Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMBR vs GLXY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
AMBR vs GLXY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8M | $121.12B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $100M | $61.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $40M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | 1.9% |
| Operating Margin | -31.4% | 0.9% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $5.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $1.45B |
AMBR vs GLXY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amber International… (AMBR) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
| Galaxy Digital (GLXY) | 100 | 171.5 | +71.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMBR vs GLXY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMBR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.99
- Lower volatility, beta 1.99, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 1.45x
- Beta 1.99, current ratio 1.45x
GLXY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 40.2%, EPS growth -184.1%
- 36.5% 10Y total return vs AMBR's -72.3%
- 40.2% NII/revenue growth vs AMBR's -75.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.2% NII/revenue growth vs AMBR's -75.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.4% margin vs AMBR's -3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.99 vs GLXY's 3.71, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.5% vs AMBR's -78.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.4% ROA vs AMBR's -2.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs -88.1% |
AMBR vs GLXY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMBR vs GLXY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMBR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLXY is the larger business by revenue, generating $61.4B annually — 612.0x AMBR's $100M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -0.4% (GLXY) to -3.8% (AMBR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $100M | $61.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $609M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $40M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $55M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | +1.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -31.4% | +0.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +58.7% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.0% | -4.7% |
Valuation Metrics
AMBR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $121.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$9M | $125.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.15x | -58.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.40x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 205.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.24x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.31x | 39.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXY leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLXY delivers a 1.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-7 for AMBR. AMBR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GLXY's 1.76x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMBR scores 4/9 vs GLXY's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.3% | +1.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -88.1% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -58.1% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 1.76x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17M | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $5.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -46.11x | 9.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLXY leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLXY five years ago would be worth $13,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,766 for AMBR. Over the past 12 months, GLXY leads with a +36.5% total return vs AMBR's -78.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLXY at 10.9% vs AMBR's -34.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.5% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -78.4% | +36.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +36.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +36.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -72.3% | +36.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.8% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMBR and GLXY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMBR is the less volatile stock with a 1.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GLXY's 3.71 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLXY currently trades 67.8% from its 52-week high vs AMBR's 16.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 3.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.84 | $45.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.23 | $16.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.8% | +67.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.0 | 70.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 65K | 5.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMBR as "Buy" and GLXY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.0% upside for AMBR (target: $4) vs 20.3% for GLXY (target: $37).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $37.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.01 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMBR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). GLXY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMBR vs GLXY: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMBR or GLXY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is the stronger pick with 40.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -75. 4% for Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR). Analysts rate Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMBR or GLXY?
Over the past 5 years, Galaxy Digital (GLXY) delivered a total return of +36.
5%, compared to -72. 3% for Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLXY returned +36. 5% versus AMBR's -72. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMBR or GLXY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
99β versus Galaxy Digital's 3. 71β — meaning GLXY is approximately 87% more volatile than AMBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 176% for Galaxy Digital — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMBR or GLXY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is pulling ahead at 40.
2% versus -75. 4% for Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amber International Holding Ltd grew EPS 25. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 1% for Galaxy Digital. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMBR or GLXY?
Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is the more profitable company, earning -0.
4% net margin versus -88. 4% for Amber International Holding Ltd — meaning it keeps -0. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLXY leads at 0. 9% versus -52. 9% for AMBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMBR leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMBR or GLXY more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBR: 62.
0% to $3. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMBR or GLXY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AMBR or GLXY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Galaxy Digital (GLXY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding.
Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLXY: +36. 5%, AMBR: -72. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMBR and GLXY?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMBR (Real Estate) and GLXY (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GLXY is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.