.65B | $20.66B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $365M |
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | 19.1% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.92B | $8.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.50B | $1.85B |
ALSN vs APTV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 326.3 | +226.3% |
| Aptiv PLC (APTV) | 100 | 75.7 | -24.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALSN vs APTV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALSN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 0.9%
- 373.8% 10Y total return vs APTV's 9.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 4.85x
APTV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.5%, EPS growth -89.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 3.5% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7%
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 13.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.5% revenue growth vs ALSN's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs APTV's 1.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs APTV's 1.44 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +27.7% vs APTV's -3.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.4% ROA vs APTV's 1.7%, ROIC 22.2% vs 5.5% |
ALSN vs APTV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALSN vs APTV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
APTV is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.7B annually — 5.7x ALSN's $3.6B. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to APTV's 1.8%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $20.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $970M | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $365M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $713M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +19.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +1.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.6% | +5.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.4% | +19.4% |
Valuation Metrics
APTV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 78% valuation discount to APTV's 76.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, APTV's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALSN's 10.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $12.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $18.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.79x | 76.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.60x | 8.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.63x | 8.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 0.59x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.60x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.77x | 7.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $4 for APTV. APTV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.85x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALSN's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), APTV scores 8/9 vs ALSN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.5% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +6.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.85x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $6.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $1.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.20x | 6.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $28,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,836 for APTV. Over the past 12 months, ALSN leads with a +27.7% total return vs APTV's -3.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 37.9% vs APTV's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.7% | -27.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | -3.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.2% | -39.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.5% | -61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.8% | +9.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.9% | -15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
ALSN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALSN is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than APTV's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALSN currently trades 89.6% from its 52-week high vs APTV's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.44x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.42 | $88.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.01 | $52.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +64.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 37.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 814K | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
ALSN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALSN as "Hold" and APTV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 66.0% upside for APTV (target: $95) vs -5.8% for ALSN (target: $116). ALSN is the only dividend payer here at 0.87% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.00 | $94.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | +3.3% |
ALSN leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). APTV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ALSN vs APTV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALSN or APTV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aptiv PLC (APTV) is the stronger pick with 3.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aptiv PLC (APTV) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALSN or APTV?
On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Aptiv PLC at 76. 1x. On forward P/E, Aptiv PLC is actually cheaper at 8. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALSN or APTV?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +183. 5%, compared to -61. 6% for Aptiv PLC (APTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALSN returned +373. 8% versus APTV's +9. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALSN or APTV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Aptiv PLC's 1. 44β — meaning APTV is approximately 30% more volatile than ALSN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Aptiv PLC (APTV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 85% versus 156% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALSN or APTV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aptiv PLC (APTV) is pulling ahead at 3.
5% versus -6. 7% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -11. 8% year-over-year, compared to -89. 2% for Aptiv PLC. Over a 3-year CAGR, APTV leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALSN or APTV?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 0. 8% for Aptiv PLC — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 5. 8% for APTV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALSN or APTV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Aptiv PLC (APTV) trades at 8.
7x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APTV: 66. 0% to $94. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALSN or APTV?
In this comparison, ALSN (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. APTV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALSN or APTV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +373. 8%, APTV: +9. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALSN and APTV?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; APTV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALSN pays a dividend while APTV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.