Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.42B
5Y Perf.+11.5%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$27.21B
5Y Perf.+1042.6%
COHU
Cohu, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.32B
5Y Perf.+227.5%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.97B
5Y Perf.-44.1%
ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$204.87B
5Y Perf.+271.5%

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBQ logoAMBQ
MTSI logoMTSI
COHU logoCOHU
SWKS logoSWKS
ADI logoADI
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$1.42B$27.21B$2.32B$9.97B$204.87B
Revenue (TTM)$82M$1.07B$481M$4.04B$11.76B
Net Income (TTM)$-38M$177M$-56M$361M$2.71B
Gross Margin34.5%55.3%25.7%41.1%62.8%
Operating Margin-53.9%16.0%-10.6%9.4%29.2%
Forward P/E73.8x84.6x13.3x36.7x
Total Debt$678K$538M$359M$1.20B$8.66B
Cash & Equiv.$140M$112M$227M$1.16B$2.50B

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBQ
MTSI
COHU
SWKS
ADI
StockMay 20May 26Return
MACOM Technology So… (MTSI)1001142.6+1042.6%
Cohu, Inc. (COHU)100327.5+227.5%
Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS)10055.9-44.1%
Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI)100371.5+271.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MTSI and SWKS are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. ADI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro, Inc.
The Technology Pick

AMBQ lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MTSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 8.7% 10Y total return vs ADI's 7.1%
  • 32.6% revenue growth vs AMBQ's -4.7%
  • +195.9% vs SWKS's -5.3%
  • 8.6% ROA vs AMBQ's -21.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs -127.0%
Best for: long-term compounding
COHU
Cohu, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, COHU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWKS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
  • Beta 1.30, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.33x
  • Lower P/E (13.3x vs 36.7x)
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ADI
Analog Devices, Inc.
The Growth Play

ADI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 16.9%, EPS growth 39.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.8%
  • 23.0% margin vs AMBQ's -46.9%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMTSI logoMTSI32.6% revenue growth vs AMBQ's -4.7%
ValueSWKS logoSWKSLower P/E (13.3x vs 36.7x)
Quality / MarginsADI logoADI23.0% margin vs AMBQ's -46.9%
Stability / SafetySWKS logoSWKSBeta 1.30 vs AMBQ's 2.92
DividendsSWKS logoSWKS4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs ADI's 0.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MTSI logoMTSI+195.9% vs SWKS's -5.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MTSI logoMTSI8.6% ROA vs AMBQ's -21.3%, ROIC 6.0% vs -127.0%

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

COHUCohu, Inc.
FY 2014
Semiconductor Equipment
95.0%$317M
Microwave Communications Equipment
5.0%$17M
SWKSSkyworks Solutions, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ADIAnalog Devices, Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial
45.8%$4.3B
Automotive
30.0%$2.8B
Consumer
12.8%$1.2B
Communications
11.5%$1.1B

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMTSILAGGINGCOHU

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ADI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ADI is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.8B annually — 143.7x AMBQ's $82M. ADI is the more profitable business, keeping 23.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBQ's -46.9%. On growth, AMBQ holds the edge at +59.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$82M$1.1B$481M$4.0B$11.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$39M$223M-$11M$842M$5.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$38M$177M-$56M$361M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$38M$168M$32M$697M$4.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+34.5%+55.3%+25.7%+41.1%+62.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-53.9%+16.0%-10.6%+9.4%+29.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-46.9%+16.5%-11.5%+8.9%+23.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-46.6%+15.6%+6.6%+17.2%+38.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+59.3%+22.5%+29.3%-1.0%+30.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+100.0%+42.9%+60.6%-44.2%+116.7%
ADI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.5x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 77% valuation discount to ADI's 92.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 143.2x.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
Market CapShares × price$1.4B$27.2B$2.3B$10.0B$204.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.3B$27.6B$2.4B$10.0B$211.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-14.52x-496.93x-31.02x21.53x92.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.73.84x84.61x13.29x36.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate13.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple143.24x10.40x42.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue19.55x28.13x5.12x2.44x18.59x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.26x20.22x2.93x1.79x6.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF141.13x215.89x9.02x47.88x
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

MTSI delivers a 13.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-24 for AMBQ. AMBQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COHU's 0.46x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADI scores 8/9 vs COHU's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-24.0%+13.2%-6.8%+6.3%+8.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-21.3%+8.6%-4.9%+4.6%+5.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-127.0%+6.0%-5.7%+6.3%+5.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-31.9%+7.6%-5.9%+7.0%+6.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965458
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.41x0.46x0.21x0.26x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$140M$426M$132M$42M$6.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$140M$112M$227M$1.2B$2.5B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$678,000$538M$359M$1.2B$8.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense32.37x-168.82x14.46x10.80x
MTSI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in MTSI five years ago would be worth $72,639 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,902 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, MTSI leads with a +195.9% total return vs SWKS's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTSI at 86.8% vs SWKS's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+118.7%+107.3%+100.4%+4.1%+53.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.3%+195.9%+179.9%-5.3%+89.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.3%+552.1%+42.9%-23.2%+138.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.3%+626.4%+46.9%-51.0%+199.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+72.3%+872.5%+344.6%+40.1%+714.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.9%+86.8%+12.6%-8.4%+33.6%
MTSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMBQ and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBQ's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMBQ currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.92x1.69x2.12x1.30x1.45x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$66.55$368.18$52.43$90.90$422.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$22.12$118.16$16.46$51.92$206.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.7%+98.5%+94.1%+72.9%+99.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10075.082.472.964.272.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded446K1.1M971K3.4M3.4M
Evenly matched — AMBQ and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SWKS and ADI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMBQ as "Hold", MTSI as "Buy", COHU as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy", ADI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -38.7% for AMBQ (target: $41). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs ADI's 0.92%.

MetricAMBQ logoAMBQAmbiq Micro, Inc.MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …COHU logoCOHUCohu, Inc.SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…ADI logoADIAnalog Devices, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$40.67$332.00$49.75$72.30$378.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts123146054
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+4.2%+0.9%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises001222
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.79$3.87
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.2%+0.3%+0.4%+1.1%
Evenly matched — SWKS and ADI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MTSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). ADI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallMACOM Technology Solutions … (MTSI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBQ vs MTSI vs COHU vs SWKS vs ADI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 5x versus Analog Devices, Inc. at 92. 0x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

Over the past 5 years, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) delivered a total return of +626. 4%, compared to -51. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTSI returned +872. 5% versus SWKS's +40. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Ambiq Micro, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning AMBQ is approximately 124% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 46% for Cohu, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus -4. 7% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Analog Devices, Inc. grew EPS 39. 0% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTSI leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

Analog Devices, Inc.

(ADI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 6% net margin versus -50. 3% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ADI leads at 26. 6% versus -56. 7% for AMBQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADI leads at 61. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 84. 6x for Cohu, Inc. — 71. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 9. 0% to $72. 30.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI?

In this comparison, SWKS (4.

2% yield), ADI (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AMBQ, MTSI, COHU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMBQ or MTSI or COHU or SWKS or ADI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Analog Devices, Inc.

(ADI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 9% yield, +714. 7% 10Y return). Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ADI: +714. 7%, AMBQ: +72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMBQ and MTSI and COHU and SWKS and ADI?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMBQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; COHU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ADI is a large-cap high-growth stock. SWKS, ADI pay a dividend while AMBQ, MTSI, COHU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMBQ

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

COHU

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ADI

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBQ and MTSI and COHU and SWKS and ADI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBQ: 59.3% · MTSI: 22.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.