Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AM vs WMB

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$10.05B
5Y Perf.+342.7%
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$90.21B
5Y Perf.+261.0%

AM vs WMB — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AM logoAM
WMB logoWMB
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$10.05B$90.21B
Revenue (TTM)$1.29B$11.92B
Net Income (TTM)$411M$2.84B
Gross Margin64.5%62.8%
Operating Margin57.6%38.8%
Forward P/E19.1x31.6x
Total Debt$3.22B$29.36B
Cash & Equiv.$180M$63M

AM vs WMBLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AM
WMB
StockMay 20May 26Return
Antero Midstream Co… (AM)100442.7+342.7%
The Williams Compan… (WMB)100361.0+261.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AM vs WMB

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. The Williams Companies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
The Defensive Pick

AM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 3.41x
  • Beta 0.19, yield 4.3%, current ratio 3.41x
  • Lower P/E (19.1x vs 31.6x)
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
WMB
The Williams Companies, Inc.
The Income Pick

WMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.17, yield 2.7%
  • Rev growth 13.8%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.9%
  • 357.0% 10Y total return vs AM's -14.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthWMB logoWMB13.8% revenue growth vs AM's 7.0%
ValueAM logoAMLower P/E (19.1x vs 31.6x)
Quality / MarginsAM logoAM31.9% margin vs WMB's 23.8%
Stability / SafetyWMB logoWMBBeta 0.17 vs AM's 0.19
DividendsAM logoAM4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs WMB's 2.7%
Momentum (1Y)WMB logoWMB+29.1% vs AM's +26.0%
Efficiency (ROA)AM logoAM6.9% ROA vs WMB's 4.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 7.7%

AM vs WMB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMAntero Midstream Corporation
FY 2025
Natural Gas Gathering Transportation Marketing And Processing Affiliate
78.4%$987M
Natural Gas Water Handling And Treatment Affiliate
21.4%$269M
Natural Gas Water Handling And Treatment
0.2%$2M
WMBThe Williams Companies, Inc.
FY 2025
Gas & NGL Marketing Services
71.6%$7.2B
West
28.4%$2.8B

AM vs WMB — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMLAGGINGWMB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

WMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.9B annually — 9.3x AM's $1.3B. AM is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMB's 23.8%. On growth, AM holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$1.3B$11.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$951M$6.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$411M$2.8B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$916M$722M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.5%+62.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+57.6%+38.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+31.9%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+71.2%+6.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.6%-0.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year0.0%+24.6%
AM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 24.6x trailing earnings, AM trades at a 29% valuation discount to WMB's 34.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AM's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WMB's 17.7x.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Market CapShares × price$10.1B$90.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.1B$119.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.60x34.47x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.14x31.58x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.52x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.41x17.71x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.98x7.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share5.17x6.01x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.05x89.76x
AM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

AM delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $19 for WMB. AM carries lower financial leverage with a 1.63x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMB's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AM scores 8/9 vs WMB's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+20.4%+19.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.9%+4.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.4%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.2%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.63x1.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.0B$29.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$180M$63M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.2B$29.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.07x3.37x
AM leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

WMB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WMB five years ago would be worth $33,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $28,105 for AM. Over the past 12 months, WMB leads with a +29.1% total return vs AM's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMB at 39.1% vs AM's 32.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.5%+22.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+26.0%+29.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+130.5%+169.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+181.1%+232.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.0%+357.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+32.1%+39.1%
WMB leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

WMB is the less volatile stock with a 0.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AM's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs AM's 88.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.19x0.17x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$23.84$77.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$16.77$55.82
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.8%+95.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.366.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.6M5.8M
WMB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AM and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates AM as "Hold" and WMB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.1% upside for WMB (target: $79) vs 1.6% for AM (target: $22). For income investors, AM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs WMB's 2.71%.

MetricAM logoAMAntero Midstream …WMB logoWMBThe Williams Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$21.50$79.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1734
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.3%+2.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises18
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.91$2.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.3%0.0%
Evenly matched — AM and WMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WMB leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallAntero Midstream Corporation (AM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AM vs WMB: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AM or WMB a better buy right now?

For growth investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger pick with 13. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 0% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) offers the better valuation at 24. 6x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AM or WMB?

On trailing P/E, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the cheapest at 24.

6x versus The Williams Companies, Inc. at 34. 5x. On forward P/E, Antero Midstream Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 1x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AM or WMB?

Over the past 5 years, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) delivered a total return of +232. 0%, compared to +181. 1% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMB returned +357. 0% versus AM's -14. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AM or WMB?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 17β versus Antero Midstream Corporation's 0. 19β — meaning AM is approximately 9% more volatile than WMB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 163% versus 196% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AM or WMB?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is pulling ahead at 13. 8% versus 7. 0% for Antero Midstream Corporation (AM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Williams Companies, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Antero Midstream Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AM leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AM or WMB?

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the more profitable company, earning 32.

8% net margin versus 21. 9% for The Williams Companies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AM leads at 51. 2% versus 36. 8% for WMB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AM leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AM or WMB more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) trades at 19.

1x forward P/E versus 31. 6x for The Williams Companies, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WMB: 7. 1% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AM or WMB?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 2. 7% for The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB).

09

Is AM or WMB better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Williams Companies, Inc.

(WMB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 17), 2. 7% yield, +357. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMB: +357. 0%, AM: -14. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AM and WMB?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

AM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.0%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AM and WMB on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AM: 8.6% · WMB: -0.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(AM: 31.9% · WMB: 23.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(AM: 24.6x · WMB: 34.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.