Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.42B | $4.66B | $52.87B | $9.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $82M | $1.17B | $4.37B | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-48M | $-97M | $361M |
| Gross Margin | 34.5% | 43.6% | 55.4% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -53.9% | -6.4% | 4.1% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.8x | 62.3x | 13.3x |
| Total Debt | $678K | $880M | $5.67B | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $140M | $392M | $772M | $1.16B |
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synaptics Incorpora… (SYNA) | 100 | 187.7 | +87.7% |
| Microchip Technolog… (MCHP) | 100 | 203.5 | +103.5% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 55.9 | -44.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMBQ plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
SYNA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 12.0% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3%
- +84.0% vs SWKS's -5.3%
MCHP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 359.8% 10Y total return vs AMBQ's 72.3%
SWKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.2%
- Rev growth -2.2%, EPS growth -16.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.30, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.33x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs MCHP's -42.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 62.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs AMBQ's -46.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs AMBQ's 2.92 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MCHP's 1.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +84.0% vs SWKS's -5.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs AMBQ's -21.3%, ROIC 6.3% vs -127.0% |
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
MCHP leads 1 • AMBQ leads 1 • SYNA leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MCHP is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.4B annually — 53.4x AMBQ's $82M. SWKS is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBQ's -46.9%. On growth, AMBQ holds the edge at +59.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $82M | $1.2B | $4.4B | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | $50M | $881M | $842M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$48M | -$97M | $361M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$38M | $97M | $820M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.5% | +43.6% | +55.4% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -53.9% | -6.4% | +4.1% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -46.9% | -4.1% | -2.2% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -46.6% | +8.3% | +18.8% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +59.3% | +10.4% | +15.6% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +62.5% | +164.2% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SYNA's 105.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $4.7B | $52.9B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $5.2B | $57.8B | $10.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.52x | -98.02x | -9999.00x | 21.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.77x | 62.31x | 13.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 105.13x | 55.20x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.55x | 4.34x | 12.01x | 2.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.26x | 3.37x | 7.42x | 1.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.91x | 68.47x | 9.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKS delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-24 for AMBQ. AMBQ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MCHP's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMBQ scores 6/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -24.0% | -3.5% | -1.4% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.3% | -1.9% | -0.7% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -127.0% | -4.0% | +1.8% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.9% | -3.9% | +2.1% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.63x | 0.80x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$140M | $489M | $4.9B | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $140M | $392M | $772M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $678,000 | $880M | $5.7B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -36.35x | 0.78x | 14.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMBQ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMBQ five years ago would be worth $17,226 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,902 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, SYNA leads with a +84.0% total return vs SWKS's -5.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMBQ at 19.9% vs SWKS's -8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +118.7% | +57.9% | +50.9% | +4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.3% | +84.0% | +63.3% | -5.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.3% | +62.6% | +39.6% | -23.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.3% | +2.1% | +51.2% | -51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +72.3% | +83.7% | +359.8% | +40.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.9% | +17.6% | +11.8% | -8.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMBQ and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMBQ's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMBQ currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 72.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.92x | 2.34x | 1.69x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.55 | $129.78 | $105.91 | $90.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.12 | $57.54 | $48.52 | $51.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.7% | +92.1% | +92.2% | +72.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.0 | 83.2 | 72.6 | 64.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 446K | 783K | 9.4M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
SWKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMBQ as "Hold", SYNA as "Buy", MCHP as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.0% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -38.7% for AMBQ (target: $41). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs MCHP's 1.86%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.67 | $114.50 | $106.35 | $72.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 33 | 46 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.9% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.82 | $2.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.8% | +0.2% | +0.4% |
SWKS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). MCHP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AMBQ vs SYNA vs MCHP vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) is the stronger pick with 12.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 5x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
Over the past 5 years, Ambiq Micro, Inc.
(AMBQ) delivered a total return of +72. 3%, compared to -51. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MCHP returned +359. 8% versus SWKS's +40. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Ambiq Micro, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning AMBQ is approximately 124% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 80% for Microchip Technology Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Synaptics Incorporated (SYNA) is pulling ahead at 12.
0% versus -42. 3% for Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skyworks Solutions, Inc. grew EPS -16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -138. 6% for Synaptics Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMBQ leads at -7. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -50. 3% for Ambiq Micro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKS leads at 12. 2% versus -56. 7% for AMBQ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCHP leads at 56. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 3x for Microchip Technology Incorporated — 49. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 9. 0% to $72. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
2% yield), MCHP (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AMBQ, SYNA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMBQ or SYNA or MCHP or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). Ambiq Micro, Inc. (AMBQ) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +40. 1%, AMBQ: +72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMBQ and SYNA and MCHP and SWKS?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMBQ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SYNA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCHP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MCHP, SWKS pay a dividend while AMBQ, SYNA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.