AME
AMETEK, Inc.
Industrial - Machinery
Market Cap$55.29B
5Y Perf.+163.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AME vs FTV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
FTV
Fortive Corporation
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$18.59B
5Y Perf.+57.1%
AME vs FTV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AME | FTV |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Machinery | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $55.29B | $18.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.60B | $4.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.53B | $544M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.2% | 17.7% |
| Forward P/E | 29.9x | 20.4x |
| Total Debt | $2.28B | $3.21B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $458M | $376M |
AME vs FTV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AME
FTV
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMETEK, Inc. (AME) | 100 | 263.2 | +163.2% |
| Fortive Corporation (FTV) | 100 | 157.1 | +57.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AME vs FTV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AME leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortive Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AME
AMETEK, Inc.
The Income Pick
AME carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.93, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 6.6%, EPS growth 7.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.4%
- 433.2% 10Y total return vs FTV's 103.5%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
FTV
Fortive Corporation
The Value Play
FTV is the clearest fit if your priority is value and stability.
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 29.9x)
- Beta 0.83 vs AME's 0.93
Best for: value and stability
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AME | 6.6% revenue growth vs FTV's -17.5% |
| Value | FTV | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 29.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | AME | 20.1% margin vs FTV's 11.5% |
| Stability / Safety | FTV | Beta 0.83 vs AME's 0.93 |
| Dividends | AME | 0.5% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs FTV's 0.5% |
| Momentum (1Y) | AME | +44.6% vs FTV's +19.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AME | 9.6% ROA vs FTV's 4.1%, ROIC 12.1% vs 6.0% |
AME vs FTV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
AME vs FTV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMELAGGINGFTV
FTVFortive Corporation
1leads
AMEAMETEK, Inc.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FTVMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AME5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FTV6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AME9/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AME6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AME2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AME leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AME is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.6B annually — 1.6x FTV's $4.7B. AME is the more profitable business, keeping 20.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FTV's 11.5%. On growth, AME holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.6B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $544M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.7B | $971M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.1% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.4% | +20.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | -27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.5% | -12.0% |
AME leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FTV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.7x trailing earnings, FTV trades at a 8% valuation discount to AME's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FTV's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AME's 30.4x.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55.3B | $18.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $57.1B | $21.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.72x | 34.71x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 29.93x | 20.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.39x | 17.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.47x | 3.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.25x | 2.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 33.08x | 19.01x |
FTV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AME leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AME delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for FTV. AME carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTV's 0.50x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AME scores 7/9 vs FTV's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.4% | +7.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.6% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.0% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.21x | 0.50x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.8B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $458M | $376M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.3B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 23.34x | 6.67x |
AME leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AME five years ago would be worth $18,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,269 for FTV. Over the past 12 months, AME leads with a +44.6% total return vs FTV's +19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AME at 19.1% vs FTV's 7.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.6% | +9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.6% | +19.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.8% | +25.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.5% | +12.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +433.2% | +103.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +7.8% |
AME leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AME and FTV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTV is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AME's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AME currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs FTV's 96.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $243.18 | $62.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $167.75 | $46.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.3% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 57.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 3.0M |
Evenly matched — AME and FTV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AME as "Buy" and FTV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1.9% upside for AME (target: $246) vs 0.4% for FTV (target: $61). For income investors, AME offers the higher dividend yield at 0.51% vs FTV's 0.48%.
| Metric | AMEAMETEK, Inc. | FTVFortive Corporati… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $245.91 | $60.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.23 | $0.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.8% | +8.7% |
AME leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AME leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FTV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAMETEK, Inc. (AME)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AME vs FTV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AME or FTV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AMETEK, Inc.
(AME) is the stronger pick with 6. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 5% for Fortive Corporation (FTV). Fortive Corporation (FTV) offers the better valuation at 34. 7x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMETEK, Inc. (AME) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AME or FTV?
On trailing P/E, Fortive Corporation (FTV) is the cheapest at 34.
7x versus AMETEK, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Fortive Corporation is actually cheaper at 20. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AME or FTV?
Over the past 5 years, AMETEK, Inc.
(AME) delivered a total return of +81. 5%, compared to +12. 7% for Fortive Corporation (FTV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AME returned +433. 2% versus FTV's +103. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AME or FTV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortive Corporation (FTV) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus AMETEK, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AME is approximately 13% more volatile than FTV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMETEK, Inc. (AME) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 50% for Fortive Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AME or FTV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AMETEK, Inc.
(AME) is pulling ahead at 6. 6% versus -17. 5% for Fortive Corporation (FTV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AMETEK, Inc. grew EPS 7. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 3% for Fortive Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AME leads at 6. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AME or FTV?
AMETEK, Inc.
(AME) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 0% net margin versus 11. 3% for Fortive Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AME leads at 26. 2% versus 17. 7% for FTV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTV leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AME or FTV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Fortive Corporation (FTV) trades at 20.
4x forward P/E versus 29. 9x for AMETEK, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AME: 1. 9% to $245. 91.
08Which pays a better dividend — AME or FTV?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AMETEK, Inc. (AME) offers the highest yield at 0. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Fortive Corporation (FTV).
09Is AME or FTV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMETEK, Inc.
(AME) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 93), 0. 5% yield, +433. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AME: +433. 2%, FTV: +103. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AME and FTV?
These companies operate in different sectors (AME (Industrials) and FTV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
AME pays a dividend while FTV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AME: 11.3% · FTV: -27.5%)Net Margin>
%
(AME: 20.1% · FTV: 11.5%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AME: 37.7x · FTV: 34.7x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.