Packaging & Containers
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMCR vs SLGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
AMCR vs SLGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaging & Containers | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $18.58B | $4.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $22.19B | $6.58B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $678M | $283M |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 17.4% |
| Operating Margin | 6.4% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.2x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $15.01B | $4.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $827M | $1.08B |
AMCR vs SLGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amcor plc (AMCR) | 100 | 393.8 | +293.8% |
| Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) | 100 | 121.1 | +21.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMCR vs SLGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMCR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 419.6% 10Y total return vs SLGN's 82.0%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 10.7x)
- 6.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0%
SLGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 10.7%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, current ratio 1.22x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.7% revenue growth vs AMCR's 10.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.3% margin vs AMCR's 3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs AMCR's 0.80 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs SLGN's 2.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +366.1% vs SLGN's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.0% ROA vs AMCR's 1.8%, ROIC 8.7% vs 4.1% |
AMCR vs SLGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMCR vs SLGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMCR and SLGN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMCR is the larger business by revenue, generating $22.2B annually — 3.4x SLGN's $6.6B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 4.3% (SLGN) to 3.1% (AMCR). On growth, AMCR holds the edge at +77.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $22.2B | $6.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.6B | $966M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $678M | $283M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $307M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +17.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.1% | +4.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +77.4% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.8% | -6.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SLGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.0x trailing earnings, SLGN trades at a 40% valuation discount to AMCR's 25.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SLGN's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMCR's 18.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18.6B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32.8B | $7.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.13x | 15.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.20x | 10.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.93x | 8.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.24x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.94x | 10.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLGN leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLGN delivers a 12.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $4 for AMCR. AMCR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLGN scores 8/9 vs AMCR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +12.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.1% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.8% | +9.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 2.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.2B | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $827M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15.0B | $4.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.85x | 3.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMCR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMCR five years ago would be worth $42,102 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,218 for SLGN. Over the past 12 months, AMCR leads with a +366.1% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMCR at 65.9% vs SLGN's -3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +385.9% | -1.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +366.1% | -23.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +356.8% | -10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.0% | +2.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +419.6% | +82.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +65.9% | -3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMCR and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMCR's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMCR currently trades 78.9% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 71.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.66x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $50.94 | $57.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.67 | $36.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.9% | +71.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.0 | 44.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 767K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMCR and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMCR as "Buy" and SLGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.7% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 24.3% for AMCR (target: $50). For income investors, AMCR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.60% vs SLGN's 1.98%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.00 | $50.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.6% | +2.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 21 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.65 | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.7% | +1.6% |
SLGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
AMCR vs SLGN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMCR or SLGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the stronger pick with 10. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 0% for Amcor plc (AMCR). Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN) offers the better valuation at 15. 0x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amcor plc (AMCR) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMCR or SLGN?
On trailing P/E, Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the cheapest at 15. 0x versus Amcor plc at 25. 1x. On forward P/E, Amcor plc is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMCR or SLGN?
Over the past 5 years, Amcor plc (AMCR) delivered a total return of +321.
0%, compared to +2. 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMCR returned +419. 6% versus SLGN's +82. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMCR or SLGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus Amcor plc's 0. 80β — meaning AMCR is approximately 21% more volatile than SLGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amcor plc (AMCR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 128% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMCR or SLGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is pulling ahead at 10. 7% versus 10. 0% for Amcor plc (AMCR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silgan Holdings Inc. grew EPS 4. 7% year-over-year, compared to -36. 8% for Amcor plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMCR leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMCR or SLGN?
Silgan Holdings Inc.
(SLGN) is the more profitable company, earning 4. 4% net margin versus 3. 4% for Amcor plc — meaning it keeps 4. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLGN leads at 10. 2% versus 6. 7% for AMCR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMCR leads at 18. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMCR or SLGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amcor plc (AMCR) trades at 10.
2x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Silgan Holdings Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 24. 7% to $50. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMCR or SLGN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Amcor plc (AMCR) offers the highest yield at 6. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN).
09Is AMCR or SLGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amcor plc (AMCR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 6. 6% yield, +419. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMCR: +419. 6%, SLGN: +82. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMCR and SLGN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMCR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.