Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMCX vs WBD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
AMCX vs WBD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $97M | $68.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.32B | $37.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $727M |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 2.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 93.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $32.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $4.57B |
AMCX vs WBD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 30.0 | -70.0% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 125.1 | +25.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMCX vs WBD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMCX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.86
- Rev growth -4.5%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -9.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.86
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -3.8% 10Y total return vs AMCX's -87.6%
- 1.9% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
- +222.7% vs AMCX's +32.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -4.5% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 93.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.9% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.86 vs WBD's 0.90 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +222.7% vs AMCX's +32.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 1.5% vs 12.1% |
AMCX vs WBD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMCX vs WBD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WBD is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.3B annually — 16.1x AMCX's $2.3B. WBD is the more profitable business, keeping 1.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $37.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $686M | $13.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | $727M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +2.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +1.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | -5.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.4% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $68.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $97M | $96.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 93.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 4.99x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.08x | 13.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 1.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.32x | 22.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WBD leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WBD delivers a 2.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WBD scores 6/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +2.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +1.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +1.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.88x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $28.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $4.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $32.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 1.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WBD five years ago would be worth $7,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,859 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +222.7% total return vs AMCX's +32.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.4% vs AMCX's -17.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -8.4% | -4.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.8% | +222.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.6% | +102.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.4% | -25.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.6% | -3.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.9% | +26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMCX and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMCX is the less volatile stock with a 0.86 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs AMCX's 83.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.18 | $30.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.41 | $8.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 391K | 22.4M |
Analyst Outlook
WBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMCX as "Hold" and WBD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.1% upside for WBD (target: $30) vs -5.5% for AMCX (target: $8).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $29.94 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
WBD leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMCX vs WBD: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMCX or WBD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is the stronger pick with -4. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD) offers the better valuation at 93. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) a "Hold" — based on 40 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMCX or WBD?
Over the past 5 years, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) delivered a total return of -25. 0%, compared to -81. 4% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WBD returned -3. 8% versus AMCX's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMCX or WBD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 86β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 5% more volatile than AMCX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — AMCX or WBD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is pulling ahead at -4. 5% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 100. 0% for AMC Networks Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WBD leads at 3. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMCX or WBD?
AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMCX leads at 5. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMCX leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AMCX or WBD more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WBD: 10.
1% to $29. 94.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMCX or WBD?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AMCX or WBD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Warner Bros.
Discovery, Inc. (WBD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WBD: -3. 8%, AMCX: -87. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMCX and WBD?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.