Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Construction
Construction
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Construction | Construction |
| Market Cap | $265M | $59.14B | $790M | $4.12B | $8.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.82B | $16.36B | $1.33B | $1.18B | $14.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-79M | $2.51B | $35M | $191M | $292M |
| Gross Margin | 25.7% | 36.3% | 27.2% | 39.2% | 29.9% |
| Operating Margin | 0.9% | 24.7% | 3.8% | 22.1% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 20.1x | 18.0x | 24.0x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.17B | $16.48B | $70M | $229M | $5.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $459M | $2M | $4M | $182M |
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alta Equipment Grou… (ALTG) | 100 | 121.7 | +21.7% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 679.7 | +579.7% |
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 143.1 | +43.1% |
| Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) | 100 | 65.2 | -34.8% |
| Builders FirstSourc… (BLDR) | 100 | 381.9 | +281.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALTG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +80.5% vs TREX's -30.8%
URI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth -0.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
- 14.8% 10Y total return vs BLDR's 6.1%
- PEG 0.78 vs TREX's 7.16
- 4.9% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 3.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53, yield 3.6%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.53 vs ALTG's 2.30
TREX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and efficiency.
- 16.3% margin vs ALTG's -4.3%
- 12.3% ROA vs ALTG's -5.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs 1.4%
Among these 5 stocks, BLDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs BLDR's -7.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 24.0x), PEG 0.78 vs 7.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.3% margin vs ALTG's -4.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs ALTG's 2.30 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs ALTG's 1.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.5% vs TREX's -30.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.3% ROA vs ALTG's -5.7%, ROIC 16.4% vs 1.4% |
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TREX leads in 1 of 6 categories
URI leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • ALTG leads 0 • BLDR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — URI and TREX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 13.9x TREX's $1.2B. TREX is the more profitable business, keeping 16.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALTG's -4.3%. On growth, URI holds the edge at +7.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $16.4B | $1.3B | $1.2B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $90M | $6.5B | $56M | $309M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$79M | $2.5B | $35M | $191M | $292M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $63M | $1.5B | $43M | $263M | $862M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +36.3% | +27.2% | +39.2% | +29.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.9% | +24.7% | +3.8% | +22.1% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.3% | +15.3% | +2.6% | +16.3% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +9.1% | +3.3% | +22.3% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.0% | +7.2% | +0.1% | +1.0% | -10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +5.6% | +2.2% | +3.6% | -151.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALTG and BLDR each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.4x trailing earnings, BLDR trades at a 16% valuation discount to URI's 24.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URI offers better value at 0.94x vs TREX's 6.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $265M | $59.1B | $790M | $4.1B | $8.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.4B | $75.2B | $858M | $4.3B | $14.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.20x | 24.45x | 22.05x | 22.00x | 20.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.14x | 17.96x | 23.95x | 14.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.94x | — | 6.58x | 2.59x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 27.27x | 10.61x | 15.42x | 13.53x | 10.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 3.67x | 0.59x | 3.51x | 0.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 6.80x | 6.17x | 4.05x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.09x | 89.34x | 16.88x | 30.60x | 10.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TREX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
URI delivers a 27.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-33 for ALTG. TREX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to URI's 1.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TREX scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -32.5% | +27.9% | +27.2% | +18.8% | +6.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.7% | +8.4% | +9.2% | +12.3% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.4% | +12.4% | +19.1% | +16.4% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.7% | +15.6% | +20.1% | +23.2% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.84x | 0.56x | 0.22x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | $16.0B | $68M | $225M | $5.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $459M | $2M | $4M | $182M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $16.5B | $70M | $229M | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.38x | 5.72x | — | — | 2.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URI five years ago would be worth $27,803 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,599 for TREX. Over the past 12 months, ALTG leads with a +80.5% total return vs TREX's -30.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URI at 41.4% vs ALTG's -13.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.8% | +12.0% | +39.2% | +9.3% | -24.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +80.5% | +46.0% | +18.9% | -30.8% | -25.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.8% | +182.8% | -13.8% | -30.4% | -30.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.1% | +178.0% | -16.8% | -64.0% | +51.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.9% | +1482.5% | +195.5% | +239.9% | +614.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.8% | +41.4% | -4.8% | -11.4% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — URI and KFRC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALTG's 2.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URI currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs BLDR's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 1.19x | 0.53x | 1.47x | 1.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.99 | $1021.47 | $47.48 | $68.78 | $151.03 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.16 | $647.05 | $24.49 | $29.77 | $73.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.7% | +92.4% | +91.0% | +56.9% | +52.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 69.4 | 65.6 | 51.3 | 42.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 212K | 557K | 305K | 1.7M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALTG as "Buy", URI as "Buy", KFRC as "Hold", TREX as "Hold", BLDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 1.2% for ALTG (target: $8). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs URI's 0.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $1037.13 | $71.00 | $44.50 | $109.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 40 | 10 | 31 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +0.8% | +3.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | $7.18 | $1.55 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.8% | +3.3% | +6.4% | +1.3% | +4.7% |
TREX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). URI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ALTG vs URI vs KFRC vs TREX vs BLDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) offers the better valuation at 20. 4x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
On trailing P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc.
(BLDR) is the cheapest at 20. 4x versus United Rentals, Inc. at 24. 5x. On forward P/E, Builders FirstSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
Over the past 5 years, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) delivered a total return of +178. 0%, compared to -64. 0% for Trex Company, Inc. (TREX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: URI returned +1483% versus ALTG's -8. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus Alta Equipment Group Inc. 's 2. 30β — meaning ALTG is approximately 335% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Trex Company, Inc. (TREX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 184% for United Rentals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus -7. 4% for Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Rentals, Inc. grew EPS -0. 2% year-over-year, compared to -57. 1% for Builders FirstSource, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, URI leads at 11. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
Trex Company, Inc.
(TREX) is the more profitable company, earning 16. 2% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alta Equipment Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URI leads at 24. 7% versus 1. 3% for ALTG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREX leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus Trex Company, Inc. 's 7. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 0x for Trex Company, Inc. — 9. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 64. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
6% yield), ALTG (1. 1% yield), URI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TREX, BLDR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALTG or URI or KFRC or TREX or BLDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 19), 0. 8% yield, +1483% 10Y return). Alta Equipment Group Inc. (ALTG) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1483%, ALTG: -8. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALTG and URI and KFRC and TREX and BLDR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALTG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLDR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ALTG, URI, KFRC pay a dividend while TREX, BLDR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.