AM vs CTRA vs EQT vs AR

For growth investors, EQT Corporation (EQT) is the stronger pick with 73.

7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Coterra Energy Inc.

(CTRA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Antero Midstream Corporation at 24. 7x. On forward P/E, Antero Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) delivered a total return of +236.

4%, compared to +125. 2% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRA returned +68. 7% versus AM's -13. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.

(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Antero Resources Corporation's 0. 24β — meaning AR is approximately 711% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 163% for Antero Midstream Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EQT Corporation (EQT) is pulling ahead at 73.

7% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Antero Resources Corporation grew EPS 1028% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Antero Midstream Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AM leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Coterra Energy Inc.

(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 12. 7% for Antero Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 16. 5% for AR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AM leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Antero Resources Corporation (AR) trades at 8.

3x forward P/E versus 19. 2x for Antero Midstream Corporation — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AR: 34. 4% to $48. 89.

In this comparison, AM (4.

3% yield), CTRA (2. 8% yield), EQT (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.

(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +68. 7%, AR: +44. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; EQT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. AM, CTRA, EQT pay a dividend while AR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.