Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALT vs GPCR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
ALT vs GPCR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $343M | $2.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $-170M |
| Gross Margin | -364.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -2304.6% | — |
| Total Debt | $34M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $44M | $800M |
ALT vs GPCR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Altimmune, Inc. (ALT) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Structure Therapeut… (GPCR) | 100 | 153.0 | +53.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALT vs GPCR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 105.0%, EPS growth 25.4%
- 12.1% 10Y total return vs GPCR's 50.4%
- 105.0% revenue growth vs GPCR's -18.6%
GPCR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.89
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 24.81x
- Beta 0.89, current ratio 24.81x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 105.0% revenue growth vs GPCR's -18.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.3% margin vs ALT's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs ALT's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.8% vs ALT's -46.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -14.4% ROA vs ALT's -41.7%, ROIC -30.3% vs -46.7% |
ALT vs GPCR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALT vs GPCR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALT and GPCR operate at a comparable scale, with $41,000 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$94M | -$209M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | -$170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$68M | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -364.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2304.6% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2148.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1654.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.2% | -29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALT and GPCR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $343M | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $333M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.09x | -16.29x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8356.77x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GPCR leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPCR delivers a -15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-15 in annual profit, vs $-49 for ALT. GPCR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALT's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALT scores 4/9 vs GPCR's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -49.4% | -15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | -14.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -46.7% | -30.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -48.0% | -24.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | -$793M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $44M | $800M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -54.74x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GPCR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPCR five years ago would be worth $15,038 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,362 for ALT. Over the past 12 months, GPCR leads with a +45.8% total return vs ALT's -46.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GPCR at 17.7% vs ALT's -14.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.0% | -42.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -46.7% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | +62.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.4% | +50.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1213.1% | +50.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | +17.7% |
Risk & Volatility
GPCR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPCR is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALT's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.39x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.73 | $94.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.56 | $15.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.0% | +41.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.4 | 27.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.1M | 951K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALT as "Buy" and GPCR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 264.1% upside for ALT (target: $11) vs 193.5% for GPCR (target: $115).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.25 | $114.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% |
GPCR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ALT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
ALT vs GPCR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALT or GPCR a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALT or GPCR?
Over the past 5 years, Structure Therapeutics Inc.
(GPCR) delivered a total return of +50. 4%, compared to -76. 4% for Altimmune, Inc. (ALT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALT returned +1213% versus GPCR's +50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALT or GPCR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Structure Therapeutics Inc.
(GPCR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 89β versus Altimmune, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning ALT is approximately 56% more volatile than GPCR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Structure Therapeutics Inc. (GPCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 15% for Altimmune, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ALT or GPCR?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Altimmune, Inc.
grew EPS 25. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 6% for Structure Therapeutics Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALT or GPCR?
Structure Therapeutics Inc.
(GPCR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -2148. 6% for Altimmune, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPCR leads at 0. 0% versus -2304. 6% for ALT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPCR leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ALT or GPCR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is ALT or GPCR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Altimmune, Inc.
(ALT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1213% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALT: +1213%, GPCR: +50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ALT and GPCR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALT is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.